From ddb759d67a33496b482694c4e2de51e9777417d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tompkins <chtompki@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 08:11:56 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] (docs) remove SecureRandom

---
 .../java/org/apache/commons/lang3/RandomStringUtils.java  | 8 +++-----
 src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/RandomUtils.java   | 5 ++---
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/RandomStringUtils.java b/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/RandomStringUtils.java
index 022831203..3380876d7 100644
--- a/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/RandomStringUtils.java
+++ b/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/RandomStringUtils.java
@@ -34,11 +34,9 @@ import java.util.Random;
  * <a href="https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-text/javadocs/api-release/org/apache/commons/text/RandomStringGenerator.html">
  * RandomStringGenerator</a> instead.</p>
  *
- * <p><em>Note.</em> This class relies on an instance {@link Random}, and instances
- * of {@link Random} are not cryptographically
- * secure. Consider instead using {@link SecureRandom}, for which we have no utility class,
- * to get a cryptographically secure pseudo-random number generator for use by
- * security-sensitive applications.</p>
+ * <p><em>Note.</em> This class relies on an instance of {@link Random}, and instances
+ * of {@link Random} are not cryptographically secure. Consider instead using a more
+ * cryptographically secure pseudo-random number generator, for which we have no utility class.
  *
  * <p>#ThreadSafe#</p>
  * @since 1.0
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/RandomUtils.java b/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/RandomUtils.java
index 6a899dcda..6a4100943 100644
--- a/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/RandomUtils.java
+++ b/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/RandomUtils.java
@@ -23,9 +23,8 @@ import java.util.Random;
  * <p>Utility library that supplements the standard {@link Random} class.</p>
  *
  * <p><em>Note.</em> Instances of {@link Random} are not cryptographically
- * secure. Consider instead using {@link SecureRandom}, for which we have no utility class,
- * to get a cryptographically secure pseudo-random number generator for use by
- * security-sensitive applications.</p>
+ * secure. Consider instead using a more cryptographically secure pseudo-random
+ * number generator, for which we have no utility class.</p>
  *
  * @since 3.3
  */