There is an optimization in AMQP, that properties are only parsed over demand.
It happens that after ARTEMIS-2294 (commit 2dd0671698),
every send would request for the property on the message, resulting the properties to always be parsed upon send.
Even when there's no use of application properties.
This is a surprisingly large change just to fix some log messages, but
the changes were necessary in order to get the relevant data to where it
was being logged. The fact that the data wasn't readily available is
probably why it wasn't logged in the first place.
Add a paged message to the tail, when the QueueIterateAction doesn't handle it, to avoid removing unhandled paged message. Move the refRemoved calls from the QueueIterateActions to the iterQueue to fix the queue stats.
When AMQPMessages are redistributed from one node to
another, the internal property of message is not
cleaned up and this causes a message to be routed
to a same queue more than once, causing duplicated
messages.
If a broker loses its file lock on the journal and doesn't notice (e.g.
network connection failure to an NFS mount) then it can continue to run
after its backup activates resulting in split-brain.
This commit implements periodic journal lock evaluation so that if a live
server loses its lock it will automatically restart itself.
This commit introduces the ability to configure a downstream connection
for federation. This works by sending information to the remote broker
and that broker will parse the message and create a new upstream back
to the original broker.
A new feature to preserve messages sent to an address for queues that will be
created on the address in the future. This is essentially equivalent to the
"retroactive consumer" feature from 5.x. However, it's implemented in a way
that fits with the address model of Artemis.
The parameter failoverOnInitialConnection wouldn't seem to be used and
makes no sense any more, because the connectors are retried in a loop.
So someone can just add the backup in the initial connection.
In LargeMessageImpl.copy(long) it need to open the underlying
file in order to read and copy bytes into the new copied message.
However there is a chance that another thread can come in and close
the file in the middle, making the copy failed
with "channel is null" error.
This is happening in cases where a large message is sent to a jms
topic (multicast address). During delivery it to multiple
subscribers, some consumer is doing delivery and closed the
underlying file after. Some other consumer is rolling back
the messages and eventually move it to DLQ (which will call
the above copy method). So there is a chance this bug being hit on.
The crititical analyser trigger the broker shutdown if try to
removeAllMessages with a huge queue. The iterQueue is split so as
not to keep the lock too time.
When CoreMessage is doing copyHeadersAndProperties() it doesn't
make a full copy of its properties (a TypedProperties object).
It will cause problem when multiple threads/parties are modifying the
properties of the copied messages from the same message.
This will be particular bad if the message is a large message
where moveHeadersAndProperties is being used.
It use RandomAccessFile to allow using heap buffers without additional
copies and/or leaks of direct buffers, as performed by FileChannel JDK
implementation (see https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8147468)
Keith Wall
Justin Bertram
Christopher L. Shannon (cshannon)
Clebert Suconic
Wei Yang
brusdev
Howard Gao
Bas Elzinga
Andy Taylor
michael.pearce
Francesco Nigro