HDFS-9083. Replication violates block placement policy. Contributed by Rushabh Shah.
This commit is contained in:
parent
336be63dad
commit
13b256ed22
|
@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ Release 2.7.2 - UNRELEASED
|
|||
HDFS-9043. Doc updation for commands in HDFS Federation
|
||||
(J.Andreina via vinayakumab)
|
||||
|
||||
HDFS-9083. Replication violates block placement policy (Rushabh Shah)
|
||||
|
||||
HDFS-9106. Transfer failure during pipeline recovery causes permanent
|
||||
write failures (kihwal)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -224,9 +224,6 @@ public class BlockManager {
|
|||
|
||||
final float blocksInvalidateWorkPct;
|
||||
final int blocksReplWorkMultiplier;
|
||||
|
||||
/** variable to enable check for enough racks */
|
||||
final boolean shouldCheckForEnoughRacks;
|
||||
|
||||
// whether or not to issue block encryption keys.
|
||||
final boolean encryptDataTransfer;
|
||||
|
@ -325,9 +322,6 @@ public class BlockManager {
|
|||
conf.getInt(
|
||||
DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_REPLICATION_STREAMS_HARD_LIMIT_KEY,
|
||||
DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_REPLICATION_STREAMS_HARD_LIMIT_DEFAULT);
|
||||
this.shouldCheckForEnoughRacks =
|
||||
conf.get(DFSConfigKeys.NET_TOPOLOGY_SCRIPT_FILE_NAME_KEY) == null
|
||||
? false : true;
|
||||
|
||||
this.blocksInvalidateWorkPct = DFSUtil.getInvalidateWorkPctPerIteration(conf);
|
||||
this.blocksReplWorkMultiplier = DFSUtil.getReplWorkMultiplier(conf);
|
||||
|
@ -351,7 +345,6 @@ public class BlockManager {
|
|||
LOG.info("maxReplication = " + maxReplication);
|
||||
LOG.info("minReplication = " + minReplication);
|
||||
LOG.info("maxReplicationStreams = " + maxReplicationStreams);
|
||||
LOG.info("shouldCheckForEnoughRacks = " + shouldCheckForEnoughRacks);
|
||||
LOG.info("replicationRecheckInterval = " + replicationRecheckInterval);
|
||||
LOG.info("encryptDataTransfer = " + encryptDataTransfer);
|
||||
LOG.info("maxNumBlocksToLog = " + maxNumBlocksToLog);
|
||||
|
@ -3490,9 +3483,6 @@ public class BlockManager {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
boolean blockHasEnoughRacks(Block b) {
|
||||
if (!this.shouldCheckForEnoughRacks) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
boolean enoughRacks = false;;
|
||||
Collection<DatanodeDescriptor> corruptNodes =
|
||||
corruptReplicas.getNodes(b);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -816,4 +816,28 @@ public class TestBlockManager {
|
|||
Assert.assertFalse(BlockManager.useDelHint(true, delHint, null,
|
||||
moreThan1Racks, excessTypes));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* {@link BlockManager#blockHasEnoughRacks(BlockInfo)} should return false
|
||||
* if all the replicas are on the same rack and shouldn't be dependent on
|
||||
* CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.NET_TOPOLOGY_SCRIPT_FILE_NAME_KEY
|
||||
* @throws Exception
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testAllReplicasOnSameRack() throws Exception {
|
||||
Configuration conf = new HdfsConfiguration();
|
||||
conf.unset(DFSConfigKeys.NET_TOPOLOGY_SCRIPT_FILE_NAME_KEY);
|
||||
fsn = Mockito.mock(FSNamesystem.class);
|
||||
Mockito.doReturn(true).when(fsn).hasWriteLock();
|
||||
Mockito.doReturn(true).when(fsn).hasReadLock();
|
||||
bm = new BlockManager(fsn, conf);
|
||||
// Add nodes on two racks
|
||||
addNodes(nodes);
|
||||
// Added a new block in blocksMap and all the replicas are on the same rack
|
||||
BlockInfoContiguous blockInfo = addBlockOnNodes(1, rackA);
|
||||
// Since the network toppolgy is multi-rack, the blockHasEnoughRacks
|
||||
// should return false.
|
||||
assertFalse("Replicas for block is not stored on enough racks",
|
||||
bm.blockHasEnoughRacks(blockInfo));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue