diff --git a/activemq-pool/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/pool/PooledConnectionFactory.java b/activemq-pool/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/pool/PooledConnectionFactory.java
index f6d2ee745f..6bec03e1b1 100644
--- a/activemq-pool/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/pool/PooledConnectionFactory.java
+++ b/activemq-pool/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/pool/PooledConnectionFactory.java
@@ -37,14 +37,21 @@ import org.apache.commons.pool.impl.GenericObjectPoolFactory;
* A JMS provider which pools Connection, Session and MessageProducer instances
* so it can be used with tools like Camel and Spring's JmsTemplate and MessagListenerContainer.
+ * Connections, sessions and producers are returned to a pool after use so that they can be reused later
+ * without having to undergo the cost of creating them again.
*
- * NOTE this implementation does not pool consumers. Pooling makes sense for seldom used
- * resources that are expensive to create and can remain idle a minimal cost. like sessions and producers.
- * Consumers on the other hand, will consume messages even when idle due to prefetch.
- * If you want to consider a consumer pool, configure an appropriate prefetch and a pool
- * allocation strategy that is inclusive. Also note that message order guarantees will be
- * lost across the consumer pool.
+ * b>NOTE: while this implementation does allow the creation of a collection of active consumers,
+ * it does not 'pool' consumers. Pooling makes sense for connections, sessions and producers, which
+ * are expensive to create and can remain idle a minimal cost. Consumers, on the other hand, are usually
+ * just created at startup and left active, handling incoming messages as they come. When a consumer is
+ * complete, it is best to close it rather than return it to a pool for later reuse: this is because,
+ * even if a consumer is idle, ActiveMQ will keep delivering messages to the consumer's prefetch buffer,
+ * where they'll get held until the consumer is active again.
+ *
+ * If you are creating a collection of consumers (for example, for multi-threaded message consumption), you
+ * might want to consider using a lower value for each consumer (e.g. 10 or 20), to ensure that all messages
+ * don't end up going to just one of the consumers. See this FAQ entry for more detail:
+ * http://activemq.apache.org/i-do-not-receive-messages-in-my-second-consumer.html
*
* @org.apache.xbean.XBean element="pooledConnectionFactory"
*