activemq-artemis/docs/user-manual/ring-queues.adoc

162 lines
6.6 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

ARTEMIS-4383 migrate user docs to AsciiDoc Markdown, which is currently used for user-facing documentation, is good for a lot of things. However, it's not great for the kind of complex documentation we have and our need to produce both multi-page HTML and single-page PDF output via Maven. Markdown lacks features which would make the documentation easier to read, easier to navigate, and just look better overall. The current tool-chain uses honkit and a tool called Calibre. Honkit is written in TypeScript and is installed via NPM. Calibre is a native tool so it must be installed via an OS-specific package manager. All this complexity makes building, releasing, uploading, etc. a pain. AsciiDoc is relatively simple like Markdown, but it has more features for presentation and navigation not to mention Java-based Maven tooling to generate both HTML and PDF. Migrating will improve both the appearance of the documentation as well as the processes to generate and upload it. This commit contains the following changes: - Convert all the Markdown for the User Manual, Migration Guide, and Hacking guide to AsciiDoc via kramdown [1]. - Update the `artemis-website` build to use AsciiDoctor Maven tooling. - Update `RELEASING.md` with simplified instructions. - Update Hacking Guide with simplified instructions. - Use AsciiDoc link syntax in Artemis Maven doc plugin. - Drop EPUB & MOBI docs for User Manual as well as PDF for the Hacking Guide. All docs will be HTML only except for the User Manual which will have PDF. - Move all docs up out of their respective "en" directory. This was a hold-over from when we had docs in different languages. - Migration & Hacking Guides are now single-page HTML since they are relatively short. - Refactor README.md to simplify and remove redundant content. Benefits of the change: - Much simplified tooling. No more NPM packages or native tools. - Auto-generated table of contents for every chapter. - Auto-generated anchor links for every sub-section. - Overall more appealing presentation. - All docs will use the ActiveMQ favicon. - No more manual line-wrapping! AsciiDoc recommends one sentence per line and paragraphs are separated by a blank line. - AsciiDoctor plugins for IDEA are quite good. - Resulting HTML is less than *half* of the previous size. All previous links/bookmarks should continue to work. [1] https://github.com/asciidoctor/kramdown-asciidoc
2023-07-27 23:45:17 -04:00
= Ring Queue
:idprefix:
:idseparator: -
Queues operate with first-in, first-out (FIFO) semantics which means that messages, in general, are added to the "tail" of the queue and removed from the "head." A "ring" queue is a special type of queue with a _fixed_ size.
The fixed size is maintained by removing the message at the head of the queue when the number of messages on the queue reaches the configured size.
For example, consider a queue configured with a ring size of 3 and a producer which sends the messages `A`, `B`, `C`, & `D` in that order.
Once `C` is sent the number of messages in the queue will be 3 which is the same as the configured ring size.
We can visualize the queue growth like this...
After `A` is sent:
----
|---|
head/tail -> | A |
|---|
----
After `B` is sent:
----
|---|
head -> | A |
|---|
tail -> | B |
|---|
----
After `C` is sent:
----
|---|
head -> | A |
|---|
| B |
|---|
tail -> | C |
|---|
----
When `D` is sent it will be added to the tail of the queue and the message at the head of the queue (i.e. `A`) will be removed so the queue will look like this:
----
|---|
head -> | B |
|---|
| C |
|---|
tail -> | D |
|---|
----
This example covers the most basic use case with messages being added to the tail of the queue.
However, there are a few other important use cases involving:
* Messages in delivery & rollbacks
* Scheduled messages
* Paging
However, before we get to those use cases let's look at the basic configuration of a ring queue.
== Configuration
There are 2 parameters related to ring queue configuration.
The `ring-size` parameter can be set directly on the `queue` element.
The default value comes from the `default-ring-size` `address-setting` (see below).
[,xml]
----
<addresses>
<address name="myRing">
<anycast>
<queue name="myRing" ring-size="3" />
</anycast>
</address>
</addresses>
----
The `default-ring-size` is an `address-setting` which applies to queues on matching addresses which don't have an explicit `ring-size` set.
This is especially useful for auto-created queues.
The default value is `-1` (i.e. no limit).
[,xml]
----
<address-settings>
<address-setting match="ring.#">
<default-ring-size>3</default-ring-size>
</address-setting>
</address-settings>
----
The `ring-size` may be updated at runtime.
If the new `ring-size` is set _lower_ than the previous `ring-size` the broker will not immediately delete enough messages from the head of the queue to enforce the new size.
New messages sent to the queue will force the deletion of old messages (i.e. the queue won't grow any larger), but the queue will not reach its new size until it does so _naturally_ through the normal consumption of messages by clients.
== Messages in Delivery & Rollbacks
When messages are "in delivery" they are in an in-between state where they are not technically on the queue but they are also not yet acknowledged.
The broker is at the consumer's mercy to either acknowledge such messages or not.
In the context of a ring queue, messages which are in-delivery cannot be removed from the queue.
This presents a few dilemmas.
Due to the nature of messages in delivery a client can actually send more messages to a ring queue than it would otherwise permit.
This can make it appear that the ring-size is not being enforced properly.
Consider this simple scenario:
* Queue `foo` with `ring-size="3"`
* 1 Consumer on queue `foo`
* Message `A` sent to `foo` & dispatched to consumer
* `messageCount`=1, `deliveringCount`=1
* Message `B` sent to `foo` & dispatched to consumer
* `messageCount`=2, `deliveringCount`=2
* Message `C` sent to `foo` & dispatched to consumer
* `messageCount`=3, `deliveringCount`=3
* Message `D` sent to `foo` & dispatched to consumer
* `messageCount`=4, `deliveringCount`=4
The `messageCount` for `foo` is now 4, one _greater_ than the `ring-size` of 3!
However, the broker has no choice but to allow this because it cannot remove messages from the queue which are in delivery.
Now consider that the consumer is closed without actually acknowledging any of these 4 messages.
These 4 in-delivery, unacknowledged messages will be cancelled back to the broker and added to the _head_ of the queue in the reverse order from which they were consumed.
This, of course, will put the queue over its configured `ring-size`.
Therefore, since a ring queue prefers messages at the tail of the queue over messages at the head it will keep `B`, `C`, & `D` and delete `A` (since `A` was the last message added to the head of the queue).
Transaction or core session rollbacks are treated the same way.
If you wish to avoid these kinds of situations and you're using the core client directly or the core JMS client you can minimize messages in delivery by reducing the size of `consumerWindowSize` (1024 * 1024 bytes by default).
== Scheduled Messages
When a scheduled message is sent to a queue it isn't immediately added to the tail of the queue like normal messages.
It is held in an intermediate buffer and scheduled for delivery onto the _head_ of the queue according to the details of the message.
However, scheduled messages are nevertheless reflected in the message count of the queue.
As with messages which are in delivery this can make it appear that the ring queue's size is not being enforced.
Consider this simple scenario:
* Queue `foo` with `ring-size="3"`
* At 12:00 message `A` sent to `foo` scheduled for 12:05
* `messageCount`=1, `scheduledCount`=1
* At 12:01 message `B` sent to `foo`
* `messageCount`=2, `scheduledCount`=1
* At 12:02 message `C` sent to `foo`
* `messageCount`=3, `scheduledCount`=1
* At 12:03 message `D` sent to `foo`
* `messageCount`=4, `scheduledCount`=1
The `messageCount` for `foo` is now 4, one _greater_ than the `ring-size` of 3!
However, the scheduled message is not technically on the queue yet (i.e. it is on the broker and scheduled to be put on the queue).
When the scheduled delivery time for 12:05 comes the message will put on the head of the queue, but since the ring queue's size has already been reach the scheduled message `A` will be removed.
== Paging
Similar to scheduled messages and messages in delivery, paged messages don't count against a ring queue's size because messages are actually paged at the _address_ level, not the queue level.
A paged message is not technically on a queue although it is reflected in a queue's `messageCount`.
It is recommended that paging is not used for addresses with ring queues.
In other words, ensure that the entire address will be able to fit into memory or use the `DROP`, `BLOCK` or `FAIL` `address-full-policy`.