YARN-10049. FIFOOrderingPolicy Improvements. Contributed by Benjamin Teke
This commit is contained in:
parent
d0fa9b5775
commit
481da19494
|
@ -29,6 +29,11 @@ public class FifoComparator
|
|||
@Override
|
||||
public int compare(SchedulableEntity r1, SchedulableEntity r2) {
|
||||
int res = r1.compareInputOrderTo(r2);
|
||||
|
||||
if (res == 0) {
|
||||
res = (int) Math.signum(r1.getStartTime() - r2.getStartTime());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -18,16 +18,19 @@
|
|||
|
||||
package org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.policy;
|
||||
|
||||
import java.util.*;
|
||||
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
|
||||
import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
|
||||
|
||||
import java.util.Arrays;
|
||||
import java.util.Iterator;
|
||||
import java.util.List;
|
||||
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.api.records.Priority;
|
||||
import org.junit.Assert;
|
||||
import org.junit.Test;
|
||||
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.api.records.Priority;
|
||||
|
||||
import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat;
|
||||
|
||||
public class TestFifoOrderingPolicy {
|
||||
public
|
||||
class TestFifoOrderingPolicy {
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFifoOrderingPolicy() {
|
||||
|
@ -36,13 +39,17 @@ public class TestFifoOrderingPolicy {
|
|||
MockSchedulableEntity r1 = new MockSchedulableEntity();
|
||||
MockSchedulableEntity r2 = new MockSchedulableEntity();
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(policy.getComparator().compare(r1, r2)).isEqualTo(0);
|
||||
assertEquals("The comparator should return 0 because the entities are created with " +
|
||||
"the same values.", 0,
|
||||
policy.getComparator().compare(r1, r2));
|
||||
|
||||
r1.setSerial(1);
|
||||
assertThat(policy.getComparator().compare(r1, r2)).isEqualTo(1);
|
||||
assertEquals("The lhs entity has a larger serial, the comparator return " +
|
||||
"value should be 1.", 1, policy.getComparator().compare(r1, r2));
|
||||
|
||||
r2.setSerial(2);
|
||||
assertThat(policy.getComparator().compare(r1, r2)).isEqualTo(-1);
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals("The rhs entity has a larger serial, the comparator return " +
|
||||
"value should be -1.", -1, policy.getComparator().compare(r1, r2));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@ -63,46 +70,80 @@ public class TestFifoOrderingPolicy {
|
|||
schedOrder.addSchedulableEntity(msp3);
|
||||
|
||||
//Assignment, oldest to youngest
|
||||
checkSerials(schedOrder.getAssignmentIterator(IteratorSelector.EMPTY_ITERATOR_SELECTOR), new long[]{1, 2, 3});
|
||||
checkSerials(Arrays.asList(1L, 2L, 3L), schedOrder.getAssignmentIterator(
|
||||
IteratorSelector.EMPTY_ITERATOR_SELECTOR));
|
||||
|
||||
//Preemption, youngest to oldest
|
||||
checkSerials(schedOrder.getPreemptionIterator(), new long[]{3, 2, 1});
|
||||
checkSerials(Arrays.asList(3L, 2L, 1L), schedOrder.getPreemptionIterator());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void checkSerials(Iterator<MockSchedulableEntity> si,
|
||||
long[] serials) {
|
||||
for (int i = 0;i < serials.length;i++) {
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals(si.next().getSerial(),
|
||||
serials[i]);
|
||||
public void checkSerials(List<Long> expectedSerials, Iterator<MockSchedulableEntity>
|
||||
actualSerialIterator) {
|
||||
for (long expectedSerial : expectedSerials) {
|
||||
assertEquals(expectedSerial, actualSerialIterator.next().getSerial());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFifoOrderingPolicyAlongWithPriorty() {
|
||||
public void testFifoOrderingPolicyAlongWithPriority() {
|
||||
FifoOrderingPolicy<MockSchedulableEntity> policy =
|
||||
new FifoOrderingPolicy<MockSchedulableEntity>();
|
||||
MockSchedulableEntity r1 = new MockSchedulableEntity();
|
||||
MockSchedulableEntity r2 = new MockSchedulableEntity();
|
||||
|
||||
Priority p1 = Priority.newInstance(1);
|
||||
Priority p2 = Priority.newInstance(0);
|
||||
assertEquals("Both r1 and r2 priority is null, the comparator should return 0.", 0,
|
||||
policy.getComparator().compare(r1, r2));
|
||||
|
||||
// Both r1 and r1 priority is null
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals(0, policy.getComparator().compare(r1, r2));
|
||||
Priority p2 = Priority.newInstance(0);
|
||||
|
||||
// r1 is null and r2 is not null
|
||||
r2.setApplicationPriority(p2);
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals(-1, policy.getComparator().compare(r1, r2));
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue("The priority of r1 is null, the priority of r2 is not null, " +
|
||||
"the comparator should return a negative value.",
|
||||
policy.getComparator().compare(r1, r2) < 0);
|
||||
|
||||
Priority p1 = Priority.newInstance(1);
|
||||
|
||||
// r1 is not null and r2 is null
|
||||
r2.setApplicationPriority(null);
|
||||
r1.setApplicationPriority(p1);
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals(1, policy.getComparator().compare(r1, r2));
|
||||
r2.setApplicationPriority(null);
|
||||
assertTrue("The priority of r1 is not null, the priority of r2 is null," +
|
||||
"the comparator should return a positive value.",
|
||||
policy.getComparator().compare(r1, r2) > 0);
|
||||
|
||||
// r1 is not null and r2 is not null
|
||||
r1.setApplicationPriority(p1);
|
||||
r2.setApplicationPriority(p2);
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals(-1, policy.getComparator().compare(r1, r2));
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue("Both priorities are not null, the r1 has higher priority, " +
|
||||
"the result should be a negative value.",
|
||||
policy.getComparator().compare(r1, r2) < 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testOrderingUsingAppSubmitTime() {
|
||||
FifoOrderingPolicy<MockSchedulableEntity> policy =
|
||||
new FifoOrderingPolicy<MockSchedulableEntity>();
|
||||
MockSchedulableEntity r1 = new MockSchedulableEntity();
|
||||
MockSchedulableEntity r2 = new MockSchedulableEntity();
|
||||
|
||||
// R1, R2 has been started at same time
|
||||
assertEquals(r1.getStartTime(), r2.getStartTime());
|
||||
|
||||
// No changes, equal
|
||||
assertEquals("The submit times are the same, the comparator should return 0.", 0,
|
||||
policy.getComparator().compare(r1, r2));
|
||||
|
||||
// R2 has been started after R1
|
||||
r1.setStartTime(5);
|
||||
r2.setStartTime(10);
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue("r2 was started after r1, " +
|
||||
"the comparator should return a negative value.",
|
||||
policy.getComparator().compare(r1, r2) < 0);
|
||||
|
||||
// R1 has been started after R2
|
||||
r1.setStartTime(10);
|
||||
r2.setStartTime(5);
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue("r2 was started before r1, the comparator should return a positive value.",
|
||||
policy.getComparator().compare(r1, r2) > 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue