2014-12-11 07:17:29 -05:00
|
|
|
# Message Grouping
|
2014-12-04 10:25:29 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message groups are sets of messages that have the following
|
|
|
|
characteristics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Messages in a message group share the same group id, i.e. they have
|
|
|
|
same group identifier property (`JMSXGroupID` for JMS,
|
2015-04-27 17:32:30 -04:00
|
|
|
`_AMQ_GROUP_ID` for Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Core API).
|
2014-12-04 10:25:29 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Messages in a message group are always consumed by the same
|
|
|
|
consumer, even if there are many consumers on a queue. They pin all
|
|
|
|
messages with the same group id to the same consumer. If that
|
|
|
|
consumer closes another consumer is chosen and will receive all
|
|
|
|
messages with the same group id.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message groups are useful when you want all messages for a certain value
|
|
|
|
of the property to be processed serially by the same consumer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An example might be orders for a certain stock. You may want orders for
|
|
|
|
any particular stock to be processed serially by the same consumer. To
|
|
|
|
do this you can create a pool of consumers (perhaps one for each stock,
|
|
|
|
but less will work too), then set the stock name as the value of the
|
2015-04-14 12:07:26 -04:00
|
|
|
_AMQ_GROUP_ID property.
|
2014-12-04 10:25:29 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This will ensure that all messages for a particular stock will always be
|
|
|
|
processed by the same consumer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> **Note**
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
> Grouped messages can impact the concurrent processing of non-grouped
|
|
|
|
> messages due to the underlying FIFO semantics of a queue. For example,
|
|
|
|
> if there is a chunk of 100 grouped messages at the head of a queue
|
|
|
|
> followed by 1,000 non-grouped messages then all the grouped messages
|
|
|
|
> will need to be sent to the appropriate client (which is consuming
|
|
|
|
> those grouped messages serially) before any of the non-grouped
|
|
|
|
> messages can be consumed. The functional impact in this scenario is a
|
|
|
|
> temporary suspension of concurrent message processing while all the
|
|
|
|
> grouped messages are processed. This can be a performance bottleneck
|
|
|
|
> so keep it in mind when determining the size of your message groups,
|
|
|
|
> and consider whether or not you should isolate your grouped messages
|
|
|
|
> from your non-grouped messages.
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-11 07:17:29 -05:00
|
|
|
## Using Core API
|
2014-12-04 10:25:29 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-14 12:07:26 -04:00
|
|
|
The property name used to identify the message group is `"_AMQ_GROUP_ID"`
|
2014-12-04 10:25:29 -05:00
|
|
|
(or the constant `MessageImpl.HDR_GROUP_ID`). Alternatively, you can set
|
|
|
|
`autogroup` to true on the `SessionFactory` which will pick a random
|
|
|
|
unique id.
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-11 07:17:29 -05:00
|
|
|
## Using JMS
|
2014-12-04 10:25:29 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The property name used to identify the message group is `JMSXGroupID`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// send 2 messages in the same group to ensure the same
|
|
|
|
// consumer will receive both
|
|
|
|
Message message = ...
|
|
|
|
message.setStringProperty("JMSXGroupID", "Group-0");
|
|
|
|
producer.send(message);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
message = ...
|
|
|
|
message.setStringProperty("JMSXGroupID", "Group-0");
|
|
|
|
producer.send(message);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, you can set `autogroup` to true on the
|
|
|
|
`ActiveMQConnectonFactory` which will pick a random unique id. This can
|
|
|
|
also be set in the JNDI context environment, e.g. `jndi.properties`.
|
|
|
|
Here's a simple example using the "ConnectionFactory" connection factory
|
|
|
|
which is available in the context by default
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-30 05:44:16 -04:00
|
|
|
java.naming.factory.initial=org.apache.activemq.artemis.jndi.ActiveMQInitialContextFactory
|
2015-02-25 08:37:19 -05:00
|
|
|
connectionFactory.myConnectionFactory=tcp://localhost:61616?autoGroup=true
|
2014-12-04 10:25:29 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternatively you can set the group id via the connection factory. All
|
|
|
|
messages sent with producers created via this connection factory will
|
|
|
|
set the `JMSXGroupID` to the specified value on all messages sent. This
|
|
|
|
can also be set in the JNDI context environment, e.g. `jndi.properties`.
|
|
|
|
Here's a simple example using the "ConnectionFactory" connection factory
|
|
|
|
which is available in the context by default:
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-30 05:44:16 -04:00
|
|
|
java.naming.factory.initial=org.apache.activemq.artemis.jndi.ActiveMQInitialContextFactory
|
2017-10-02 11:03:08 -04:00
|
|
|
connectionFactory.myConnectionFactory=tcp://localhost:61616?groupID=Group-0
|
2014-12-04 10:25:29 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-11 07:17:29 -05:00
|
|
|
## Example
|
2014-12-04 10:25:29 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2015-01-23 09:28:07 -05:00
|
|
|
See the [examples](examples.md} chapter for an example which shows how message groups are configured and used with JMS and via a connection factory.
|
2014-12-04 10:25:29 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-11 07:17:29 -05:00
|
|
|
## Clustered Grouping
|
2014-12-04 10:25:29 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using message groups in a cluster is a bit more complex. This is because
|
|
|
|
messages with a particular group id can arrive on any node so each node
|
|
|
|
needs to know about which group id's are bound to which consumer on
|
|
|
|
which node. The consumer handling messages for a particular group id may
|
|
|
|
be on a different node of the cluster, so each node needs to know this
|
|
|
|
information so it can route the message correctly to the node which has
|
|
|
|
that consumer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To solve this there is the notion of a grouping handler. Each node will
|
|
|
|
have its own grouping handler and when a messages is sent with a group
|
|
|
|
id assigned, the handlers will decide between them which route the
|
|
|
|
message should take.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are 2 types of handlers; Local and Remote. Each cluster should
|
|
|
|
choose 1 node to have a local grouping handler and all the other nodes
|
|
|
|
should have remote handlers- it's the local handler that actually makes
|
|
|
|
the decision as to what route should be used, all the other remote
|
|
|
|
handlers converse with this. Here is a sample config for both types of
|
2015-04-29 05:30:31 -04:00
|
|
|
handler, this should be configured in the *broker.xml*
|
2014-12-04 10:25:29 -05:00
|
|
|
file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<grouping-handler name="my-grouping-handler">
|
|
|
|
<type>LOCAL</type>
|
|
|
|
<address>jms</address>
|
|
|
|
<timeout>5000</timeout>
|
|
|
|
</grouping-handler>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<grouping-handler name="my-grouping-handler">
|
|
|
|
<type>REMOTE</type>
|
|
|
|
<address>jms</address>
|
|
|
|
<timeout>5000</timeout>
|
|
|
|
</grouping-handler>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The *address* attribute refers to a [cluster connection and the address
|
|
|
|
it uses](#clusters.address), refer to the clustering section on how to
|
|
|
|
configure clusters. The *timeout* attribute referees to how long to wait
|
|
|
|
for a decision to be made, an exception will be thrown during the send
|
|
|
|
if this timeout is reached, this ensures that strict ordering is kept.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decision as to where a message should be routed to is initially
|
|
|
|
proposed by the node that receives the message. The node will pick a
|
|
|
|
suitable route as per the normal clustered routing conditions, i.e.
|
|
|
|
round robin available queues, use a local queue first and choose a queue
|
|
|
|
that has a consumer. If the proposal is accepted by the grouping
|
|
|
|
handlers the node will route messages to this queue from that point on,
|
|
|
|
if rejected an alternative route will be offered and the node will again
|
|
|
|
route to that queue indefinitely. All other nodes will also route to the
|
|
|
|
queue chosen at proposal time. Once the message arrives at the queue
|
|
|
|
then normal single server message group semantics take over and the
|
|
|
|
message is pinned to a consumer on that queue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may have noticed that there is a single point of failure with the
|
|
|
|
single local handler. If this node crashes then no decisions will be
|
|
|
|
able to be made. Any messages sent will be not be delivered and an
|
|
|
|
exception thrown. To avoid this happening Local Handlers can be
|
|
|
|
replicated on another backup node. Simple create your back up node and
|
|
|
|
configure it with the same Local handler.
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-11 07:17:29 -05:00
|
|
|
## Clustered Grouping Best Practices
|
2014-12-04 10:25:29 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some best practices should be followed when using clustered grouping:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Make sure your consumers are distributed evenly across the different
|
|
|
|
nodes if possible. This is only an issue if you are creating and
|
|
|
|
closing consumers regularly. Since messages are always routed to the
|
|
|
|
same queue once pinned, removing a consumer from this queue may
|
|
|
|
leave it with no consumers meaning the queue will just keep
|
|
|
|
receiving the messages. Avoid closing consumers or make sure that
|
|
|
|
you always have plenty of consumers, i.e., if you have 3 nodes have
|
|
|
|
3 consumers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Use durable queues if possible. If queues are removed once a group
|
|
|
|
is bound to it, then it is possible that other nodes may still try
|
|
|
|
to route messages to it. This can be avoided by making sure that the
|
|
|
|
queue is deleted by the session that is sending the messages. This
|
|
|
|
means that when the next message is sent it is sent to the node
|
|
|
|
where the queue was deleted meaning a new proposal can successfully
|
|
|
|
take place. Alternatively you could just start using a different
|
|
|
|
group id.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Always make sure that the node that has the Local Grouping Handler
|
|
|
|
is replicated. These means that on failover grouping will still
|
|
|
|
occur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. In case you are using group-timeouts, the remote node should have a
|
|
|
|
smaller group-timeout with at least half of the value on the main
|
|
|
|
coordinator. This is because this will determine how often the
|
|
|
|
last-time-use value should be updated with a round trip for a
|
|
|
|
request to the group between the nodes.
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-11 07:17:29 -05:00
|
|
|
## Clustered Grouping Example
|
2014-12-04 10:25:29 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-13 06:12:07 -04:00
|
|
|
See the [examples](examples.md) chapter for an example of how to configure message groups with a ActiveMQ Artemis Cluster.
|