YARN-3434. Interaction between reservations and userlimit can result in significant ULF violation
This commit is contained in:
parent
baf8bc6c48
commit
189a63a719
|
@ -252,6 +252,9 @@ Release 2.8.0 - UNRELEASED
|
|||
YARN-3495. Confusing log generated by FairScheduler.
|
||||
(Brahma Reddy Battula via ozawa)
|
||||
|
||||
YARN-3434. Interaction between reservations and userlimit can result in
|
||||
significant ULF violation (tgraves)
|
||||
|
||||
Release 2.7.1 - UNRELEASED
|
||||
|
||||
INCOMPATIBLE CHANGES
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -19,22 +19,44 @@
|
|||
package org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler;
|
||||
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.api.records.Resource;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.util.resource.Resources;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Resource limits for queues/applications, this means max overall (please note
|
||||
* that, it's not "extra") resource you can get.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public class ResourceLimits {
|
||||
volatile Resource limit;
|
||||
|
||||
// This is special limit that goes with the RESERVE_CONT_LOOK_ALL_NODES
|
||||
// config. This limit indicates how much we need to unreserve to allocate
|
||||
// another container.
|
||||
private volatile Resource amountNeededUnreserve;
|
||||
|
||||
public ResourceLimits(Resource limit) {
|
||||
this.amountNeededUnreserve = Resources.none();
|
||||
this.limit = limit;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public ResourceLimits(Resource limit, Resource amountNeededUnreserve) {
|
||||
this.amountNeededUnreserve = amountNeededUnreserve;
|
||||
this.limit = limit;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
volatile Resource limit;
|
||||
public Resource getLimit() {
|
||||
return limit;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public Resource getAmountNeededUnreserve() {
|
||||
return amountNeededUnreserve;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void setLimit(Resource limit) {
|
||||
this.limit = limit;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void setAmountNeededUnreserve(Resource amountNeededUnreserve) {
|
||||
this.amountNeededUnreserve = amountNeededUnreserve;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -473,6 +473,9 @@ public abstract class AbstractCSQueue implements CSQueue {
|
|||
getCurrentLimitResource(nodePartition, clusterResource,
|
||||
currentResourceLimits, schedulingMode);
|
||||
|
||||
if (Resources.greaterThan(resourceCalculator, clusterResource,
|
||||
newTotalResource, currentLimitResource)) {
|
||||
|
||||
// if reservation continous looking enabled, check to see if could we
|
||||
// potentially use this node instead of a reserved node if the application
|
||||
// has reserved containers.
|
||||
|
@ -498,16 +501,11 @@ public abstract class AbstractCSQueue implements CSQueue {
|
|||
+ newTotalWithoutReservedResource + ", maxLimitCapacity: "
|
||||
+ currentLimitResource);
|
||||
}
|
||||
currentResourceLimits.setAmountNeededUnreserve(Resources.subtract(newTotalResource,
|
||||
currentLimitResource));
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check if we over current-resource-limit computed.
|
||||
if (Resources.greaterThan(resourceCalculator, clusterResource,
|
||||
newTotalResource, currentLimitResource)) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
|
||||
LOG.debug(getQueueName()
|
||||
+ "Check assign to queue, nodePartition="
|
||||
|
@ -523,6 +521,8 @@ public abstract class AbstractCSQueue implements CSQueue {
|
|||
+ " max-capacity: "
|
||||
+ queueCapacities.getAbsoluteMaximumCapacity(nodePartition) + ")");
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
private final QueueResourceLimitsInfo queueResourceLimitsInfo =
|
||||
new QueueResourceLimitsInfo();
|
||||
|
||||
private volatile ResourceLimits currentResourceLimits = null;
|
||||
private volatile ResourceLimits cachedResourceLimitsForHeadroom = null;
|
||||
|
||||
private OrderingPolicy<FiCaSchedulerApp>
|
||||
orderingPolicy = new FifoOrderingPolicy<FiCaSchedulerApp>();
|
||||
|
@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
this.lastClusterResource = clusterResource;
|
||||
updateAbsoluteCapacityResource(clusterResource);
|
||||
|
||||
this.currentResourceLimits = new ResourceLimits(clusterResource);
|
||||
this.cachedResourceLimitsForHeadroom = new ResourceLimits(clusterResource);
|
||||
|
||||
// Initialize headroom info, also used for calculating application
|
||||
// master resource limits. Since this happens during queue initialization
|
||||
|
@ -858,14 +858,14 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
|
||||
// Check queue max-capacity limit
|
||||
if (!super.canAssignToThisQueue(clusterResource, node.getPartition(),
|
||||
this.currentResourceLimits, required,
|
||||
currentResourceLimits, required,
|
||||
application.getCurrentReservation(), schedulingMode)) {
|
||||
return NULL_ASSIGNMENT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check user limit
|
||||
if (!canAssignToUser(clusterResource, application.getUser(), userLimit,
|
||||
application, true, node.getPartition())) {
|
||||
application, node.getPartition(), currentResourceLimits)) {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -908,7 +908,7 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
// Try to schedule
|
||||
CSAssignment assignment =
|
||||
assignContainersOnNode(clusterResource, node, application, priority,
|
||||
null, schedulingMode);
|
||||
null, schedulingMode, currentResourceLimits);
|
||||
|
||||
// Did the application skip this node?
|
||||
if (assignment.getSkipped()) {
|
||||
|
@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
// Try to assign if we have sufficient resources
|
||||
CSAssignment tmp =
|
||||
assignContainersOnNode(clusterResource, node, application, priority,
|
||||
rmContainer, schedulingMode);
|
||||
rmContainer, schedulingMode, new ResourceLimits(Resources.none()));
|
||||
|
||||
// Doesn't matter... since it's already charged for at time of reservation
|
||||
// "re-reservation" is *free*
|
||||
|
@ -1026,7 +1026,7 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
private void setQueueResourceLimitsInfo(
|
||||
Resource clusterResource) {
|
||||
synchronized (queueResourceLimitsInfo) {
|
||||
queueResourceLimitsInfo.setQueueCurrentLimit(currentResourceLimits
|
||||
queueResourceLimitsInfo.setQueueCurrentLimit(cachedResourceLimitsForHeadroom
|
||||
.getLimit());
|
||||
queueResourceLimitsInfo.setClusterResource(clusterResource);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1048,13 +1048,13 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
setQueueResourceLimitsInfo(clusterResource);
|
||||
|
||||
Resource headroom =
|
||||
getHeadroom(queueUser, currentResourceLimits.getLimit(),
|
||||
getHeadroom(queueUser, cachedResourceLimitsForHeadroom.getLimit(),
|
||||
clusterResource, userLimit);
|
||||
|
||||
if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
|
||||
LOG.debug("Headroom calculation for user " + user + ": " +
|
||||
" userLimit=" + userLimit +
|
||||
" queueMaxAvailRes=" + currentResourceLimits.getLimit() +
|
||||
" queueMaxAvailRes=" + cachedResourceLimitsForHeadroom.getLimit() +
|
||||
" consumed=" + queueUser.getUsed() +
|
||||
" headroom=" + headroom);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1169,7 +1169,7 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
@Private
|
||||
protected synchronized boolean canAssignToUser(Resource clusterResource,
|
||||
String userName, Resource limit, FiCaSchedulerApp application,
|
||||
boolean checkReservations, String nodePartition) {
|
||||
String nodePartition, ResourceLimits currentResoureLimits) {
|
||||
User user = getUser(userName);
|
||||
|
||||
// Note: We aren't considering the current request since there is a fixed
|
||||
|
@ -1180,13 +1180,13 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
limit)) {
|
||||
// if enabled, check to see if could we potentially use this node instead
|
||||
// of a reserved node if the application has reserved containers
|
||||
if (this.reservationsContinueLooking && checkReservations
|
||||
&& nodePartition.equals(CommonNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL)) {
|
||||
if (this.reservationsContinueLooking &&
|
||||
nodePartition.equals(CommonNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL)) {
|
||||
if (Resources.lessThanOrEqual(
|
||||
resourceCalculator,
|
||||
clusterResource,
|
||||
Resources.subtract(user.getUsed(),
|
||||
application.getCurrentReservation()), limit)) {
|
||||
Resources.subtract(user.getUsed(),application.getCurrentReservation()),
|
||||
limit)) {
|
||||
|
||||
if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
|
||||
LOG.debug("User " + userName + " in queue " + getQueueName()
|
||||
|
@ -1194,6 +1194,13 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
+ user.getUsed() + " reserved: "
|
||||
+ application.getCurrentReservation() + " limit: " + limit);
|
||||
}
|
||||
Resource amountNeededToUnreserve = Resources.subtract(user.getUsed(nodePartition), limit);
|
||||
// we can only acquire a new container if we unreserve first since we ignored the
|
||||
// user limit. Choose the max of user limit or what was previously set by max
|
||||
// capacity.
|
||||
currentResoureLimits.setAmountNeededUnreserve(
|
||||
Resources.max(resourceCalculator, clusterResource,
|
||||
currentResoureLimits.getAmountNeededUnreserve(), amountNeededToUnreserve));
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1240,7 +1247,8 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
|
||||
private CSAssignment assignContainersOnNode(Resource clusterResource,
|
||||
FiCaSchedulerNode node, FiCaSchedulerApp application, Priority priority,
|
||||
RMContainer reservedContainer, SchedulingMode schedulingMode) {
|
||||
RMContainer reservedContainer, SchedulingMode schedulingMode,
|
||||
ResourceLimits currentResoureLimits) {
|
||||
|
||||
CSAssignment assigned;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1254,7 +1262,7 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
assigned =
|
||||
assignNodeLocalContainers(clusterResource, nodeLocalResourceRequest,
|
||||
node, application, priority, reservedContainer,
|
||||
allocatedContainer, schedulingMode);
|
||||
allocatedContainer, schedulingMode, currentResoureLimits);
|
||||
if (Resources.greaterThan(resourceCalculator, clusterResource,
|
||||
assigned.getResource(), Resources.none())) {
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1283,7 +1291,7 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
assigned =
|
||||
assignRackLocalContainers(clusterResource, rackLocalResourceRequest,
|
||||
node, application, priority, reservedContainer,
|
||||
allocatedContainer, schedulingMode);
|
||||
allocatedContainer, schedulingMode, currentResoureLimits);
|
||||
if (Resources.greaterThan(resourceCalculator, clusterResource,
|
||||
assigned.getResource(), Resources.none())) {
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1312,7 +1320,7 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
assigned =
|
||||
assignOffSwitchContainers(clusterResource, offSwitchResourceRequest,
|
||||
node, application, priority, reservedContainer,
|
||||
allocatedContainer, schedulingMode);
|
||||
allocatedContainer, schedulingMode, currentResoureLimits);
|
||||
|
||||
// update locality statistics
|
||||
if (allocatedContainer.getValue() != null) {
|
||||
|
@ -1325,18 +1333,10 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
return SKIP_ASSIGNMENT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private Resource getMinimumResourceNeedUnreserved(Resource askedResource) {
|
||||
// First we need to get minimum resource we need unreserve
|
||||
// minimum-resource-need-unreserve = used + asked - limit
|
||||
return Resources.subtract(
|
||||
Resources.add(queueUsage.getUsed(), askedResource),
|
||||
currentResourceLimits.getLimit());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Private
|
||||
protected boolean findNodeToUnreserve(Resource clusterResource,
|
||||
FiCaSchedulerNode node, FiCaSchedulerApp application, Priority priority,
|
||||
Resource askedResource, Resource minimumUnreservedResource) {
|
||||
Resource minimumUnreservedResource) {
|
||||
// need to unreserve some other container first
|
||||
NodeId idToUnreserve =
|
||||
application.getNodeIdToUnreserve(priority, minimumUnreservedResource,
|
||||
|
@ -1357,7 +1357,7 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
LOG.debug("unreserving for app: " + application.getApplicationId()
|
||||
+ " on nodeId: " + idToUnreserve
|
||||
+ " in order to replace reserved application and place it on node: "
|
||||
+ node.getNodeID() + " needing: " + askedResource);
|
||||
+ node.getNodeID() + " needing: " + minimumUnreservedResource);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// headroom
|
||||
|
@ -1376,47 +1376,16 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Private
|
||||
protected boolean checkLimitsToReserve(Resource clusterResource,
|
||||
FiCaSchedulerApp application, Resource capability, String nodePartition,
|
||||
SchedulingMode schedulingMode) {
|
||||
// we can't reserve if we got here based on the limit
|
||||
// checks assuming we could unreserve!!!
|
||||
Resource userLimit = computeUserLimitAndSetHeadroom(application,
|
||||
clusterResource, capability, nodePartition, schedulingMode);
|
||||
|
||||
// Check queue max-capacity limit,
|
||||
// TODO: Consider reservation on labels
|
||||
if (!canAssignToThisQueue(clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL,
|
||||
this.currentResourceLimits, capability, Resources.none(), schedulingMode)) {
|
||||
if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
|
||||
LOG.debug("was going to reserve but hit queue limit");
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check user limit
|
||||
if (!canAssignToUser(clusterResource, application.getUser(), userLimit,
|
||||
application, false, nodePartition)) {
|
||||
if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
|
||||
LOG.debug("was going to reserve but hit user limit");
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
private CSAssignment assignNodeLocalContainers(Resource clusterResource,
|
||||
ResourceRequest nodeLocalResourceRequest, FiCaSchedulerNode node,
|
||||
FiCaSchedulerApp application, Priority priority,
|
||||
RMContainer reservedContainer, MutableObject allocatedContainer,
|
||||
SchedulingMode schedulingMode) {
|
||||
SchedulingMode schedulingMode, ResourceLimits currentResoureLimits) {
|
||||
if (canAssign(application, priority, node, NodeType.NODE_LOCAL,
|
||||
reservedContainer)) {
|
||||
return assignContainer(clusterResource, node, application, priority,
|
||||
nodeLocalResourceRequest, NodeType.NODE_LOCAL, reservedContainer,
|
||||
allocatedContainer, schedulingMode);
|
||||
allocatedContainer, schedulingMode, currentResoureLimits);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return new CSAssignment(Resources.none(), NodeType.NODE_LOCAL);
|
||||
|
@ -1426,12 +1395,12 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
ResourceRequest rackLocalResourceRequest, FiCaSchedulerNode node,
|
||||
FiCaSchedulerApp application, Priority priority,
|
||||
RMContainer reservedContainer, MutableObject allocatedContainer,
|
||||
SchedulingMode schedulingMode) {
|
||||
SchedulingMode schedulingMode, ResourceLimits currentResoureLimits) {
|
||||
if (canAssign(application, priority, node, NodeType.RACK_LOCAL,
|
||||
reservedContainer)) {
|
||||
return assignContainer(clusterResource, node, application, priority,
|
||||
rackLocalResourceRequest, NodeType.RACK_LOCAL, reservedContainer,
|
||||
allocatedContainer, schedulingMode);
|
||||
allocatedContainer, schedulingMode, currentResoureLimits);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return new CSAssignment(Resources.none(), NodeType.RACK_LOCAL);
|
||||
|
@ -1441,12 +1410,12 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
ResourceRequest offSwitchResourceRequest, FiCaSchedulerNode node,
|
||||
FiCaSchedulerApp application, Priority priority,
|
||||
RMContainer reservedContainer, MutableObject allocatedContainer,
|
||||
SchedulingMode schedulingMode) {
|
||||
SchedulingMode schedulingMode, ResourceLimits currentResoureLimits) {
|
||||
if (canAssign(application, priority, node, NodeType.OFF_SWITCH,
|
||||
reservedContainer)) {
|
||||
return assignContainer(clusterResource, node, application, priority,
|
||||
offSwitchResourceRequest, NodeType.OFF_SWITCH, reservedContainer,
|
||||
allocatedContainer, schedulingMode);
|
||||
allocatedContainer, schedulingMode, currentResoureLimits);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return new CSAssignment(Resources.none(), NodeType.OFF_SWITCH);
|
||||
|
@ -1529,7 +1498,8 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
private CSAssignment assignContainer(Resource clusterResource, FiCaSchedulerNode node,
|
||||
FiCaSchedulerApp application, Priority priority,
|
||||
ResourceRequest request, NodeType type, RMContainer rmContainer,
|
||||
MutableObject createdContainer, SchedulingMode schedulingMode) {
|
||||
MutableObject createdContainer, SchedulingMode schedulingMode,
|
||||
ResourceLimits currentResoureLimits) {
|
||||
if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
|
||||
LOG.debug("assignContainers: node=" + node.getNodeName()
|
||||
+ " application=" + application.getApplicationId()
|
||||
|
@ -1580,6 +1550,10 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
// Can we allocate a container on this node?
|
||||
int availableContainers =
|
||||
resourceCalculator.computeAvailableContainers(available, capability);
|
||||
|
||||
boolean needToUnreserve = Resources.greaterThan(resourceCalculator,clusterResource,
|
||||
currentResoureLimits.getAmountNeededUnreserve(), Resources.none());
|
||||
|
||||
if (availableContainers > 0) {
|
||||
// Allocate...
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1588,20 +1562,24 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
unreserve(application, priority, node, rmContainer);
|
||||
} else if (this.reservationsContinueLooking && node.getLabels().isEmpty()) {
|
||||
// when reservationsContinueLooking is set, we may need to unreserve
|
||||
// some containers to meet this queue and its parents' resource limits
|
||||
// some containers to meet this queue, its parents', or the users' resource limits.
|
||||
// TODO, need change here when we want to support continuous reservation
|
||||
// looking for labeled partitions.
|
||||
Resource minimumUnreservedResource =
|
||||
getMinimumResourceNeedUnreserved(capability);
|
||||
if (!shouldAllocOrReserveNewContainer
|
||||
|| Resources.greaterThan(resourceCalculator, clusterResource,
|
||||
minimumUnreservedResource, Resources.none())) {
|
||||
if (!shouldAllocOrReserveNewContainer || needToUnreserve) {
|
||||
// If we shouldn't allocate/reserve new container then we should unreserve one the same
|
||||
// size we are asking for since the currentResoureLimits.getAmountNeededUnreserve
|
||||
// could be zero. If the limit was hit then use the amount we need to unreserve to be
|
||||
// under the limit.
|
||||
Resource amountToUnreserve = capability;
|
||||
if (needToUnreserve) {
|
||||
amountToUnreserve = currentResoureLimits.getAmountNeededUnreserve();
|
||||
}
|
||||
boolean containerUnreserved =
|
||||
findNodeToUnreserve(clusterResource, node, application, priority,
|
||||
capability, minimumUnreservedResource);
|
||||
amountToUnreserve);
|
||||
// When (minimum-unreserved-resource > 0 OR we cannot allocate new/reserved
|
||||
// container (That means we *have to* unreserve some resource to
|
||||
// continue)). If we failed to unreserve some resource,
|
||||
// continue)). If we failed to unreserve some resource, we can't continue.
|
||||
if (!containerUnreserved) {
|
||||
return new CSAssignment(Resources.none(), type);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1642,13 +1620,13 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
if (shouldAllocOrReserveNewContainer || rmContainer != null) {
|
||||
|
||||
if (reservationsContinueLooking && rmContainer == null) {
|
||||
// we could possibly ignoring parent queue capacity limits when
|
||||
// reservationsContinueLooking is set.
|
||||
// If we're trying to reserve a container here, not container will be
|
||||
// unreserved for reserving the new one. Check limits again before
|
||||
// reserve the new container
|
||||
if (!checkLimitsToReserve(clusterResource,
|
||||
application, capability, node.getPartition(), schedulingMode)) {
|
||||
// we could possibly ignoring queue capacity or user limits when
|
||||
// reservationsContinueLooking is set. Make sure we didn't need to unreserve
|
||||
// one.
|
||||
if (needToUnreserve) {
|
||||
if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
|
||||
LOG.debug("we needed to unreserve to be able to allocate");
|
||||
}
|
||||
return new CSAssignment(Resources.none(), type);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1811,14 +1789,14 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
// Even if ParentQueue will set limits respect child's max queue capacity,
|
||||
// but when allocating reserved container, CapacityScheduler doesn't do
|
||||
// this. So need cap limits by queue's max capacity here.
|
||||
this.currentResourceLimits = currentResourceLimits;
|
||||
this.cachedResourceLimitsForHeadroom = new ResourceLimits(currentResourceLimits.getLimit());
|
||||
Resource queueMaxResource =
|
||||
Resources.multiplyAndNormalizeDown(resourceCalculator, labelManager
|
||||
.getResourceByLabel(RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, clusterResource),
|
||||
queueCapacities
|
||||
.getAbsoluteMaximumCapacity(RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL),
|
||||
minimumAllocation);
|
||||
this.currentResourceLimits.setLimit(Resources.min(resourceCalculator,
|
||||
this.cachedResourceLimitsForHeadroom.setLimit(Resources.min(resourceCalculator,
|
||||
clusterResource, queueMaxResource, currentResourceLimits.getLimit()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -748,14 +748,14 @@ public class TestReservations {
|
|||
|
||||
// nothing reserved
|
||||
boolean res = a.findNodeToUnreserve(csContext.getClusterResource(),
|
||||
node_1, app_0, priorityMap, capability, capability);
|
||||
node_1, app_0, priorityMap, capability);
|
||||
assertFalse(res);
|
||||
|
||||
// reserved but scheduler doesn't know about that node.
|
||||
app_0.reserve(node_1, priorityMap, rmContainer, container);
|
||||
node_1.reserveResource(app_0, priorityMap, rmContainer);
|
||||
res = a.findNodeToUnreserve(csContext.getClusterResource(), node_1, app_0,
|
||||
priorityMap, capability, capability);
|
||||
priorityMap, capability);
|
||||
assertFalse(res);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -858,12 +858,13 @@ public class TestReservations {
|
|||
// allocate to queue so that the potential new capacity is greater then
|
||||
// absoluteMaxCapacity
|
||||
Resource capability = Resources.createResource(32 * GB, 0);
|
||||
ResourceLimits limits = new ResourceLimits(clusterResource);
|
||||
boolean res =
|
||||
a.canAssignToThisQueue(clusterResource,
|
||||
RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, new ResourceLimits(
|
||||
clusterResource), capability, Resources.none(),
|
||||
RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, limits, capability, Resources.none(),
|
||||
SchedulingMode.RESPECT_PARTITION_EXCLUSIVITY);
|
||||
assertFalse(res);
|
||||
assertEquals(limits.getAmountNeededUnreserve(), Resources.none());
|
||||
|
||||
// now add in reservations and make sure it continues if config set
|
||||
// allocate to queue so that the potential new capacity is greater then
|
||||
|
@ -880,38 +881,43 @@ public class TestReservations {
|
|||
assertEquals(3 * GB, node_1.getUsedResource().getMemory());
|
||||
|
||||
capability = Resources.createResource(5 * GB, 0);
|
||||
limits = new ResourceLimits(clusterResource);
|
||||
res =
|
||||
a.canAssignToThisQueue(clusterResource,
|
||||
RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, new ResourceLimits(
|
||||
clusterResource), capability, Resources.createResource(5 * GB),
|
||||
RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, limits, capability, Resources.createResource(5 * GB),
|
||||
SchedulingMode.RESPECT_PARTITION_EXCLUSIVITY);
|
||||
assertTrue(res);
|
||||
// 16GB total, 13GB consumed (8 allocated, 5 reserved). asking for 5GB so we would have to
|
||||
// unreserve 2GB to get the total 5GB needed.
|
||||
// also note vcore checks not enabled
|
||||
assertEquals(Resources.createResource(2 * GB, 3), limits.getAmountNeededUnreserve());
|
||||
|
||||
// tell to not check reservations
|
||||
limits = new ResourceLimits(clusterResource);
|
||||
res =
|
||||
a.canAssignToThisQueue(clusterResource,
|
||||
RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, new ResourceLimits(
|
||||
clusterResource), capability, Resources.none(),
|
||||
RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL,limits, capability, Resources.none(),
|
||||
SchedulingMode.RESPECT_PARTITION_EXCLUSIVITY);
|
||||
assertFalse(res);
|
||||
assertEquals(Resources.none(), limits.getAmountNeededUnreserve());
|
||||
|
||||
refreshQueuesTurnOffReservationsContLook(a, csConf);
|
||||
|
||||
// should return false no matter what checkReservations is passed
|
||||
// in since feature is off
|
||||
// should return false since reservations continue look is off.
|
||||
limits = new ResourceLimits(clusterResource);
|
||||
res =
|
||||
a.canAssignToThisQueue(clusterResource,
|
||||
RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, new ResourceLimits(
|
||||
clusterResource), capability, Resources.none(),
|
||||
RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, limits, capability, Resources.none(),
|
||||
SchedulingMode.RESPECT_PARTITION_EXCLUSIVITY);
|
||||
assertFalse(res);
|
||||
|
||||
assertEquals(limits.getAmountNeededUnreserve(), Resources.none());
|
||||
limits = new ResourceLimits(clusterResource);
|
||||
res =
|
||||
a.canAssignToThisQueue(clusterResource,
|
||||
RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, new ResourceLimits(
|
||||
clusterResource), capability, Resources.createResource(5 * GB),
|
||||
RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, limits, capability, Resources.createResource(5 * GB),
|
||||
SchedulingMode.RESPECT_PARTITION_EXCLUSIVITY);
|
||||
assertFalse(res);
|
||||
assertEquals(Resources.none(), limits.getAmountNeededUnreserve());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void refreshQueuesTurnOffReservationsContLook(LeafQueue a,
|
||||
|
@ -1059,22 +1065,33 @@ public class TestReservations {
|
|||
assertEquals(5 * GB, node_0.getUsedResource().getMemory());
|
||||
assertEquals(3 * GB, node_1.getUsedResource().getMemory());
|
||||
|
||||
// set limit so subtrace reservations it can continue
|
||||
Resource limit = Resources.createResource(12 * GB, 0);
|
||||
boolean res = a.canAssignToUser(clusterResource, user_0, limit, app_0,
|
||||
true, "");
|
||||
// not over the limit
|
||||
Resource limit = Resources.createResource(14 * GB, 0);
|
||||
ResourceLimits userResourceLimits = new ResourceLimits(clusterResource);
|
||||
boolean res = a.canAssignToUser(clusterResource, user_0, limit, app_0, "", userResourceLimits);
|
||||
assertTrue(res);
|
||||
assertEquals(Resources.none(), userResourceLimits.getAmountNeededUnreserve());
|
||||
|
||||
// tell it not to check for reservations and should fail as already over
|
||||
// limit
|
||||
res = a.canAssignToUser(clusterResource, user_0, limit, app_0, false, "");
|
||||
assertFalse(res);
|
||||
|
||||
// set limit so it subtracts reservations and it can continue
|
||||
limit = Resources.createResource(12 * GB, 0);
|
||||
userResourceLimits = new ResourceLimits(clusterResource);
|
||||
res = a.canAssignToUser(clusterResource, user_0, limit, app_0,
|
||||
"", userResourceLimits);
|
||||
assertTrue(res);
|
||||
// limit set to 12GB, we are using 13GB (8 allocated, 5 reserved), to get under limit
|
||||
// we need to unreserve 1GB
|
||||
// also note vcore checks not enabled
|
||||
assertEquals(Resources.createResource(1 * GB, 4),
|
||||
userResourceLimits.getAmountNeededUnreserve());
|
||||
|
||||
refreshQueuesTurnOffReservationsContLook(a, csConf);
|
||||
userResourceLimits = new ResourceLimits(clusterResource);
|
||||
|
||||
// should now return false since feature off
|
||||
res = a.canAssignToUser(clusterResource, user_0, limit, app_0, true, "");
|
||||
res = a.canAssignToUser(clusterResource, user_0, limit, app_0, "", userResourceLimits);
|
||||
assertFalse(res);
|
||||
assertEquals(Resources.none(), userResourceLimits.getAmountNeededUnreserve());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue