Apache
/
activemq-artemis
mirror of https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

ARTEMIS-1545 Adding HornetQ 2.4.7 on the mesh to validate send-acks

This commit is contained in:
Clebert Suconic 2017-12-19 14:44:52 -05:00
parent 9b982b3e30
commit 8f5b7a1e73
2 changed files with 5 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

3
artemis-core-client/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/protocol/core/impl/PacketImpl.java
View File

@ -29,7 +29,10 @@ public class PacketImpl implements Packet {
// Constants ------------------------------------------------------------------------- // Constants -------------------------------------------------------------------------
// 2.0.0
public static final int ADDRESSING_CHANGE_VERSION = 129; public static final int ADDRESSING_CHANGE_VERSION = 129;
// 2.5.0
public static final int ASYNC_RESPONSE_CHANGE_VERSION = 130; public static final int ASYNC_RESPONSE_CHANGE_VERSION = 130;

2
tests/compatibility-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/compatibility/SendAckTest.java
View File

@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith; import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized; import org.junit.runners.Parameterized;
import static org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.compatibility.GroovyRun.HORNETQ_247;
import static org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.compatibility.GroovyRun.ONE_FOUR; import static org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.compatibility.GroovyRun.ONE_FOUR;
import static org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.compatibility.GroovyRun.SNAPSHOT; import static org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.compatibility.GroovyRun.SNAPSHOT;
import static org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.compatibility.GroovyRun.TWO_FOUR; import static org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.compatibility.GroovyRun.TWO_FOUR;
@ -61,6 +62,7 @@ public class SendAckTest extends VersionedBaseTest {
// not every combination on two four would make sense.. as there's a compatibility issue between 2.4 and 1.4 when crossing consumers and producers // not every combination on two four would make sense.. as there's a compatibility issue between 2.4 and 1.4 when crossing consumers and producers
combinations.add(new Object[]{TWO_FOUR, SNAPSHOT, SNAPSHOT}); combinations.add(new Object[]{TWO_FOUR, SNAPSHOT, SNAPSHOT});
combinations.add(new Object[]{SNAPSHOT, TWO_FOUR, TWO_FOUR}); combinations.add(new Object[]{SNAPSHOT, TWO_FOUR, TWO_FOUR});
combinations.add(new Object[]{HORNETQ_247, SNAPSHOT, SNAPSHOT});
return combinations; return combinations;
} }