DelegatingSession class wraps ClientSessionImpl and attempts to close
session should it not be closed by the user. It does this by
implementing finalize. However, the order in which finalize runs can be
difficult to predict as compilers, and JIT compilers are able to
optimize early.
The current DelegatingSession was causing problems of finalize getting
called early (before consumers, producers were finished with the
session). This was causing tests to fail on the IBM JDK (which
optimizes early). The same happens on OpenJDK if the GC is forced.
Its now possible to also add the broker name to jmx tree avoiding clashes when multiple brokers are in a single vm. This is now the default but the old way can be used with some configuration
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-311
Ive renamed the current isSameHost method to isSameparams as thats what it checked and added a new method for isSameHost that checks the appropriate params for the connector. Ive changed ClientSessionFactoryImp to use this to correct the behaviour.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-292
When server sends disconnect to the client, the ClientSession schedules
a close task on it's ordered executor. Once the close method starts
it's waits to check to see if all jobs in it's executor has completed.
To do this it adds a job to it's ordered executor, once it is run it
knows there is nothing more to do and thus is ready to close. However,
this causes a deadlock as both jobs are running in the ordered executor
and thus are both waiting on each other. The close eventually timesout
which is why we see the logs as reported in the JIRA.
This commit runs the close method in it's own ordered executor, thus
preventing the two jobs blocking each other.
The failback process needs to be deterministic rather than relying on various
incarnations of Thread.sleep() at crucial points. Important aspects of this
change include:
1) Make the initial replication synchronization process block at the very
last step and wait for a response from the replica to ensure the replica has
as the necessary data. This is a critical piece of knowledge during the
failback process because it allows the soon-to-become-backup server to know
for sure when it can shut itself down and allow the soon-to-become-live
server to take over. Also, introduce a new configuration element called
"initial-replication-sync-timeout" to conrol how long this blocking will occur.
2) Set the state of the server as 'LIVE' only after the server is fully
started. This is necessary because once the soon-to-be-backup server shuts
down it needs to know that the soon-to-be-live server has started fully before
it restarts itself as the new backup. If the soon-to-be-backup server restarts
before the soon-to-be-live is fully started then it won't actually become a
backup server but instead will become a live server which will break the
failback process.
3) Wait to receive the announcement of a backup server before failing-back.
Netty 4.x uses pooled buffers. These buffers can run out of memory when
transferring large amounts of data over connection. This was causing an
OutOfMemory exception to be thrown on the CoreBridge when tranferring
large messages. Netty provides a callback handler to notify listeners
when a Connection is writable. This patch adds the ability to register
connection writable listeners to the Netty connection and registers the
relevant callback from the Bridge to avoid writing when the buffers are
full.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-217 fixing dead lock
This is using a separate lock for notifications, this way we won't hold a lock while communicating on netty which was the issue here.
Inbound sessions are always created from the same ActiveMQConnectionFactory
which means the load-balancing policy is applied to them in the expected
manner. However, outbound sessions are created from independent, unique
ActiveMQConnectionFactory instances which means that the load-balancing
doesn't follow the expected pattern.
This commit changes this behavior by caching each unique
ActiveMQConnectionFactory instance and using it for both inbound and outbound
sessions potentially. This ensures the sessions are load-balanced as
expected.
this is just calling Idea format on all the files using the new style
I am separating manual changes from automatic changes in case I have to repeat the manual changes again
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-142
I have previously exposed this exception as some errors were being hidden
Now that I have cleared those, It's best to remove this as some errors are now happening
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-136
From what I researched from implementers of XA TM if you throw ERR over communication errors the transaction manager will create
an heuristic transaction to be manually dealt with.
Other XA Implementations (such as Oracle JDBC) are return FAIL over communication failures during any XA operation.
"mvn install" now works without the lint, but a "mvn install javadoc:jar" still fails. Since that is what the release plugin uses, need to keep the lint there for now. Still lots of failures.
To reproduce this commit, apply a replace regex rule using:
search regex: /\*\*\n \* Licensed
replace: /\*\n \* Licensed
These files had to be changed manually:
artemis-selector/src/main/javacc/HyphenatedParser.jj
artemis-selector/src/main/javacc/StrictParser.jj
artemis-website/src/main/resources/styles/impact/css/pygmentize.css
artemis-website/src/main/resources/styles/impact/css/site.css
We had a few reported small issues on the codebase from the recent introduced google error prone.
This should eliminate any issues, and I am making sure these won't happen again
Lots of work on the test-suite in this commit including:
- Rename ServiceTestBase to ActiveMQTestBase
- Make AddressSettings fluent
- Remove unnecessary tearDown() implementations
- Use ActiveMQTestBase.create*Locator() instead of
ActiveMQClient.createServerLocator*(..)
- Use fluent ServerLocator methods
- Make sure all ActiveMQServers.newActiveMQServer invocations
are surrounded with addServer() where appropriate
- Create a few example tests to be references from hacking-guide
- Update hacking-guide with more info on writing tests
- Refactor config creation methods in ActiveMQTestBase
This has bothered me for awhile, but writing the hacking guide has
given me an opportunity to refactor some of our test-suite to be
simpler, more consistent, and easier to understand. This is
important if we want users to provide well-written tests. Our
test-suite is an important part of the code-base and it should be
easy to write good tests.
Basically I just consolidated CoreUnitTestCase, UnitTestCase, and
ServiceTestBase into a single class named ServiceTestBase. I also
simplified some of the configuration creation methods to reduce
duplicated code.
Clebert Suconic
Martyn Taylor
Andy Taylor
Ville Skyttä
Stuart Douglas
jbertram
Ivo Studensky
Petter Nordlander
Julian Scheid
Otavio Rodolfo Piske
John D. Ament
Daniel Kulp
Thiago Kronig