I am adding an option sync=true or false on mirror. if sync, any client blocking operation will wait a roundtrip to the mirror
acting like a sync replica.
Adds support for standard Java TLS and ActiveMQ Artemis-specific override
encrypted system property values for the key store and trust store
passwords, including a separate codec property
- From now on we will save snapshots of page-counters on the journal (basically for compatibility with previous verions).
And we will recount the records on startup.
- While the rebuild is being done the value from the previous snapshot is still available with current updates.
when cancelling a large number of messages, the addSorted could be holding a lock for too long causing the server to crash under CriticalAnalyzer
co-authored: AntonRoskvist <anton.roskvist@volvo.com> (discovering the issue and providing the test ClientCrashMassiveRollbackTest.java)
- optimize startup time on paging (check-depage on startup)
- otpimize getNextPage() on complete pages
- optimize getFirstMessage() and paging. (avoid iterator usage)
Attempt to standardize all Logger declaration to a singular variable name
which makes the code more consistent and make finding usages of loggers in
the code a bit easier.
Logger statements should use formatting syntax and let the normal framework checks take care of
checking if a logger is enabled instead of string concats and isXEnabled logger checks except
in cases there is known expense to the specifc logging message/arg preparation or passing.
Changes from myself and Robbie Gemmell.
Co-authored-by: Robbie Gemmell <robbie@apache.org>
By allowing to pass caller's classname directly to org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.ActiveMQThreadFactory#defaultThreadFactory instead of calculating it from stack.
Running HorizontalPagingTest with these variables would make the test to fail unless these changes are applied.
export TEST_HORIZONTAL_SERVER_START_TIMEOUT=300000
export TEST_HORIZONTAL_TIMEOUT_MINUTES=120
export TEST_HORIZONTAL_PROTOCOL_LIST=OPENWIRE
export TEST_HORIZONTAL_OPENWIRE_DESTINATIONS=200
export TEST_HORIZONTAL_OPENWIRE_MESSAGES=1000
export TEST_HORIZONTAL_OPENWIRE_COMMIT_INTERVAL=100
export TEST_HORIZONTAL_OPENWIRE_RECEIVE_COMMIT_INTERVAL=0
export TEST_HORIZONTAL_OPENWIRE_MESSAGE_SIZE=20000
export TEST_HORIZONTAL_OPENWIRE_PARALLEL_SENDS=10
This is caused by too many entries on the HashMap for ThreadLocals.
Also: I'm reviewing some readlock usage on the StorageManager to simplify things a little bit.
Paging only removes files at the beginning of the stream...
Say you have paged files 1 through 1000...
if all the messages are ack, but one message on file 1 is missing an ack, all the 999 subsequent files would not be removed until all the messages on file 1 is ack.
This was working as engineered, but sometimes devs don't have complete control on their app.
With this improvement we will now remove messages in the middle of the stream as well.
There is also some improvement to how browsing and page work with this
As the test needs the generated jms jars to be verified I moved it from
unit-tests to smoke-tests.
Updated the test to look for the correct jars as the originally
specified does not exist.
Update the test to assert against Implementation-Version instead of
ActiveMQ-Version in the manifest file as the ActiveMQ-Version property does not exist.
When using a temporary queue with a `temporary-queue-namespace` the
`AddressSettings` lookup wasn't correct. This commit fixes that and
refactors `QueueImpl` a bit so that it holds a copy of its
`AddressSettings` rather than looking them up all the time. If any
relevant `AddressSettings` changes the
`HierarchicalRepositoryChangeListener` implementation will still
refresh the `QueueImpl` appropriately.
The `QueueControlImpl` was likewise changed to get the dead-letter
address and expiry address directly from the `QueueImpl` rather than
looking them up in the `AddressSettings` repository.
I modified some code that came from ARTEMIS-734, but I ran the test that
was associated with that Jira (i.e.
`o.a.a.a.t.i.c.d.ExpireWhileLoadBalanceTest`) and it passed so I think
that should be fine. There actually was no test included with the
original commit. One was added later so it's hard to say for sure it
exactly captures the original issue.