From 35e088856d752debe99701e48654c24c6ac97422 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James Strachan <jstrachan@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:49:25 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] added comment - I'd have thought a Map was better?

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk@381612 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
---
 .../main/java/org/apache/activemq/ActiveMQSessionExecutor.java | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/activemq-core/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/ActiveMQSessionExecutor.java b/activemq-core/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/ActiveMQSessionExecutor.java
index 6a30f1f8f4..af3dda84ef 100755
--- a/activemq-core/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/ActiveMQSessionExecutor.java
+++ b/activemq-core/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/ActiveMQSessionExecutor.java
@@ -86,6 +86,9 @@ public class ActiveMQSessionExecutor implements Task {
     }
     
     void dispatch(MessageDispatch message){
+
+        // TODO  - we should use a Map for this indexed by consumerId
+        
         for (Iterator i = this.session.consumers.iterator(); i.hasNext();) {
             ActiveMQMessageConsumer consumer = (ActiveMQMessageConsumer) i.next();
             ConsumerId consumerId = message.getConsumerId();