A transaction manager is only required on the JMSBridge when the QoS
level is set to ONCE_AND_ONCE_ONLY. Previous to the this patch it was
also checking for a TM on the AT_MOST_ONCE QoS level. This patch also
ensures that the TM is set to null after each test run.
These tests were not as broken as on 2.3.x from the old hornetq branch where this fix originated.
However I will play safe here as I believe the race could be after the exception is raised and before the counter was added
(on ActiveMQMessageHandlerTest)
Implements a feature whereby the broker will not shutdown while there are
clients connected. A timeout can be specified so that even if there are
clients connected the broker will still shutdown after a certain time.
This patch moves test dependencies into out of the main pom and into the
tests module pom. This will make managing 3rd party category X
dependencies much easier going forward. In addition each dependency
license has been outlined in the pom and README entry added to outline
future policy when adding 3rd party depdendencies.
Some of the OutgoingConnection and RA tests were failing due to a
previous transaction being present when using the Arjuna TM. This patch
adds methods to allow tests which TM to use and ensures that Dummy TM is
cleaned up each after each test.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-67
fixed distribution so that file based security works and hot deployers as broken and no longer needed with new bootstrap.
Also combined the jms and core configuration files.
Implements a new feature for the broker whereby it may automatically
create and delete JMS queues which are not explicitly defined through
the management API or file-based configuration. A JMS queue is created
in response to a sent message or connected consumer. The queue may
subsequently be deleted when it no longer has any messages and
consumers. Auto-creation and auto-deletion can both be turned on/off
via address-setting.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-68
The logic on transferring method is a bit complex, where
I found a better way to calculate the targetIDs.
This will also fix a few ScaleDownTests
I also added some extra tests using ScaleDownDirect
This example requires a Transaction Manager implementation to run. As
we are not shipping with an appropriate Transaction Manager this is
being removed.
jbertram
Martyn Taylor
Andy Taylor
Andy Taylor
Clebert Suconic