This is a Large commit where I am refactoring largeMessage Body out of CoreMessage
which is now reused with AMQP.
I had also to fix Reference Counting to fix how Large Messages are Acked
And I also had to make sure Large Messages are transversing correctly when in cluster.
It use RandomAccessFile to allow using heap buffers without additional
copies and/or leaks of direct buffers, as performed by FileChannel JDK
implementation (see https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8147468)
Add max record size check before adding a record to prevent that the
broker shuts down, when there is one really large header sent with the
message. Add message size check before allocating large message resource
if it can't be stored.
Refactored thread local ByteBuffer pooling, alignment
and zeroing in order to avoid duplicate code and
improve code coverage with tests.
In addition are being provided faster branchless
alignment operations and optional zeroing of
pooled ByteBuffers for both ASYNCIO and
NIO/MAPPED journal types.
Large messages pendingRecordID is not accessed atomically, leading
to races that would lead to records that cannot been found on the
journal for deletion: it would lead to cause NPE that won't clean
the pending tasks on the current OperationContextImpl.
Adding a cleanup on error of those tasks and avoiding the race
to happen by adding proper synchronization will both enforce
correct clean up when something bad happen and avoid NPE.
Compaction is now reusing direct ByteBuffers on both
reading and writing with explicit and deterministic
release to avoid high peak of native memory utilisation
after compaction.
Compaction cannot free a sliced view of a ByteBuffer on Java >=9:
the fix is using the original ByteBuffer instead of the slice
to perform a file write and allow it to be correctly released by
the Cleaner.
The method is named "lookupRecord".
"lookupRecord" seems to find a related record.
But the method is checking whether recordsSnapshot contains the id or not.
Thus, the method name "containsRecord" is more intuitive than "lookupRecord".