ARTEMIS-2016 fix flaky test QueueControlTest#testRemoveAllWithPagingMode
Parameters going into Wait.waitFor were originally wrong, because `durationMillis: 3, sleepMillis: 100` means you would test the condition only once. This commit is changing the durationMillis from 3ms to 3s, swapping the two numbers (duration 100ms, sleep 3ms) would also be reasonable, I think. Next, Wait.assertEquals is here being used, instead of Assert.assertTrue. I saw the test fail only once, and never was able to reproduce it again, but I think this commit does improve the test and so it is worthwhile. java.lang.AssertionError at org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.integration.management.QueueControlTest.assertMetrics(QueueControlTest.java:2651) at org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.integration.management.QueueControlTest.assertMessageMetrics(QueueControlTest.java:2615) at org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.integration.management.QueueControlTest.testRemoveAllWithPagingMode(QueueControlTest.java:1554)
This commit is contained in:
parent
9109fc1604
commit
c1a191c547
|
@ -52,7 +52,11 @@ public class Wait {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public static void assertEquals(long size, LongCondition condition, long timeout) throws Exception {
|
||||
boolean result = waitFor(() -> condition.getCount() == size, timeout);
|
||||
assertEquals(size, condition, timeout, SLEEP_MILLIS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public static void assertEquals(Long size, LongCondition condition, long timeout, long sleepMillis) throws Exception {
|
||||
boolean result = waitFor(() -> condition.getCount() == size, timeout, sleepMillis);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!result) {
|
||||
Assert.fail(size + " != " + condition.getCount());
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2632,25 +2632,25 @@ public class QueueControlTest extends ManagementTestBase {
|
|||
Supplier<Number> durableCount, Supplier<Number> durableSize) throws Exception {
|
||||
|
||||
//make sure count stat equals message count
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(Wait.waitFor(() -> count.get().longValue() == messageCount, 3, 100));
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(Wait.waitFor(() -> count.get().longValue() == messageCount, 3 * 1000, 100));
|
||||
|
||||
if (messageCount > 0) {
|
||||
//verify size stat greater than 0
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(Wait.waitFor(() -> size.get().longValue() > 0, 3, 100));
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(Wait.waitFor(() -> size.get().longValue() > 0, 3 * 1000, 100));
|
||||
|
||||
//If durable then make sure durable count and size are correct
|
||||
if (durable) {
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(Wait.waitFor(() -> durableCount.get().longValue() == messageCount, 3, 100));
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(Wait.waitFor(() -> durableSize.get().longValue() > 0, 3, 100));
|
||||
Wait.assertEquals(messageCount, () -> durableCount.get().longValue(), 3 * 1000, 100);
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(Wait.waitFor(() -> durableSize.get().longValue() > 0, 3 * 1000, 100));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(Wait.waitFor(() -> durableCount.get().longValue() == 0, 3, 100));
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(Wait.waitFor(() -> durableSize.get().longValue() == 0, 3, 100));
|
||||
Wait.assertEquals(0L, () -> durableCount.get().longValue(), 3 * 1000, 100);
|
||||
Wait.assertEquals(0L, () -> durableSize.get().longValue(), 3 * 1000, 100);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(Wait.waitFor(() -> count.get().longValue() == 0, 3, 100));
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(Wait.waitFor(() -> durableCount.get().longValue() == 0, 3, 100));
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(Wait.waitFor(() -> size.get().longValue() == 0, 3, 100));
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(Wait.waitFor(() -> durableSize.get().longValue() == 0, 3, 100));
|
||||
Wait.assertEquals(0L, () -> count.get().longValue(), 3 * 1000, 100);
|
||||
Wait.assertEquals(0L, () -> durableCount.get().longValue(), 3 * 1000, 100);
|
||||
Wait.assertEquals(0L, () -> size.get().longValue(), 3 * 1000, 100);
|
||||
Wait.assertEquals(0L, () -> durableSize.get().longValue(), 3 * 1000, 100);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue