mirror of https://github.com/apache/druid.git
65 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
|
Fixes #XXXX.
|
||
|
|
||
|
(Replace XXXX with the id of the issue fixed in this PR. Remove the above line if there is no corresponding
|
||
|
issue. Don't reference the issue in the title of this pull-request.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
(If you are a committer, follow the PR action item checklist for committers:
|
||
|
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/blob/master/dev/committer-instructions.md#pr-and-issue-action-item-checklist-for-committers.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Description
|
||
|
|
||
|
Describe the goal of this PR, what problem are you fixing. If there is a corresponding issue (referenced above), it's
|
||
|
not necessary to repeat the description here, however, you may choose to keep one summary sentence.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Describe your patch: what did you change in code? How did you fix the problem?
|
||
|
|
||
|
If there are several relatively logically separate changes in this PR, create a mini-section for each of them. For
|
||
|
example:
|
||
|
#### Fixed the bug ...
|
||
|
#### Renamed the class ...
|
||
|
#### Added a forbidden-apis entry ...
|
||
|
|
||
|
In each section, please describe design decisions made, including:
|
||
|
- Choice of algorithms
|
||
|
- Behavioral aspects. What configuration values are acceptable? How are corner cases and error conditions handled, such
|
||
|
as when there are insufficient resources?
|
||
|
- Class organization and design (how the logic is split between classes, inheritance, composition, design patterns)
|
||
|
- Method organization and design (how the logic is split between methods, parameters and return types)
|
||
|
- Naming (class, method, API, configuration, HTTP endpoint, names of emitted metrics)
|
||
|
|
||
|
It's good to describe an alternative design (or mention an alternative name) for every design (or naming) decision point
|
||
|
and compare the alternatives with the designs that you've implemented (or the names you've chosen) to highlight the
|
||
|
advantages of the chosen designs and names.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If there was a discussion of the design of the feature implemented in this PR elsewhere (e. g. a "Proposal" issue, any
|
||
|
other issue, or a thread in the development mailing list), link to that discussion from this PR description and explain
|
||
|
what have changed in your final design compared to your original proposal or the consensus version in the end of the
|
||
|
discussion. If something hasn't changed since the original discussion, you can omit a detailed discussion of those
|
||
|
aspects of the design here, perhaps apart from brief mentioning for the sake of readability of this PR description.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Some of the aspects mentioned above may be omitted for simple and small changes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
<hr>
|
||
|
|
||
|
This PR has:
|
||
|
- [ ] been self-reviewed.
|
||
|
- [ ] using the [concurrency checklist](
|
||
|
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/blob/master/dev/code-review/concurrency.md) (Remove this item if the PR
|
||
|
doesn't have any relation to concurrency.)
|
||
|
- [ ] added documentation for new or modified features or behaviors.
|
||
|
- [ ] added Javadocs for most classes and all non-trivial methods. Linked related entities via Javadoc links.
|
||
|
- [ ] added comments explaining the "why" and the intent of the code wherever would not be obvious for an unfamiliar
|
||
|
reader.
|
||
|
- [ ] added unit tests or modified existing tests to cover new code paths.
|
||
|
- [ ] added integration tests.
|
||
|
- [ ] been tested in a test Druid cluster.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Check the items by putting "x" in the brackets for the done things. Not all of these items apply to every PR. Remove the
|
||
|
items which are not done or not relevant to the PR. None of the items from the checklist above are strictly necessary,
|
||
|
but it would be very helpful if you at least self-review the PR.
|
||
|
|
||
|
<hr>
|
||
|
|
||
|
For reviewers: the key changed/added classes in this PR are `MyFoo`, `OurBar`, and `TheirBaz`.
|
||
|
|
||
|
(Add this section in big PRs to ease navigation in them for reviewers.)
|