893 lines
40 KiB
Markdown
893 lines
40 KiB
Markdown
|
High Availability and Failover
|
||
|
|
==============================
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
We define high availability as the *ability for the system to continue
|
||
|
|
functioning after failure of one or more of the servers*.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A part of high availability is *failover* which we define as the
|
||
|
|
*ability for client connections to migrate from one server to another in
|
||
|
|
event of server failure so client applications can continue to operate*.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Live - Backup Groups
|
||
|
|
====================
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
ActiveMQ allows servers to be linked together as *live - backup* groups
|
||
|
|
where each live server can have 1 or more backup servers. A backup
|
||
|
|
server is owned by only one live server. Backup servers are not
|
||
|
|
operational until failover occurs, however 1 chosen backup, which will
|
||
|
|
be in passive mode, announces its status and waits to take over the live
|
||
|
|
servers work
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Before failover, only the live server is serving the ActiveMQ clients
|
||
|
|
while the backup servers remain passive or awaiting to become a backup
|
||
|
|
server. When a live server crashes or is brought down in the correct
|
||
|
|
mode, the backup server currently in passive mode will become live and
|
||
|
|
another backup server will become passive. If a live server restarts
|
||
|
|
after a failover then it will have priority and be the next server to
|
||
|
|
become live when the current live server goes down, if the current live
|
||
|
|
server is configured to allow automatic failback then it will detect the
|
||
|
|
live server coming back up and automatically stop.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
HA Policies
|
||
|
|
-----------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
ActiveMQ supports two different strategies for backing up a server
|
||
|
|
*shared store* and *replication*. Which is configured via the
|
||
|
|
`ha-policy` configuration element.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
<replication/>
|
||
|
|
</ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
or
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
<shared-store/>
|
||
|
|
</ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
As well as these 2 strategies there is also a 3rd called `live-only`.
|
||
|
|
This of course means there will be no Backup Strategy and is the default
|
||
|
|
if none is provided, however this is used to configure `scale-down`
|
||
|
|
which we will cover in a later chapter.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> **Note**
|
||
|
|
>
|
||
|
|
> The `ha-policy` configurations replaces any current HA configuration
|
||
|
|
> in the root of the `activemq-configuration.xml` configuration. All old
|
||
|
|
> configuration is now deprecated altho best efforts will be made to
|
||
|
|
> honour it if configured this way.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> **Note**
|
||
|
|
>
|
||
|
|
> Only persistent message data will survive failover. Any non persistent
|
||
|
|
> message data will not be available after failover.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The `ha-policy` type configures which strategy a cluster should use to
|
||
|
|
provide the backing up of a servers data. Within this configuration
|
||
|
|
element is configured how a server should behave within the cluster,
|
||
|
|
either as a master (live), slave (backup) or colocated (both live and
|
||
|
|
backup). This would look something like:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
<replication>
|
||
|
|
<master/>
|
||
|
|
</replication>
|
||
|
|
</ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
or
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
<shared-store/>
|
||
|
|
<slave/>
|
||
|
|
</shared-store/>
|
||
|
|
</ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
or
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
<replication>
|
||
|
|
<colocated/>
|
||
|
|
</replication>
|
||
|
|
</ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Data Replication
|
||
|
|
----------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Support for network-based data replication was added in version 2.3.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
When using replication, the live and the backup servers do not share the
|
||
|
|
same data directories, all data synchronization is done over the
|
||
|
|
network. Therefore all (persistent) data received by the live server
|
||
|
|
will be duplicated to the backup.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
c
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Notice that upon start-up the backup server will first need to
|
||
|
|
synchronize all existing data from the live server before becoming
|
||
|
|
capable of replacing the live server should it fail. So unlike when
|
||
|
|
using shared storage, a replicating backup will not be a fully
|
||
|
|
operational backup right after start-up, but only after it finishes
|
||
|
|
synchronizing the data with its live server. The time it will take for
|
||
|
|
this to happen will depend on the amount of data to be synchronized and
|
||
|
|
the connection speed.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> **Note**
|
||
|
|
>
|
||
|
|
> Synchronization occurs in parallel with current network traffic so
|
||
|
|
> this won't cause any blocking on current clients.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Replication will create a copy of the data at the backup. One issue to
|
||
|
|
be aware of is: in case of a successful fail-over, the backup's data
|
||
|
|
will be newer than the one at the live's storage. If you configure your
|
||
|
|
live server to perform a ? when restarted, it will synchronize its data
|
||
|
|
with the backup's. If both servers are shutdown, the administrator will
|
||
|
|
have to determine which one has the latest data.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The replicating live and backup pair must be part of a cluster. The
|
||
|
|
Cluster Connection also defines how backup servers will find the remote
|
||
|
|
live servers to pair with. Refer to ? for details on how this is done,
|
||
|
|
and how to configure a cluster connection. Notice that:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- Both live and backup servers must be part of the same cluster.
|
||
|
|
Notice that even a simple live/backup replicating pair will require
|
||
|
|
a cluster configuration.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- Their cluster user and password must match.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Within a cluster, there are two ways that a backup server will locate a
|
||
|
|
live server to replicate from, these are:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- `specifying a node group`. You can specify a group of live servers
|
||
|
|
that a backup server can connect to. This is done by configuring
|
||
|
|
`group-name` in either the `master` or the `slave` element of the
|
||
|
|
`activemq-configuration.xml`. A Backup server will only connect to a
|
||
|
|
live server that shares the same node group name
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- `connecting to any live`. This will be the behaviour if `group-name`
|
||
|
|
is not configured allowing a backup server to connect to any live
|
||
|
|
server
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> **Note**
|
||
|
|
>
|
||
|
|
> A `group-name` example: suppose you have 5 live servers and 6 backup
|
||
|
|
> servers:
|
||
|
|
>
|
||
|
|
> - `live1`, `live2`, `live3`: with `group-name=fish`
|
||
|
|
>
|
||
|
|
> - `live4`, `live5`: with `group-name=bird`
|
||
|
|
>
|
||
|
|
> - `backup1`, `backup2`, `backup3`, `backup4`: with `group-name=fish`
|
||
|
|
>
|
||
|
|
> - `backup5`, `backup6`: with `group-name=bird`
|
||
|
|
>
|
||
|
|
> After joining the cluster the backups with `group-name=fish` will
|
||
|
|
> search for live servers with `group-name=fish` to pair with. Since
|
||
|
|
> there is one backup too many, the `fish` will remain with one spare
|
||
|
|
> backup.
|
||
|
|
>
|
||
|
|
> The 2 backups with `group-name=bird` (`backup5` and `backup6`) will
|
||
|
|
> pair with live servers `live4` and `live5`.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The backup will search for any live server that it is configured to
|
||
|
|
connect to. It then tries to replicate with each live server in turn
|
||
|
|
until it finds a live server that has no current backup configured. If
|
||
|
|
no live server is available it will wait until the cluster topology
|
||
|
|
changes and repeats the process.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> **Note**
|
||
|
|
>
|
||
|
|
> This is an important distinction from a shared-store backup, if a
|
||
|
|
> backup starts and does not find a live server, the server will just
|
||
|
|
> activate and start to serve client requests. In the replication case,
|
||
|
|
> the backup just keeps waiting for a live server to pair with. Note
|
||
|
|
> that in replication the backup server does not know whether any data
|
||
|
|
> it might have is up to date, so it really cannot decide to activate
|
||
|
|
> automatically. To activate a replicating backup server using the data
|
||
|
|
> it has, the administrator must change its configuration to make it a
|
||
|
|
> live server by changing `slave` to `master`.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Much like in the shared-store case, when the live server stops or
|
||
|
|
crashes, its replicating backup will become active and take over its
|
||
|
|
duties. Specifically, the backup will become active when it loses
|
||
|
|
connection to its live server. This can be problematic because this can
|
||
|
|
also happen because of a temporary network problem. In order to address
|
||
|
|
this issue, the backup will try to determine whether it still can
|
||
|
|
connect to the other servers in the cluster. If it can connect to more
|
||
|
|
than half the servers, it will become active, if more than half the
|
||
|
|
servers also disappeared with the live, the backup will wait and try
|
||
|
|
reconnecting with the live. This avoids a split brain situation.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Configuration
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
To configure the live and backup servers to be a replicating pair,
|
||
|
|
configure the live server in ' `activemq-configuration.xml` to have:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
<replication>
|
||
|
|
<master/>
|
||
|
|
</replication>
|
||
|
|
</ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
.
|
||
|
|
<cluster-connections>
|
||
|
|
<cluster-connection name="my-cluster">
|
||
|
|
...
|
||
|
|
</cluster-connection>
|
||
|
|
</cluster-connections>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The backup server must be similarly configured but as a `slave`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
<replication>
|
||
|
|
<slave/>
|
||
|
|
</replication>
|
||
|
|
</ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### All Replication Configuration
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The following table lists all the `ha-policy` configuration elements for
|
||
|
|
HA strategy Replication for `master`:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
name Description
|
||
|
|
------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
`check-for-live-server` Whether to check the cluster for a (live) server using our own server ID when starting up. This option is only necessary for performing 'fail-back' on replicating servers.
|
||
|
|
`cluster-name` Name of the cluster configuration to use for replication. This setting is only necessary if you configure multiple cluster connections. If configured then the connector configuration of the cluster configuration with this name will be used when connecting to the cluster to discover if a live server is already running, see `check-for-live-server`. If unset then the default cluster connections configuration is used (the first one configured)
|
||
|
|
`group-name` If set, backup servers will only pair with live servers with matching group-name
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The following table lists all the `ha-policy` configuration elements for
|
||
|
|
HA strategy Replication for `slave`:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
name Description
|
||
|
|
-------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
`cluster-name` Name of the cluster configuration to use for replication. This setting is only necessary if you configure multiple cluster connections. If configured then the connector configuration of the cluster configuration with this name will be used when connecting to the cluster to discover if a live server is already running, see `check-for-live-server`. If unset then the default cluster connections configuration is used (the first one configured)
|
||
|
|
`group-name` If set, backup servers will only pair with live servers with matching group-name
|
||
|
|
`max-saved-replicated-journals-size` This specifies how many times a replicated backup server can restart after moving its files on start. Once there are this number of backup journal files the server will stop permanently after if fails back.
|
||
|
|
`allow-failback` Whether a server will automatically stop when a another places a request to take over its place. The use case is when the backup has failed over
|
||
|
|
`failback-delay` delay to wait before fail-back occurs on (failed over live's) restart
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Shared Store
|
||
|
|
------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
When using a shared store, both live and backup servers share the *same*
|
||
|
|
entire data directory using a shared file system. This means the paging
|
||
|
|
directory, journal directory, large messages and binding journal.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
When failover occurs and a backup server takes over, it will load the
|
||
|
|
persistent storage from the shared file system and clients can connect
|
||
|
|
to it.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This style of high availability differs from data replication in that it
|
||
|
|
requires a shared file system which is accessible by both the live and
|
||
|
|
backup nodes. Typically this will be some kind of high performance
|
||
|
|
Storage Area Network (SAN). We do not recommend you use Network Attached
|
||
|
|
Storage (NAS), e.g. NFS mounts to store any shared journal (NFS is
|
||
|
|
slow).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The advantage of shared-store high availability is that no replication
|
||
|
|
occurs between the live and backup nodes, this means it does not suffer
|
||
|
|
any performance penalties due to the overhead of replication during
|
||
|
|
normal operation.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The disadvantage of shared store replication is that it requires a
|
||
|
|
shared file system, and when the backup server activates it needs to
|
||
|
|
load the journal from the shared store which can take some time
|
||
|
|
depending on the amount of data in the store.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If you require the highest performance during normal operation, have
|
||
|
|
access to a fast SAN and live with a slightly slower failover (depending
|
||
|
|
on amount of data).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Configuration
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
To configure the live and backup servers to share their store, configure
|
||
|
|
id via the `ha-policy` configuration in `activemq-configuration.xml`:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
<shared-store>
|
||
|
|
<master/>
|
||
|
|
</shared-store>
|
||
|
|
</ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
.
|
||
|
|
<cluster-connections>
|
||
|
|
<cluster-connection name="my-cluster">
|
||
|
|
...
|
||
|
|
</cluster-connection>
|
||
|
|
</cluster-connections>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The backup server must also be configured as a backup.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
<shared-store>
|
||
|
|
<slave/>
|
||
|
|
</shared-store>
|
||
|
|
</ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In order for live - backup groups to operate properly with a shared
|
||
|
|
store, both servers must have configured the location of journal
|
||
|
|
directory to point to the *same shared location* (as explained in ?)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> **Note**
|
||
|
|
>
|
||
|
|
> todo write something about GFS
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Also each node, live and backups, will need to have a cluster connection
|
||
|
|
defined even if not part of a cluster. The Cluster Connection info
|
||
|
|
defines how backup servers announce there presence to its live server or
|
||
|
|
any other nodes in the cluster. Refer to ? for details on how this is
|
||
|
|
done.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Failing Back to live Server
|
||
|
|
---------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
After a live server has failed and a backup taken has taken over its
|
||
|
|
duties, you may want to restart the live server and have clients fail
|
||
|
|
back.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In case of "shared disk", simply restart the original live server and
|
||
|
|
kill the new live server by can do this by killing the process itself.
|
||
|
|
Alternatively you can set `allow-fail-back` to `true` on the slave
|
||
|
|
config which will force the backup that has become live to automatically
|
||
|
|
stop. This configuration would look like:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
<shared-store>
|
||
|
|
<slave>
|
||
|
|
<allow-failback>true</allow-failback>
|
||
|
|
<failback-delay>5000</failback-delay>
|
||
|
|
</slave>
|
||
|
|
</shared-store>
|
||
|
|
</ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The `failback-delay` configures how long the backup must wait after
|
||
|
|
automatically stopping before it restarts. This is to gives the live
|
||
|
|
server time to start and obtain its lock.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In replication HA mode you need to set an extra property
|
||
|
|
`check-for-live-server` to `true` in the `master` configuration. If set
|
||
|
|
to true, during start-up a live server will first search the cluster for
|
||
|
|
another server using its nodeID. If it finds one, it will contact this
|
||
|
|
server and try to "fail-back". Since this is a remote replication
|
||
|
|
scenario, the "starting live" will have to synchronize its data with the
|
||
|
|
server running with its ID, once they are in sync, it will request the
|
||
|
|
other server (which it assumes it is a back that has assumed its duties)
|
||
|
|
to shutdown for it to take over. This is necessary because otherwise the
|
||
|
|
live server has no means to know whether there was a fail-over or not,
|
||
|
|
and if there was if the server that took its duties is still running or
|
||
|
|
not. To configure this option at your `activemq-configuration.xml`
|
||
|
|
configuration file as follows:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
<replication>
|
||
|
|
<master>
|
||
|
|
<check-for-live-server>true</check-for-live-server>
|
||
|
|
<master>
|
||
|
|
</replication>
|
||
|
|
</ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> **Warning**
|
||
|
|
>
|
||
|
|
> Be aware that if you restart a live server while after failover has
|
||
|
|
> occurred then this value must be set to ``. If not the live server
|
||
|
|
> will restart and server the same messages that the backup has already
|
||
|
|
> handled causing duplicates.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
It is also possible, in the case of shared store, to cause failover to
|
||
|
|
occur on normal server shutdown, to enable this set the following
|
||
|
|
property to true in the `ha-policy` configuration on either the `master`
|
||
|
|
or `slave` like so:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
<shared-store>
|
||
|
|
<master>
|
||
|
|
<failover-on-shutdown>true</failover-on-shutdown>
|
||
|
|
</master>
|
||
|
|
</shared-store>
|
||
|
|
</ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
By default this is set to false, if by some chance you have set this to
|
||
|
|
false but still want to stop the server normally and cause failover then
|
||
|
|
you can do this by using the management API as explained at ?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
You can also force the running live server to shutdown when the old live
|
||
|
|
server comes back up allowing the original live server to take over
|
||
|
|
automatically by setting the following property in the
|
||
|
|
`activemq-configuration.xml` configuration file as follows:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
<shared-store>
|
||
|
|
<slave>
|
||
|
|
<allow-failback>true</allow-failback>
|
||
|
|
</slave>
|
||
|
|
</shared-store>
|
||
|
|
</ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### All Shared Store Configuration
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The following table lists all the `ha-policy` configuration elements for
|
||
|
|
HA strategy shared store for `master`:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
name Description
|
||
|
|
------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
`failback-delay` If a backup server is detected as being live, via the lock file, then the live server will wait announce itself as a backup and wait this amount of time (in ms) before starting as a live
|
||
|
|
`failover-on-server-shutdown` If set to true then when this server is stopped normally the backup will become live assuming failover. If false then the backup server will remain passive. Note that if false you want failover to occur the you can use the the management API as explained at ?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The following table lists all the `ha-policy` configuration elements for
|
||
|
|
HA strategy Shared Store for `slave`:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
name Description
|
||
|
|
------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
`failover-on-server-shutdown` In the case of a backup that has become live. then when set to true then when this server is stopped normally the backup will become liveassuming failover. If false then the backup server will remain passive. Note that if false you want failover to occur the you can use the the management API as explained at ?
|
||
|
|
`allow-failback` Whether a server will automatically stop when a another places a request to take over its place. The use case is when the backup has failed over.
|
||
|
|
`failback-delay` After failover and the slave has become live, this is set on the new live server. When starting If a backup server is detected as being live, via the lock file, then the live server will wait announce itself as a backup and wait this amount of time (in ms) before starting as a live, however this is unlikely since this backup has just stopped anyway. It is also used as the delay after failback before this backup will restart (if `allow-failback` is set to true.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Colocated Backup Servers
|
||
|
|
------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
It is also possible when running standalone to colocate backup servers
|
||
|
|
in the same JVM as another live server. Live Servers can be configured
|
||
|
|
to request another live server in the cluster to start a backup server
|
||
|
|
in the same JVM either using shared store or replication. The new backup
|
||
|
|
server will inherit its configuration from the live server creating it
|
||
|
|
apart from its name, which will be set to `colocated_backup_n` where n
|
||
|
|
is the number of backups the server has created, and any directories and
|
||
|
|
its Connectors and Acceptors which are discussed later on in this
|
||
|
|
chapter. A live server can also be configured to allow requests from
|
||
|
|
backups and also how many backups a live server can start. this way you
|
||
|
|
can evenly distribute backups around the cluster. This is configured via
|
||
|
|
the `ha-policy` element in the `activemq-configuration.xml` file like
|
||
|
|
so:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
<replication>
|
||
|
|
<colocated>
|
||
|
|
<request-backup>true</request-backup>
|
||
|
|
<max-backups>1</max-backups>
|
||
|
|
<backup-request-retries>-1</backup-request-retries>
|
||
|
|
<backup-request-retry-interval>5000</backup-request-retry-interval>
|
||
|
|
<master/>
|
||
|
|
<slave/>
|
||
|
|
</colocated>
|
||
|
|
<replication>
|
||
|
|
</ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
the above example is configured to use replication, in this case the
|
||
|
|
`master` and `slave` configurations must match those for normal
|
||
|
|
replication as in the previous chapter. `shared-store` is also supported
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Configuring Connectors and Acceptors
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If the HA Policy is colocated then connectors and acceptors will be
|
||
|
|
inherited from the live server creating it and offset depending on the
|
||
|
|
setting of `backup-port-offset` configuration element. If this is set to
|
||
|
|
say 100 (which is the default) and a connector is using port 5445 then
|
||
|
|
this will be set to 5545 for the first server created, 5645 for the
|
||
|
|
second and so on.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> **Note**
|
||
|
|
>
|
||
|
|
> for INVM connectors and Acceptors the id will have
|
||
|
|
> `colocated_backup_n` appended, where n is the backup server number.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Remote Connectors
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
It may be that some of the Connectors configured are for external
|
||
|
|
servers and hence should be excluded from the offset. for instance a
|
||
|
|
Connector used by the cluster connection to do quorum voting for a
|
||
|
|
replicated backup server, these can be omitted from being offset by
|
||
|
|
adding them to the `ha-policy` configuration like so:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
<replication>
|
||
|
|
<colocated>
|
||
|
|
<excludes>
|
||
|
|
<connector-ref>remote-connector</connector-ref>
|
||
|
|
</excludes>
|
||
|
|
.........
|
||
|
|
</ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Configuring Directories
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Directories for the Journal, Large messages and Paging will be set
|
||
|
|
according to what the HA strategy is. If shared store the the requesting
|
||
|
|
server will notify the target server of which directories to use. If
|
||
|
|
replication is configured then directories will be inherited from the
|
||
|
|
creating server but have the new backups name appended.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The following table lists all the `ha-policy` configuration elements:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
name Description
|
||
|
|
--------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
`request-backup` If true then the server will request a backup on another node
|
||
|
|
`backup-request-retries` How many times the live server will try to request a backup, -1 means for ever.
|
||
|
|
`backup-request-retry-interval` How long to wait for retries between attempts to request a backup server.
|
||
|
|
`max-backups` Whether or not this live server will accept backup requests from other live servers.
|
||
|
|
`backup-port-offset` The offset to use for the Connectors and Acceptors when creating a new backup server.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Scaling Down
|
||
|
|
============
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
An alternative to using Live/Backup groups is to configure scaledown.
|
||
|
|
when configured for scale down a server can copy all its messages and
|
||
|
|
transaction state to another live server. The advantage of this is that
|
||
|
|
you dont need full backups to provide some form of HA, however there are
|
||
|
|
disadvantages with this approach the first being that it only deals with
|
||
|
|
a server being stopped and not a server crash. The caveat here is if you
|
||
|
|
configure a backup to scale down.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Another disadvantage is that it is possible to lose message ordering.
|
||
|
|
This happens in the following scenario, say you have 2 live servers and
|
||
|
|
messages are distributed evenly between the servers from a single
|
||
|
|
producer, if one of the servers scales down then the messages sent back
|
||
|
|
to the other server will be in the queue after the ones already there,
|
||
|
|
so server 1 could have messages 1,3,5,7,9 and server 2 would have
|
||
|
|
2,4,6,8,10, if server 2 scales down the order in server 1 would be
|
||
|
|
1,3,5,7,9,2,4,6,8,10.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The configuration for a live server to scale down would be something
|
||
|
|
like:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
<live-only>
|
||
|
|
<scale-down>
|
||
|
|
<connectors>
|
||
|
|
<connector-ref>server1-connector</connector-ref>
|
||
|
|
</connectors>
|
||
|
|
</scale-down>
|
||
|
|
</live-only>
|
||
|
|
</ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In this instance the server is configured to use a specific connector to
|
||
|
|
scale down, if a connector is not specified then the first INVM
|
||
|
|
connector is chosen, this is to make scale down fromm a backup server
|
||
|
|
easy to configure. It is also possible to use discovery to scale down,
|
||
|
|
this would look like:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
<live-only>
|
||
|
|
<scale-down>
|
||
|
|
<discovery-group>my-discovery-group</discovery-group>
|
||
|
|
</scale-down>
|
||
|
|
</live-only>
|
||
|
|
</ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Scale Down with groups
|
||
|
|
----------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
It is also possible to configure servers to only scale down to servers
|
||
|
|
that belong in the same group. This is done by configuring the group
|
||
|
|
like so:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
<live-only>
|
||
|
|
<scale-down>
|
||
|
|
...
|
||
|
|
<group-name>my-group</group-name>
|
||
|
|
</scale-down>
|
||
|
|
</live-only>
|
||
|
|
</ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In this scenario only servers that belong to the group `my-group` will
|
||
|
|
be scaled down to
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Scale Down and Backups
|
||
|
|
----------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
It is also possible to mix scale down with HA via backup servers. If a
|
||
|
|
slave is configured to scale down then after failover has occurred,
|
||
|
|
instead of starting fully the backup server will immediately scale down
|
||
|
|
to another live server. The most appropriate configuration for this is
|
||
|
|
using the `colocated` approach. it means as you bring up live server
|
||
|
|
they will automatically be backed up by server and as live servers are
|
||
|
|
shutdown, there messages are made available on another live server. A
|
||
|
|
typical configuration would look like:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
<replication>
|
||
|
|
<colocated>
|
||
|
|
<backup-request-retries>44</backup-request-retries>
|
||
|
|
<backup-request-retry-interval>33</backup-request-retry-interval>
|
||
|
|
<max-backups>3</max-backups>
|
||
|
|
<request-backup>false</request-backup>
|
||
|
|
<backup-port-offset>33</backup-port-offset>
|
||
|
|
<master>
|
||
|
|
<group-name>purple</group-name>
|
||
|
|
<check-for-live-server>true</check-for-live-server>
|
||
|
|
<cluster-name>abcdefg</cluster-name>
|
||
|
|
</master>
|
||
|
|
<slave>
|
||
|
|
<group-name>tiddles</group-name>
|
||
|
|
<max-saved-replicated-journals-size>22</max-saved-replicated-journals-size>
|
||
|
|
<cluster-name>33rrrrr</cluster-name>
|
||
|
|
<restart-backup>false</restart-backup>
|
||
|
|
<scale-down>
|
||
|
|
<!--a grouping of servers that can be scaled down to-->
|
||
|
|
<group-name>boo!</group-name>
|
||
|
|
<!--either a discovery group-->
|
||
|
|
<discovery-group>wahey</discovery-group>
|
||
|
|
</scale-down>
|
||
|
|
</slave>
|
||
|
|
</colocated>
|
||
|
|
</replication>
|
||
|
|
</ha-policy>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Scale Down and Clients
|
||
|
|
----------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
When a server is stopping and preparing to scale down it will send a
|
||
|
|
message to all its clients informing them which server it is scaling
|
||
|
|
down to before disconnecting them. At this point the client will
|
||
|
|
reconnect however this will only succeed once the server has completed
|
||
|
|
scaledown. This is to ensure that any state such as queues or
|
||
|
|
transactions are there for the client when it reconnects. The normal
|
||
|
|
reconnect settings apply when the client is reconnecting so these should
|
||
|
|
be high enough to deal with the time needed to scale down.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Failover Modes
|
||
|
|
==============
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
ActiveMQ defines two types of client failover:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- Automatic client failover
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- Application-level client failover
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
ActiveMQ also provides 100% transparent automatic reattachment of
|
||
|
|
connections to the same server (e.g. in case of transient network
|
||
|
|
problems). This is similar to failover, except it is reconnecting to the
|
||
|
|
same server and is discussed in ?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
During failover, if the client has consumers on any non persistent or
|
||
|
|
temporary queues, those queues will be automatically recreated during
|
||
|
|
failover on the backup node, since the backup node will not have any
|
||
|
|
knowledge of non persistent queues.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Automatic Client Failover
|
||
|
|
-------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
ActiveMQ clients can be configured to receive knowledge of all live and
|
||
|
|
backup servers, so that in event of connection failure at the client -
|
||
|
|
live server connection, the client will detect this and reconnect to the
|
||
|
|
backup server. The backup server will then automatically recreate any
|
||
|
|
sessions and consumers that existed on each connection before failover,
|
||
|
|
thus saving the user from having to hand-code manual reconnection logic.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
ActiveMQ clients detect connection failure when it has not received
|
||
|
|
packets from the server within the time given by
|
||
|
|
`client-failure-check-period` as explained in section ?. If the client
|
||
|
|
does not receive data in good time, it will assume the connection has
|
||
|
|
failed and attempt failover. Also if the socket is closed by the OS,
|
||
|
|
usually if the server process is killed rather than the machine itself
|
||
|
|
crashing, then the client will failover straight away.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
ActiveMQ clients can be configured to discover the list of live-backup
|
||
|
|
server groups in a number of different ways. They can be configured
|
||
|
|
explicitly or probably the most common way of doing this is to use
|
||
|
|
*server discovery* for the client to automatically discover the list.
|
||
|
|
For full details on how to configure server discovery, please see ?.
|
||
|
|
Alternatively, the clients can explicitly connect to a specific server
|
||
|
|
and download the current servers and backups see ?.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
To enable automatic client failover, the client must be configured to
|
||
|
|
allow non-zero reconnection attempts (as explained in ?).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
By default failover will only occur after at least one connection has
|
||
|
|
been made to the live server. In other words, by default, failover will
|
||
|
|
not occur if the client fails to make an initial connection to the live
|
||
|
|
server - in this case it will simply retry connecting to the live server
|
||
|
|
according to the reconnect-attempts property and fail after this number
|
||
|
|
of attempts.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Failing over on the Initial Connection
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Since the client does not learn about the full topology until after the
|
||
|
|
first connection is made there is a window where it does not know about
|
||
|
|
the backup. If a failure happens at this point the client can only try
|
||
|
|
reconnecting to the original live server. To configure how many attempts
|
||
|
|
the client will make you can set the property `initialConnectAttempts`
|
||
|
|
on the `ClientSessionFactoryImpl` or `ActiveMQConnectionFactory` or
|
||
|
|
`initial-connect-attempts` in xml. The default for this is `0`, that is
|
||
|
|
try only once. Once the number of attempts has been made an exception
|
||
|
|
will be thrown.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
For examples of automatic failover with transacted and non-transacted
|
||
|
|
JMS sessions, please see ? and ?.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### A Note on Server Replication
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
ActiveMQ does not replicate full server state between live and backup
|
||
|
|
servers. When the new session is automatically recreated on the backup
|
||
|
|
it won't have any knowledge of messages already sent or acknowledged in
|
||
|
|
that session. Any in-flight sends or acknowledgements at the time of
|
||
|
|
failover might also be lost.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
By replicating full server state, theoretically we could provide a 100%
|
||
|
|
transparent seamless failover, which would avoid any lost messages or
|
||
|
|
acknowledgements, however this comes at a great cost: replicating the
|
||
|
|
full server state (including the queues, session, etc.). This would
|
||
|
|
require replication of the entire server state machine; every operation
|
||
|
|
on the live server would have to replicated on the replica server(s) in
|
||
|
|
the exact same global order to ensure a consistent replica state. This
|
||
|
|
is extremely hard to do in a performant and scalable way, especially
|
||
|
|
when one considers that multiple threads are changing the live server
|
||
|
|
state concurrently.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
It is possible to provide full state machine replication using
|
||
|
|
techniques such as *virtual synchrony*, but this does not scale well and
|
||
|
|
effectively serializes all operations to a single thread, dramatically
|
||
|
|
reducing concurrency.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Other techniques for multi-threaded active replication exist such as
|
||
|
|
replicating lock states or replicating thread scheduling but this is
|
||
|
|
very hard to achieve at a Java level.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Consequently it has decided it was not worth massively reducing
|
||
|
|
performance and concurrency for the sake of 100% transparent failover.
|
||
|
|
Even without 100% transparent failover, it is simple to guarantee *once
|
||
|
|
and only once* delivery, even in the case of failure, by using a
|
||
|
|
combination of duplicate detection and retrying of transactions. However
|
||
|
|
this is not 100% transparent to the client code.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Handling Blocking Calls During Failover
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If the client code is in a blocking call to the server, waiting for a
|
||
|
|
response to continue its execution, when failover occurs, the new
|
||
|
|
session will not have any knowledge of the call that was in progress.
|
||
|
|
This call might otherwise hang for ever, waiting for a response that
|
||
|
|
will never come.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
To prevent this, ActiveMQ will unblock any blocking calls that were in
|
||
|
|
progress at the time of failover by making them throw a
|
||
|
|
`javax.jms.JMSException` (if using JMS), or a `ActiveMQException` with
|
||
|
|
error code `ActiveMQException.UNBLOCKED`. It is up to the client code to
|
||
|
|
catch this exception and retry any operations if desired.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If the method being unblocked is a call to commit(), or prepare(), then
|
||
|
|
the transaction will be automatically rolled back and ActiveMQ will
|
||
|
|
throw a `javax.jms.TransactionRolledBackException` (if using JMS), or a
|
||
|
|
`ActiveMQException` with error code
|
||
|
|
`ActiveMQException.TRANSACTION_ROLLED_BACK` if using the core API.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Handling Failover With Transactions
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If the session is transactional and messages have already been sent or
|
||
|
|
acknowledged in the current transaction, then the server cannot be sure
|
||
|
|
that messages sent or acknowledgements have not been lost during the
|
||
|
|
failover.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Consequently the transaction will be marked as rollback-only, and any
|
||
|
|
subsequent attempt to commit it will throw a
|
||
|
|
`javax.jms.TransactionRolledBackException` (if using JMS), or a
|
||
|
|
`ActiveMQException` with error code
|
||
|
|
`ActiveMQException.TRANSACTION_ROLLED_BACK` if using the core API.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> **Warning**
|
||
|
|
>
|
||
|
|
> The caveat to this rule is when XA is used either via JMS or through
|
||
|
|
> the core API. If 2 phase commit is used and prepare has already been
|
||
|
|
> called then rolling back could cause a `HeuristicMixedException`.
|
||
|
|
> Because of this the commit will throw a `XAException.XA_RETRY`
|
||
|
|
> exception. This informs the Transaction Manager that it should retry
|
||
|
|
> the commit at some later point in time, a side effect of this is that
|
||
|
|
> any non persistent messages will be lost. To avoid this use persistent
|
||
|
|
> messages when using XA. With acknowledgements this is not an issue
|
||
|
|
> since they are flushed to the server before prepare gets called.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
It is up to the user to catch the exception, and perform any client side
|
||
|
|
local rollback code as necessary. There is no need to manually rollback
|
||
|
|
the session - it is already rolled back. The user can then just retry
|
||
|
|
the transactional operations again on the same session.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
ActiveMQ ships with a fully functioning example demonstrating how to do
|
||
|
|
this, please see ?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If failover occurs when a commit call is being executed, the server, as
|
||
|
|
previously described, will unblock the call to prevent a hang, since no
|
||
|
|
response will come back. In this case it is not easy for the client to
|
||
|
|
determine whether the transaction commit was actually processed on the
|
||
|
|
live server before failure occurred.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> **Note**
|
||
|
|
>
|
||
|
|
> If XA is being used either via JMS or through the core API then an
|
||
|
|
> `XAException.XA_RETRY` is thrown. This is to inform Transaction
|
||
|
|
> Managers that a retry should occur at some point. At some later point
|
||
|
|
> in time the Transaction Manager will retry the commit. If the original
|
||
|
|
> commit has not occurred then it will still exist and be committed, if
|
||
|
|
> it does not exist then it is assumed to have been committed although
|
||
|
|
> the transaction manager may log a warning.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
To remedy this, the client can simply enable duplicate detection (?) in
|
||
|
|
the transaction, and retry the transaction operations again after the
|
||
|
|
call is unblocked. If the transaction had indeed been committed on the
|
||
|
|
live server successfully before failover, then when the transaction is
|
||
|
|
retried, duplicate detection will ensure that any durable messages
|
||
|
|
resent in the transaction will be ignored on the server to prevent them
|
||
|
|
getting sent more than once.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> **Note**
|
||
|
|
>
|
||
|
|
> By catching the rollback exceptions and retrying, catching unblocked
|
||
|
|
> calls and enabling duplicate detection, once and only once delivery
|
||
|
|
> guarantees for messages can be provided in the case of failure,
|
||
|
|
> guaranteeing 100% no loss or duplication of messages.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Handling Failover With Non Transactional Sessions
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If the session is non transactional, messages or acknowledgements can be
|
||
|
|
lost in the event of failover.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If you wish to provide *once and only once* delivery guarantees for non
|
||
|
|
transacted sessions too, enabled duplicate detection, and catch unblock
|
||
|
|
exceptions as described in ?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Getting Notified of Connection Failure
|
||
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
JMS provides a standard mechanism for getting notified asynchronously of
|
||
|
|
connection failure: `java.jms.ExceptionListener`. Please consult the JMS
|
||
|
|
javadoc or any good JMS tutorial for more information on how to use
|
||
|
|
this.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The ActiveMQ core API also provides a similar feature in the form of the
|
||
|
|
class `org.apache.activemq.core.client.SessionFailureListener`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Any ExceptionListener or SessionFailureListener instance will always be
|
||
|
|
called by ActiveMQ on event of connection failure, **irrespective** of
|
||
|
|
whether the connection was successfully failed over, reconnected or
|
||
|
|
reattached, however you can find out if reconnect or reattach has
|
||
|
|
happened by either the `failedOver` flag passed in on the
|
||
|
|
`connectionFailed` on `SessionfailureListener` or by inspecting the
|
||
|
|
error code on the `javax.jms.JMSException` which will be one of the
|
||
|
|
following:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
error code Description
|
||
|
|
------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
FAILOVER Failover has occurred and we have successfully reattached or reconnected.
|
||
|
|
DISCONNECT No failover has occurred and we are disconnected.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
: JMSException error codes
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Application-Level Failover
|
||
|
|
--------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In some cases you may not want automatic client failover, and prefer to
|
||
|
|
handle any connection failure yourself, and code your own manually
|
||
|
|
reconnection logic in your own failure handler. We define this as
|
||
|
|
*application-level* failover, since the failover is handled at the user
|
||
|
|
application level.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
To implement application-level failover, if you're using JMS then you
|
||
|
|
need to set an `ExceptionListener` class on the JMS connection. The
|
||
|
|
`ExceptionListener` will be called by ActiveMQ in the event that
|
||
|
|
connection failure is detected. In your `ExceptionListener`, you would
|
||
|
|
close your old JMS connections, potentially look up new connection
|
||
|
|
factory instances from JNDI and creating new connections. In this case
|
||
|
|
you may well be using
|
||
|
|
[HA-JNDI](http://www.jboss.org/community/wiki/JBossHAJNDIImpl) to ensure
|
||
|
|
that the new connection factory is looked up from a different server.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
For a working example of application-level failover, please see ?.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If you are using the core API, then the procedure is very similar: you
|
||
|
|
would set a `FailureListener` on the core `ClientSession` instances.
|