Currently a cluster bridge will continue to attempt to reconnect to
a node that sends it a DISCONNECT until its reconnect-attempts is
exhausted. A DISCONNECT message indicates that the node is not coming
back so no reconnect attempt should be made and the bridge should be
stopped, the bindings should be cleaned up, etc.
The change to this test exposes this problem.
this is just calling Idea format on all the files using the new style
I am separating manual changes from automatic changes in case I have to repeat the manual changes again
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-136
From what I researched from implementers of XA TM if you throw ERR over communication errors the transaction manager will create
an heuristic transaction to be manually dealt with.
Other XA Implementations (such as Oracle JDBC) are return FAIL over communication failures during any XA operation.
To reproduce this commit, apply a replace regex rule using:
search regex: /\*\*\n \* Licensed
replace: /\*\n \* Licensed
These files had to be changed manually:
artemis-selector/src/main/javacc/HyphenatedParser.jj
artemis-selector/src/main/javacc/StrictParser.jj
artemis-website/src/main/resources/styles/impact/css/pygmentize.css
artemis-website/src/main/resources/styles/impact/css/site.css
We had a few reported small issues on the codebase from the recent introduced google error prone.
This should eliminate any issues, and I am making sure these won't happen again
Lots of work on the test-suite in this commit including:
- Rename ServiceTestBase to ActiveMQTestBase
- Make AddressSettings fluent
- Remove unnecessary tearDown() implementations
- Use ActiveMQTestBase.create*Locator() instead of
ActiveMQClient.createServerLocator*(..)
- Use fluent ServerLocator methods
- Make sure all ActiveMQServers.newActiveMQServer invocations
are surrounded with addServer() where appropriate
- Create a few example tests to be references from hacking-guide
- Update hacking-guide with more info on writing tests
- Refactor config creation methods in ActiveMQTestBase
This has bothered me for awhile, but writing the hacking guide has
given me an opportunity to refactor some of our test-suite to be
simpler, more consistent, and easier to understand. This is
important if we want users to provide well-written tests. Our
test-suite is an important part of the code-base and it should be
easy to write good tests.
Basically I just consolidated CoreUnitTestCase, UnitTestCase, and
ServiceTestBase into a single class named ServiceTestBase. I also
simplified some of the configuration creation methods to reduce
duplicated code.
Clebert Suconic
Ville Skyttä
Erich Duda
Howard Gao
Miroslav Novak
Martyn Taylor
jbertram
Thiago Kronig