Add the config parameter `page-sync-timeout` to set a customized value,
because if the broker is configured to use ASYNCIO journal, the timeout
has the same value of NIO default journal buffer timeout ie 3333333.
The iterQueue transaction commits are locked by the synchronization
context. So removing all messages from a huge queue causes the creation
of too locked transactions for the paged messages and so OOM.
The iteration on paged message is executed out the iterQueue
synchronization context to avoid to lock the transaction commits.
Active Directory servers are unable to handle referrals automatically.
This causes a PartialResultException to be thrown if a referral is
encountered beneath the base search DN, even if the LDAPLoginModule is
set to ignore referrals.
This option may be set to 'true' to ignore these exceptions, allowing
login to proceed with the query results received before the exception
was encountered.
Note: there are no tests for this change as I could not reproduce the
issue with the ApacheDS test server. The issue is specific to directory
servers that don't support the ManageDsaIT control such as Active
Directory.
A new feature to preserve messages sent to an address for queues that will be
created on the address in the future. This is essentially equivalent to the
"retroactive consumer" feature from 5.x. However, it's implemented in a way
that fits with the address model of Artemis.
Improve wildcard support for the key attribute in the roles access
match element and whitelist entry element, allowing prefix match for
the mBean properties.
The parameter failoverOnInitialConnection wouldn't seem to be used and
makes no sense any more, because the connectors are retried in a loop.
So someone can just add the backup in the initial connection.
In LargeMessageImpl.copy(long) it need to open the underlying
file in order to read and copy bytes into the new copied message.
However there is a chance that another thread can come in and close
the file in the middle, making the copy failed
with "channel is null" error.
This is happening in cases where a large message is sent to a jms
topic (multicast address). During delivery it to multiple
subscribers, some consumer is doing delivery and closed the
underlying file after. Some other consumer is rolling back
the messages and eventually move it to DLQ (which will call
the above copy method). So there is a chance this bug being hit on.