* Merge core CoordinatorClient with MSQ CoordinatorServiceClient.
Continuing the work from #12696, this patch merges the MSQ
CoordinatorServiceClient into the core CoordinatorClient, yielding a single
interface that serves both needs and is based on the ServiceClient RPC
system rather than DruidLeaderClient.
Also removes the backwards-compatibility code for the handoff API in
CoordinatorBasedSegmentHandoffNotifier, because the new API was added
in 0.14.0. That's long enough ago that we don't need backwards
compatibility for rolling updates.
* Fixups.
* Trigger GHA.
* Remove unnecessary retrying in DruidInputSource. Add "about an hour"
retry policy and h
* EasyMock
* SQL OperatorConversions: Introduce.aggregatorBuilder, allow CAST-as-literal.
Four main changes:
1) Provide aggregatorBuilder, a more consistent way of defining the
SqlAggFunction we need for all of our SQL aggregators. The mechanism
is analogous to the one we already use for SQL functions
(OperatorConversions.operatorBuilder).
2) Allow CASTs of constants to be considered as "literalOperands". This
fixes an issue where various of our operators are defined with
OperandTypes.LITERAL as part of their checkers, which doesn't allow
casts. However, in these cases we generally _do_ want to allow casts.
The important piece is that the value must be reducible to a constant,
not that the SQL text is literally a literal.
3) Update DataSketches SQL aggregators to use the new aggregatorBuilder
functionality. The main user-visible effect here is [2]: the aggregators
would now accept, for example, "CAST(0.99 AS DOUBLE)" as a literal
argument. Other aggregators could be updated in a future patch.
4) Rename "requiredOperands" to "requiredOperandCount", because the
old name was confusing. (It rhymes with "literalOperands" but the
arguments mean different things.)
* Adjust method calls.
* merge druid-core, extendedset, and druid-hll into druid-processing to simplify everything
* fix poms and license stuff
* mockito is evil
* allow reset of JvmUtils RuntimeInfo if tests used static injection to override
We introduce two new configuration keys that refine the query context security model controlled by druid.auth.authorizeQueryContextParams. When that value is set to true then two other configuration options become available:
druid.auth.unsecuredContextKeys: The set of query context keys that do not require a security check. Use this for the "white-list" of key to allow. All other keys go through the existing context key security checks.
druid.auth.securedContextKeys: The set of query context keys that do require a security check. Use this when you want to allow all but a specific set of keys: only these keys go through the existing context key security checks.
Both are set using JSON list format:
druid.auth.securedContextKeys=["secretKey1", "secretKey2"]
You generally set one or the other values. If both are set, unsecuredContextKeys acts as exceptions to securedContextKeys.
In addition, Druid defines two query context keys which always bypass checks because Druid uses them internally:
sqlQueryId
sqlStringifyArrays
* more consistent expression error messages
* review stuff
* add NamedFunction for Function, ApplyFunction, and ExprMacro to share common stuff
* fixes
* add expression transform name to transformer failure, better parse_json error messaging
This commit is a first draft of the revised integration test framework which provides:
- A new directory, integration-tests-ex that holds the new integration test structure. (For now, the existing integration-tests is left unchanged.)
- Maven module druid-it-tools to hold code placed into the Docker image.
- Maven module druid-it-image to build the Druid-only test image from the tarball produced in distribution. (Dependencies live in their "official" image.)
- Maven module druid-it-cases that holds the revised tests and the framework itself. The framework includes file-based test configuration, test-specific clients, test initialization and updated versions of some of the common test support classes.
The integration test setup is primarily a huge mass of details. This approach refactors many of those details: from how the image is built and configured to how the Docker Compose scripts are structured to test configuration. An extensive set of "readme" files explains those details. Rather than repeat that material here, please consult those files for explanations.
Laksh Singla
Gian Merlino
AmatyaAvadhanula
Clint Wylie
Kashif Faraz
Paul Rogers
Abhishek Agarwal