Implements a new feature for the broker whereby it may automatically create and
delete JMS topics which are not explicitly defined through the management API
or file-based configuration. A JMS topic is created in response to a sent
message or connected subscriber. The topic may subsequently be deleted when it
no longer has any subscribers. Auto-creation and auto-deletion can both be
turned on/off via address-setting.
The old property-file based security manager shouldn't be used anymore. Instead
use the JAAS InVMLoginModule for in-vm tests, embedded use-cases, etc. and use
the other JAAS login modules for normal server use-cases.
this is just calling Idea format on all the files using the new style
I am separating manual changes from automatic changes in case I have to repeat the manual changes again
To reproduce this commit, apply a replace regex rule using:
search regex: /\*\*\n \* Licensed
replace: /\*\n \* Licensed
These files had to be changed manually:
artemis-selector/src/main/javacc/HyphenatedParser.jj
artemis-selector/src/main/javacc/StrictParser.jj
artemis-website/src/main/resources/styles/impact/css/pygmentize.css
artemis-website/src/main/resources/styles/impact/css/site.css
We had a few reported small issues on the codebase from the recent introduced google error prone.
This should eliminate any issues, and I am making sure these won't happen again
Lots of work on the test-suite in this commit including:
- Rename ServiceTestBase to ActiveMQTestBase
- Make AddressSettings fluent
- Remove unnecessary tearDown() implementations
- Use ActiveMQTestBase.create*Locator() instead of
ActiveMQClient.createServerLocator*(..)
- Use fluent ServerLocator methods
- Make sure all ActiveMQServers.newActiveMQServer invocations
are surrounded with addServer() where appropriate
- Create a few example tests to be references from hacking-guide
- Update hacking-guide with more info on writing tests
- Refactor config creation methods in ActiveMQTestBase
This has bothered me for awhile, but writing the hacking guide has
given me an opportunity to refactor some of our test-suite to be
simpler, more consistent, and easier to understand. This is
important if we want users to provide well-written tests. Our
test-suite is an important part of the code-base and it should be
easy to write good tests.
Basically I just consolidated CoreUnitTestCase, UnitTestCase, and
ServiceTestBase into a single class named ServiceTestBase. I also
simplified some of the configuration creation methods to reduce
duplicated code.
Martyn Taylor
jbertram
Ville Skyttä
Clebert Suconic
Thiago Kronig