Add more exempt tags for stalebot; Make stalebot to close PRs/issues in 28 days rather than in 7/14 days (#8084)

* Add more exempt tags for stalebot; Make stalebot to close PRs/issues in 21 days rather than in 7/14 days

* Exempt labels only for issues, not PRs; Add 'Uncategorized problem report' tag
This commit is contained in:
Roman Leventov 2019-07-18 08:57:42 +03:00 committed by Clint Wylie
parent ceb969903f
commit 2d6d1c17a0
3 changed files with 91 additions and 34 deletions

View File

@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
name: Problem Report
about: A template for Druid problem reports
title: ""
labels: Uncategorized problem report
assignees: ''
---

74
.github/stale.yml vendored
View File

@ -15,12 +15,6 @@
# Configuration for probot-stale - https://github.com/probot/stale
# Issues or Pull Requests with these labels will never be considered stale. Set to `[]` to disable
exemptLabels:
- Security
- Bug
- Proposal
exemptMilestones: true
exemptProjects: true
exemptAssignees: true
@ -31,10 +25,10 @@ staleLabel: stale
# Configuration settings that are specific to just 'issues' or 'pulls':
pulls:
daysUntilStale: 60
daysUntilClose: 7
daysUntilClose: 28
markComment: >
This pull request has been marked as stale due to 60 days of inactivity.
It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think
It will be closed in 4 weeks if no further activity occurs. If you think
that's incorrect or this pull request should instead be reviewed, please simply
write any comment. Even if closed, you can still revive the PR at any time or
discuss it on the dev@druid.apache.org list.
@ -45,12 +39,15 @@ pulls:
This pull request/issue has been closed due to lack of activity. If you think that
is incorrect, or the pull request requires review, you can revive the PR at any time.
# Unlike for issues, there are no exempt labels for PRs, apart from "Evergreen". This is
# to foster PR authors to complete their work.
issues:
daysUntilStale: 280
daysUntilClose: 14
daysUntilClose: 28
markComment: >
This issue has been marked as stale due to 280 days of inactivity.
It will be closed in 2 weeks if no further activity occurs. If this issue is still
It will be closed in 4 weeks if no further activity occurs. If this issue is still
relevant, please simply write any comment. Even if closed, you can still revive the
issue at any time or discuss it on the dev@druid.apache.org list.
Thank you for your contributions.
@ -60,3 +57,60 @@ issues:
This issue has been closed due to lack of activity. If you think that
is incorrect, or the issue requires additional review, you can revive the issue at
any time.
# Issues with these labels will never be considered stale.
# There are almost all labels listed here, except:
# Backport
# Difficulty - *: not used these days, old issues should be revised
# Discuss
# duplicate
# Feature/Change Description
# Feature
# Flaky test: tests tend to become less flaky in time, so these issues should be revised
# invalid
# Priority - *: not used these days, old issues should be revised
# Question
# Release Notes
# Uncategorized problem report: they tend to decline in importance with time
# WIP
# wontfix
exemptLabels:
- Security
- Bug
- Proposal
- Design Review
- Improvement
- Performance
- Refactoring
- Apache
- Area - Automation/Static Analysis
- Area - Batch Indexing
- Area - Cache
- Area - Deep Storage
- Area - Dependencies
- Area - Dependency Injection
- Area - Dev
- Area - Documentation
- Area - Extension
- Area - Kafka/Kinesis Indexing
- Area - Lookups
- Area - Metrics/Event Emitting
- Area - Null Handling
- Area - Operations
- Area - Query UI
- Area - Querying
- Area - Router
- Area - Segment Balancing/Coordination
- Area - Segment Format and Ser/De
- Area - SQL
- Area - Testing
- Area - Web Console
- Area - Zookeeper/Curator
- Compatibility
- Contributions Welcome
- Development Blocker
- Ease of Use
- Error handling
- HTTP
- Incompatible
- Stable API

View File

@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ This document contains various instructions relevant for Druid committers.
This checklist describes steps that every committer should take for their own issues and PRs and when they are the first
committer who visits an issue or a PR authored by a non-committer.
1. Add appropriate tags to the PR, in particular:
1. Add appropriate labels to the PR, in particular:
- [**`Design Review`**](https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/labels/Design%20Review) - for changes that will be
hard to undo after they appear in some Druid release, and/or changes that will have lasting consequences in the
@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ committer who visits an issue or a PR authored by a non-committer.
- Other major changes
PRs that flesh out community standards, checklists, policies, and PRs that change issue and PR templates, in other
words, many of the PRs tagged `Area - Dev` should often be tagged `Design Review` as well.
words, many of the PRs labelled `Area - Dev` should often be labelled `Design Review` as well.
The PR description should succinctly, but completely list all public API elements (`@PublicApi` or
`@ExtensionPoint`), configuration options, emitted metric names, HTTP endpoint paths and parameters that are added
@ -59,18 +59,18 @@ committer who visits an issue or a PR authored by a non-committer.
needed), and the ability to roll back to at least the immediate prior Druid version. If a change makes either one
of these impossible then it should be re-designed.
All `Incompatible` PRs should be tagged `Design Review` too, but not vice versa: some `Design Review` issues,
All `Incompatible` PRs should be labelled `Design Review` too, but not vice versa: some `Design Review` issues,
proposals and PRs may not be `Incompatible`.
- [**`Release Notes`**](https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/labels/Release%20Notes) - for important changes
that should be reflected in the next Druids version release notes. Critically, those are changes that require some
server or query configuration changes made by Druid cluster operators to preserve the former cluster behaviour, i. e.
the majority of PRs tagged `Incompatible`. However, some `Incompatible` PRs may not need to be tagged
the majority of PRs labelled `Incompatible`. However, some `Incompatible` PRs may not need to be labelled
`Release Notes`, e. g. PRs that only change some extension APIs, because when building extensions with the newer
Druid version the incompatibility will be discovered anyway.
Secondarily, PRs that add new features, improve performance or improve Druid cluster operation experience could
also be tagged `Release Notes` at your discretion.
also be labelled `Release Notes` at your discretion.
- [**`Bug`**](https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/labels/Bug) / [**`Security`**](
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/labels/Security) / [**`Feature`**](
@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ committer who visits an issue or a PR authored by a non-committer.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/labels/Performance) / [**`Refactoring`**](
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/labels/Refactoring) / [**`Improvement`**](
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/labels/Improvement) - can be used to distinguish between types of changes.
[**`Compatibility`**](https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/labels/Compatibility) tag also falls into this
[**`Compatibility`**](https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/labels/Compatibility) label also falls into this
category, it's specifically for PRs that restore or improve compatibility with previous Druid versions if it was
inadvertently broken, or for changes that ensure forward compatibility with future Druid versions, forseening specific
changes that would otherwise break the compatibility.
@ -87,11 +87,11 @@ committer who visits an issue or a PR authored by a non-committer.
that need to be merged before some other PRs could even be published. `Development Blocker` PRs should be prioritized
by reviewers, so that they could be merged as soon as possible, thus not blocking somebody's work.
2. If you added some tags on the previous step, describe why did you do that, either in the PR description (if you are
the author of the PR) or in a comment (if you have added tags to a PR submitted by someone else).
2. If you added some labels on the previous step, describe why did you do that, either in the PR description (if you are
the author of the PR) or in a comment (if you have added labels to a PR submitted by someone else).
3. Consider adding one or several **`Area -`** tags to the PR or issue. Consider [creating a new `Area -` tag](
#creating-a-new-tag-on-github) if none of the existing `Area` tags is applicable to the PR or issue.
3. Consider adding one or several **`Area -`** labels to the PR or issue. Consider [creating a new `Area -` label](
#creating-a-new-label-on-github) if none of the existing `Area` labels is applicable to the PR or issue.
- [`Area - Automation/Static Analysis`](
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/labels/Area%20-%20Automation%2FStatic%20Analysis) - for any PRs and issues
@ -102,13 +102,13 @@ the author of the PR) or in a comment (if you have added tags to a PR submitted
- [`Area - Dev`](https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/labels/Area%20-%20Dev) - for PRs and issues related to the
project itself, such as adding developer's docs and checklists, Github issue and PR templates, Github-related issues.
Don't use for PRs and issues related to CI problems: use either `Area - Testing` for problems with Travis or
`Area - Automation/Static Analysis` for problems with TeamCity. PRs with `Area - Dev` tag should usually change files
in `dev/` or `.github/` directories.
`Area - Automation/Static Analysis` for problems with TeamCity. PRs with `Area - Dev` label should usually change
files in `dev/` or `.github/` directories.
- [`Area - Documentation`](https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/labels/Area%20-%20Documentation) - for PRs and
issues about Druid's documentation for users and cluster operators. Don't use for PRs and issues about the
documentation of the Druid's development process itself: use `Area - Dev` for that purpose. Don't use for issues and
PR regarding adding internal design documentation and specification to code, usually, in the form of Javadocs or
comments (there is no specialized tag for this).
comments (there is no specialized label for this).
- [`Area - Lookups`](https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/labels/Area%20-%20Lookups) - for PRs and issues
related to Druid's Query Time Lookups (QTL) feature.
- [`Area - Null Handling`](https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/labels/Area%20-%20Null%20Handling) - for PRs and
@ -124,12 +124,12 @@ the author of the PR) or in a comment (if you have added tags to a PR submitted
- [`Area - Segment Balancing/Coordination`](
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/labels/Area%20-%20Segment%20Balancing%2FCoordination) - for PRs and issue
related to the process of loading and dropping segments in Druid clusters according to specified *rules*, and
balancing segments between Historical nodes in clusters. Coordinator node is responsible for both processes. This tag
is not called "Area - Coordinator" because Coordinator has some other duties that are not covered by this tag, for
example, compacting segments.
balancing segments between Historical nodes in clusters. Coordinator node is responsible for both processes. This
label is not called "Area - Coordinator" because Coordinator has some other duties that are not covered by this
label, for example, compacting segments.
- [`Area - Testing`](https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/labels/Area%20-%20Testing) - use for any PRs and
issues related to testing (including integration testing), Travis CI issues, and flaky tests. For flaky tests, also
add [`Flaky test`](https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/labels/Flaky%20test) tag.
add [`Flaky test`](https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/labels/Flaky%20test) label.
- [`Area - Zookeeper/Curator`](https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/labels/Area%20-%20Zookeeper%2FCurator) - for
any PRs and issues related to ZooKeeper, Curator, and node discovery in Druid.
@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ committed, to avoid cluttering the release manager's workflow.
problems even if you don't plan to review the PR.
6. If you create an issue that is relatively small and self-contained and you don't plan to work on it in the near
future, consider tagging it [**`Contributions Welcome`**](
future, consider labelling it [**`Contributions Welcome`**](
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/labels/Contributions%20Welcome) so that other people know that the issue is
free to pick up and is relatively easily doable even for those who are not very familiar with the codebase.
@ -159,17 +159,19 @@ number (such as 0.10.1, while the previous release is 0.10 or 0.10.0), rename th
4. Consider thanking the author for contribution, especially a new contributor.
## Creating a new tag on Github
## Creating a new label on Github
After creating a tag for your PR or issue, don't forget to take the following steps:
After creating a new label for your PR or issue, don't forget to take the following steps:
1. Search existing PRs and issues and try to add the new tag to at least three of them.
1. Search existing PRs and issues and try to add the new label to at least three of them.
2. Describe the new tag in the [PR and issue action item checklist for committers](
2. Describe the new label in the [PR and issue action item checklist for committers](
#pr-and-issue-action-item-checklist-for-committers) above.
3. Although it is *not* necessary to preliminarily discuss creation of a new tag in the developers' mailing list, please
announce the new tag after you've created it at `dev@druid.apache.org`.
3. Add the label to stalebot's excemptions if needed: see [`stale.yml`](../.github/stale.yml).
4. Although it is *not* necessary to preliminarily discuss creation of a new label in the developers' mailing list,
please announce the new label after you've created it at `dev@druid.apache.org`.
## Become an Administrator of the Druid project in TeamCity