ARTEMIS-1322 ServerLocator option to ignore topology for load-balancing
This commit is contained in:
parent
64783c2504
commit
b6b8fa411f
|
@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ public final class ActiveMQClient {
|
|||
|
||||
public static final String DEFAULT_CORE_PROTOCOL = "CORE";
|
||||
|
||||
public static final boolean DEFAULT_USE_TOPOLOGY_FOR_LOADBALANCING = true;
|
||||
|
||||
public static final String THREAD_POOL_MAX_SIZE_PROPERTY_KEY = "activemq.artemis.client.global.thread.pool.max.size";
|
||||
|
||||
public static final String SCHEDULED_THREAD_POOL_SIZE_PROPERTY_KEY = "activemq.artemis.client.global.scheduled.thread.pool.core.size";
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -728,6 +728,16 @@ public interface ServerLocator extends AutoCloseable {
|
|||
@Override
|
||||
void close();
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param useTopologyForLoadBalancing
|
||||
* @return
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ServerLocator setUseTopologyForLoadBalancing(boolean useTopologyForLoadBalancing);
|
||||
|
||||
boolean getUseTopologyForLoadBalancing();
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Exposes the Topology used by this ServerLocator.
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -207,6 +207,8 @@ public final class ServerLocatorImpl implements ServerLocatorInternal, Discovery
|
|||
|
||||
private TransportConfiguration clusterTransportConfiguration;
|
||||
|
||||
private boolean useTopologyForLoadBalancing;
|
||||
|
||||
private final Exception traceException = new Exception();
|
||||
|
||||
// To be called when there are ServerLocator being finalized.
|
||||
|
@ -393,6 +395,8 @@ public final class ServerLocatorImpl implements ServerLocatorInternal, Discovery
|
|||
compressLargeMessage = ActiveMQClient.DEFAULT_COMPRESS_LARGE_MESSAGES;
|
||||
|
||||
clusterConnection = false;
|
||||
|
||||
useTopologyForLoadBalancing = ActiveMQClient.DEFAULT_USE_TOPOLOGY_FOR_LOADBALANCING;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public static ServerLocator newLocator(String uri) {
|
||||
|
@ -524,6 +528,7 @@ public final class ServerLocatorImpl implements ServerLocatorInternal, Discovery
|
|||
groupID = locator.groupID;
|
||||
nodeID = locator.nodeID;
|
||||
clusterTransportConfiguration = locator.clusterTransportConfiguration;
|
||||
useTopologyForLoadBalancing = locator.useTopologyForLoadBalancing;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private TransportConfiguration selectConnector() {
|
||||
|
@ -534,8 +539,7 @@ public final class ServerLocatorImpl implements ServerLocatorInternal, Discovery
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
synchronized (this) {
|
||||
// if the topologyArray is null, we will use the initialConnectors
|
||||
if (usedTopology != null) {
|
||||
if (usedTopology != null && useTopologyForLoadBalancing) {
|
||||
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
|
||||
logger.trace("Selecting connector from topology.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -544,7 +548,6 @@ public final class ServerLocatorImpl implements ServerLocatorInternal, Discovery
|
|||
|
||||
return pair.getA();
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Get from initialconnectors
|
||||
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
|
||||
logger.trace("Selecting connector from initial connectors.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1564,6 +1567,17 @@ public final class ServerLocatorImpl implements ServerLocatorInternal, Discovery
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public ServerLocator setUseTopologyForLoadBalancing(boolean useTopologyForLoadBalancing) {
|
||||
this.useTopologyForLoadBalancing = useTopologyForLoadBalancing;
|
||||
return this;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public boolean getUseTopologyForLoadBalancing() {
|
||||
return useTopologyForLoadBalancing;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public Topology getTopology() {
|
||||
return topology;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1138,6 +1138,7 @@ public abstract class ActiveMQTestBase extends Assert {
|
|||
for (TopologyMemberImpl member : topology.getMembers()) {
|
||||
if (member.getLive() != null) {
|
||||
liveNodesCount++;
|
||||
ActiveMQServerLogger.LOGGER.info("Found live server connected to " + server.getNodeID());
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (member.getBackup() != null) {
|
||||
backupNodesCount++;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -16,10 +16,79 @@
|
|||
*/
|
||||
package org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.integration.cluster.distribution;
|
||||
|
||||
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.core.client.ActiveMQClient;
|
||||
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.core.client.ClientSessionFactory;
|
||||
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.core.client.ServerLocator;
|
||||
import org.junit.Test;
|
||||
|
||||
public class NettySymmetricClusterTest extends SymmetricClusterTest {
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
protected boolean isNetty() {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testConnectionLoadBalancingUsingInitialConnectors() throws Exception {
|
||||
final String ADDRESS = "queues.testaddress";
|
||||
final String QUEUE = "queue0";
|
||||
final String URL = "(tcp://localhost:61616,tcp://localhost:61617)?useTopologyForLoadBalancing=false";
|
||||
final int CONNECTION_COUNT = 50;
|
||||
|
||||
setupCluster();
|
||||
|
||||
startServers();
|
||||
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
|
||||
setupSessionFactory(i, isNetty());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
|
||||
createQueue(i, ADDRESS, QUEUE, null, false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
|
||||
addConsumer(i, i, QUEUE, null);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
|
||||
waitForBindings(i, ADDRESS, 1, 1, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
|
||||
waitForBindings(i, ADDRESS, 4, 4, false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int[] baseline = new int[5];
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
|
||||
baseline[i] = servers[i].getActiveMQServerControl().getConnectionCount();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ClientSessionFactory[] clientSessionFactories = new ClientSessionFactory[CONNECTION_COUNT];
|
||||
ServerLocator locator = ActiveMQClient.createServerLocator(URL);
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < CONNECTION_COUNT; i++) {
|
||||
clientSessionFactories[i] = addSessionFactory(locator.createSessionFactory());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Since we are only using the initial connectors to load-balance then all the connections should be on the first 2 nodes.
|
||||
* Note: This still uses the load-balancing-policy so this would changed if we used the random one instead of the default
|
||||
* round-robin one.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
assertEquals(CONNECTION_COUNT / 2, (servers[0].getActiveMQServerControl().getConnectionCount() - baseline[0]));
|
||||
assertEquals(CONNECTION_COUNT / 2, (servers[1].getActiveMQServerControl().getConnectionCount() - baseline[1]));
|
||||
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < CONNECTION_COUNT; i++) {
|
||||
clientSessionFactories[i].close();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
locator.setUseTopologyForLoadBalancing(true);
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < CONNECTION_COUNT; i++) {
|
||||
clientSessionFactories[i] = addSessionFactory(locator.createSessionFactory());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
|
||||
assertTrue((servers[i].getActiveMQServerControl().getConnectionCount() - baseline[i]) < (CONNECTION_COUNT / 2));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue