This commit is a simple mv of the files.. We required two commits to preserve history,
one to git mv, one for the actual changes...
otherwise history would be lost
Based on the Apache ActiveMQ community vote this project is being
renamed "Artemis."
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-7
Connection Factory is now externalizable and is now serialized as a string that represents a URI. There are schemas for every possible type for connection factory and server locator.
The client JNDI representation of factories has also been changed to be consistent with this.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-67
fixed distribution so that file based security works and hot deployers as broken and no longer needed with new bootstrap.
Also combined the jms and core configuration files.
- added missing license headers found by maven rat plugin.
most of them added automatically via apache-rat
a few manually added
- added apache-rat maven plugin to the build cycle
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-3
We are renaming packages from activemq6 to activemq as that's more generic and version independent
The previous commit renamed the directories. On this commit now I'm changing the code.
If we changed the code and the directories on the same commit git would remove and add a lot of files
without recognizing the renames.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-3
We are renaming packages from activemq6 to activemq as that's more generic and version independent
On this first commit I'm just renaming the directories otherwise the history would be lost. The next commit will rename the text on the directories.
If I squash these two commits git will make us delete / add again.
Martyn Taylor
jbertram
Clebert Suconic
jbertram
Andy Taylor
Howard Gao