In Page.write(final PagedMessage message) if the page file is closed
it returns silently. The caller has no way to know that if the message
is paged to file or not. It should throw an exception so that the
caller can handle it correctly.
This causes random failure PagingTest#testExpireLargeMessageOnPaging().
The test shows that when the server stops it closes the page file.
In the mean time a message is expired to the expiry queue and if
the expiry queue is in paging mode, it goes to Page.write() and
returns without any error. The result is that the message is removed
from the original queue and not added to the expiry queue.
If we throw exception here it makes the expiration failed, the message
will not be removed from the orginal queue. Next time broker is started,
the message will be reloaded and expired again. no message lost.
Add consumer priority support
Includes refactor of consumer iterating in QueueImpl to its own logical class, to be able to implement.
Add OpenWire JMS Test - taken from ActiveMQ5
Add Core JMS Test
Add AMQP Test
Add Docs
When broker's advisory is disabled (supportAdvisory=false) any
advisory consumer won't get created at broker and the advisory
consumer ID won't be stored.
Legacy openwire clients can have a reference of advisory consumer
regardless broker's settings and therefore when it closes the
advisory consumer the broker has no reference to it.
Therefore broker throws an exception like:
javax.jms.IllegalStateException: Cannot
remove a consumer that had not been registered
If the broker stores the consumer info (even it doesn't create
it) the exception can be avoided.
Because Sun's URLClassLoader never closes it's jar file handles
Jetty doesn't cleanup is temp web dir after Artemis broker shut
down normally on Windows.
To work around this a new process is forked before broker VM
exits to clean up the tmp dir if they are not deleted. The
new process out lives the main VM so that those jar's handles
are released and the temp dir can be cleaned up.
There's a *slight* semantic change with the behavior of the queue query
and binding query to make them consistent with the address query, namely
that they will return the name of the queue and the name of the address
in every case and the returned names will be not use the FQQN syntax but
will be parsed to reflect their actual names in the broker.
There were two different but nearly identical implementations of
createQueue(). I consolidated these into a single method. There should
be no semantic differences.
Howard Gao
Clebert Suconic
Justin Bertram
Michael André Pearce
Luis De Bello
Francesco Nigro
andytaylor
Martyn Taylor
Emmanuel Hugonnet
yang wei