Lots of work on the test-suite in this commit including:
- Rename ServiceTestBase to ActiveMQTestBase
- Make AddressSettings fluent
- Remove unnecessary tearDown() implementations
- Use ActiveMQTestBase.create*Locator() instead of
ActiveMQClient.createServerLocator*(..)
- Use fluent ServerLocator methods
- Make sure all ActiveMQServers.newActiveMQServer invocations
are surrounded with addServer() where appropriate
- Create a few example tests to be references from hacking-guide
- Update hacking-guide with more info on writing tests
- Refactor config creation methods in ActiveMQTestBase
This has bothered me for awhile, but writing the hacking guide has
given me an opportunity to refactor some of our test-suite to be
simpler, more consistent, and easier to understand. This is
important if we want users to provide well-written tests. Our
test-suite is an important part of the code-base and it should be
easy to write good tests.
Basically I just consolidated CoreUnitTestCase, UnitTestCase, and
ServiceTestBase into a single class named ServiceTestBase. I also
simplified some of the configuration creation methods to reduce
duplicated code.
This commit is a simple mv of the files.. We required two commits to preserve history,
one to git mv, one for the actual changes...
otherwise history would be lost
Based on the Apache ActiveMQ community vote this project is being
renamed "Artemis."
When sending a large message that exceeds the size of
Integer.MAX_VALUE, the bridge will get negative chunk size during
fowarding. And the resend cache is not limited so there is a
potential that it may get OutOfMemory exception.
this is basically addressing a performance issue on OpenWire, setting the auto-create to the PostOffice
after not being able to route
The core protocol stays the same in regard to the auto-create since the exceptions are happening after the queueQuery
Sometimes /tmp doesn't support ext4 (tmpfs) and there's always a risk of leaving unnatended files in cases of crashed.
This is in alignment with how other tests run at apache
If a Transaction wasn't created, the case for duplciate Detection would cancel a transaction that never happened
and it would get a NPE instead of a TX Exception.
It wasn't a big deal as the client got an exception anyways and the users were able to cancel in that case
but the message sent was a string containing just "Null".
this will fix it with a proper handling
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-95
The message.copy is broken when you set persistence=false, and the bridge will use that method before forwarding the message
this commit is fixing NullStorageLargeServerMessage.copy and adding the proper testcase to validate the fix
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-89
I have done a lot of refactoring on this. So we can a different version of the interceptor for each protocol based on a base class now.
Just an abstract class over Stomp would be a bit hacky... this is a better approach.
