Apache
/
hadoop
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

HDDS-1184. Parallelization of write chunks in datanodes is broken. Contributed by Shashikant Banerjee.

This commit is contained in:
Shashikant Banerjee 2019-03-06 10:00:16 +05:30
parent 945b504c25
commit 62e89dc275
2 changed files with 33 additions and 28 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
hadoop-hdds/common/src/main/proto/DatanodeContainerProtocol.proto
View File

@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ enum Result {
BCSID_MISMATCH = 38;
CONTAINER_NOT_OPEN = 39;
CONTAINER_MISSING = 40;
BLOCK_TOKEN_VERIFICATION_FAILED = 41;
}
/**

60
hadoop-hdds/container-service/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/container/common/transport/server/ratis/ContainerStateMachine.java
View File

@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ import org.apache.hadoop.hdds.HddsUtils;
import org.apache.hadoop.hdds.protocol.datanode.proto.ContainerProtos;
import io.opentracing.Scope;
import org.apache.hadoop.hdds.scm.container.common.helpers.StorageContainerException;
import org.apache.hadoop.ozone.container.common.helpers.ContainerUtils;
import org.apache.ratis.proto.RaftProtos.RaftPeerRole;
import org.apache.ratis.protocol.RaftGroup;
import org.apache.ratis.protocol.RaftGroupId;
@ -350,13 +352,20 @@ public class ContainerStateMachine extends BaseStateMachine {
}
private ContainerCommandResponseProto dispatchCommand(
ContainerCommandRequestProto requestProto,
DispatcherContext context) throws IOException {
ContainerCommandRequestProto requestProto, DispatcherContext context) {
LOG.trace("dispatch {}", requestProto);
if(isBlockTokenEnabled) {
// ServerInterceptors intercepts incoming request and creates ugi.
tokenVerifier.verify(UserGroupInformation.getCurrentUser()
.getShortUserName(), requestProto.getEncodedToken());
if (isBlockTokenEnabled) {
try {
// ServerInterceptors intercepts incoming request and creates ugi.
tokenVerifier
.verify(UserGroupInformation.getCurrentUser().getShortUserName(),
requestProto.getEncodedToken());
} catch (IOException ioe) {
StorageContainerException sce = new StorageContainerException(
"Block token verification failed. " + ioe.getMessage(), ioe,
ContainerProtos.Result.BLOCK_TOKEN_VERIFICATION_FAILED);
return ContainerUtils.logAndReturnError(LOG, sce, requestProto);
}
}
ContainerCommandResponseProto response =
dispatcher.dispatch(requestProto, context);
@ -365,7 +374,7 @@ public class ContainerStateMachine extends BaseStateMachine {
}
private Message runCommand(ContainerCommandRequestProto requestProto,
DispatcherContext context) throws IOException {
DispatcherContext context) {
return dispatchCommand(requestProto, context)::toByteString;
}
@ -394,14 +403,10 @@ public class ContainerStateMachine extends BaseStateMachine {
.setStage(DispatcherContext.WriteChunkStage.WRITE_DATA)
.setCreateContainerSet(createContainerSet)
.build();
CompletableFuture<Message> writeChunkFuture;
try {
Message msg = runCommand(requestProto, context);
writeChunkFuture = CompletableFuture
.supplyAsync(() -> msg, chunkExecutor);
}catch(IOException ie) {
writeChunkFuture = completeExceptionally(ie);
}
// ensure the write chunk happens asynchronously in writeChunkExecutor pool
// thread.
CompletableFuture<Message> writeChunkFuture = CompletableFuture
.supplyAsync(() -> runCommand(requestProto, context), chunkExecutor);
writeChunkFutureMap.put(entryIndex, writeChunkFuture);
LOG.debug("writeChunk writeStateMachineData : blockId " + write.getBlockID()
@ -567,16 +572,18 @@ public class ContainerStateMachine extends BaseStateMachine {
// readStateMachineData should only be called for "write" to Ratis.
Preconditions.checkArgument(!HddsUtils.isReadOnly(requestProto));
if (requestProto.getCmdType() == Type.WriteChunk) {
CompletableFuture<ByteString> future = new CompletableFuture<>();
return future.supplyAsync(() -> {
final CompletableFuture<ByteString> future = new CompletableFuture<>();
CompletableFuture.supplyAsync(() -> {
try {
return getCachedStateMachineData(entry.getIndex(), entry.getTerm(),
requestProto);
future.complete(
getCachedStateMachineData(entry.getIndex(), entry.getTerm(),
requestProto));
} catch (ExecutionException e) {
future.completeExceptionally(e);
return null;
}
return future;
}, chunkExecutor);
return future;
} else {
throw new IllegalStateException("Cmd type:" + requestProto.getCmdType()
+ " cannot have state machine data");
@ -627,7 +634,6 @@ public class ContainerStateMachine extends BaseStateMachine {
ContainerCommandRequestProto requestProto =
getRequestProto(trx.getStateMachineLogEntry().getLogData());
Type cmdType = requestProto.getCmdType();
CompletableFuture<Message> future;
// Make sure that in write chunk, the user data is not set
if (cmdType == Type.WriteChunk) {
Preconditions
@ -638,13 +644,11 @@ public class ContainerStateMachine extends BaseStateMachine {
if (cmdType == Type.WriteChunk || cmdType ==Type.PutSmallFile) {
builder.setCreateContainerSet(createContainerSet);
}
try {
Message msg = runCommand(requestProto, builder.build());
future = CompletableFuture.supplyAsync(() -> msg,
getCommandExecutor(requestProto));
} catch (IOException ie) {
future = completeExceptionally(ie);
}
// Ensure the command gets executed in a separate thread than
// stateMachineUpdater thread which is calling applyTransaction here.
CompletableFuture<Message> future = CompletableFuture
.supplyAsync(() -> runCommand(requestProto, builder.build()),
getCommandExecutor(requestProto));
lastIndex = index;
future.thenAccept(m -> {