YARN-4105. Capacity Scheduler headroom for DRF is wrong. Contributed by Chang Li
This commit is contained in:
parent
40d222e862
commit
6eaca2e363
|
@ -880,6 +880,9 @@ Release 2.7.2 - UNRELEASED
|
|||
YARN-4103. RM WebServices missing scheme for appattempts logLinks.
|
||||
(Jonathan Eagles via vvasudeb)
|
||||
|
||||
YARN-4105. Capacity Scheduler headroom for DRF is wrong (Chang Li via
|
||||
jlowe)
|
||||
|
||||
Release 2.7.1 - 2015-07-06
|
||||
|
||||
INCOMPATIBLE CHANGES
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -878,7 +878,7 @@ public class LeafQueue extends AbstractCSQueue {
|
|||
*
|
||||
*/
|
||||
Resource headroom =
|
||||
Resources.min(resourceCalculator, clusterResource,
|
||||
Resources.componentwiseMin(
|
||||
Resources.subtract(userLimit, user.getUsed()),
|
||||
Resources.subtract(currentResourceLimit, queueUsage.getUsed())
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2916,7 +2916,117 @@ public class TestCapacityScheduler {
|
|||
|
||||
rm.stop();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testHeadRoomCalculationWithDRC() throws Exception {
|
||||
// test with total cluster resource of 20GB memory and 20 vcores.
|
||||
// the queue where two apps running has user limit 0.8
|
||||
// allocate 10GB memory and 1 vcore to app 1.
|
||||
// app 1 should have headroom
|
||||
// 20GB*0.8 - 10GB = 6GB memory available and 15 vcores.
|
||||
// allocate 1GB memory and 1 vcore to app2.
|
||||
// app 2 should have headroom 20GB - 10 - 1 = 1GB memory,
|
||||
// and 20*0.8 - 1 = 15 vcores.
|
||||
|
||||
CapacitySchedulerConfiguration csconf =
|
||||
new CapacitySchedulerConfiguration();
|
||||
csconf.setResourceComparator(DominantResourceCalculator.class);
|
||||
|
||||
YarnConfiguration conf = new YarnConfiguration(csconf);
|
||||
conf.setClass(YarnConfiguration.RM_SCHEDULER, CapacityScheduler.class,
|
||||
ResourceScheduler.class);
|
||||
|
||||
MockRM rm = new MockRM(conf);
|
||||
rm.start();
|
||||
|
||||
CapacityScheduler cs = (CapacityScheduler) rm.getResourceScheduler();
|
||||
LeafQueue qb = (LeafQueue)cs.getQueue("default");
|
||||
qb.setUserLimitFactor((float)0.8);
|
||||
|
||||
// add app 1
|
||||
ApplicationId appId = BuilderUtils.newApplicationId(100, 1);
|
||||
ApplicationAttemptId appAttemptId =
|
||||
BuilderUtils.newApplicationAttemptId(appId, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
RMAppAttemptMetrics attemptMetric =
|
||||
new RMAppAttemptMetrics(appAttemptId, rm.getRMContext());
|
||||
RMAppImpl app = mock(RMAppImpl.class);
|
||||
when(app.getApplicationId()).thenReturn(appId);
|
||||
RMAppAttemptImpl attempt = mock(RMAppAttemptImpl.class);
|
||||
when(attempt.getAppAttemptId()).thenReturn(appAttemptId);
|
||||
when(attempt.getRMAppAttemptMetrics()).thenReturn(attemptMetric);
|
||||
when(app.getCurrentAppAttempt()).thenReturn(attempt);
|
||||
|
||||
rm.getRMContext().getRMApps().put(appId, app);
|
||||
|
||||
SchedulerEvent addAppEvent =
|
||||
new AppAddedSchedulerEvent(appId, "default", "user1");
|
||||
cs.handle(addAppEvent);
|
||||
SchedulerEvent addAttemptEvent =
|
||||
new AppAttemptAddedSchedulerEvent(appAttemptId, false);
|
||||
cs.handle(addAttemptEvent);
|
||||
|
||||
// add app 2
|
||||
ApplicationId appId2 = BuilderUtils.newApplicationId(100, 2);
|
||||
ApplicationAttemptId appAttemptId2 =
|
||||
BuilderUtils.newApplicationAttemptId(appId2, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
RMAppAttemptMetrics attemptMetric2 =
|
||||
new RMAppAttemptMetrics(appAttemptId2, rm.getRMContext());
|
||||
RMAppImpl app2 = mock(RMAppImpl.class);
|
||||
when(app2.getApplicationId()).thenReturn(appId2);
|
||||
RMAppAttemptImpl attempt2 = mock(RMAppAttemptImpl.class);
|
||||
when(attempt2.getAppAttemptId()).thenReturn(appAttemptId2);
|
||||
when(attempt2.getRMAppAttemptMetrics()).thenReturn(attemptMetric2);
|
||||
when(app2.getCurrentAppAttempt()).thenReturn(attempt2);
|
||||
|
||||
rm.getRMContext().getRMApps().put(appId2, app2);
|
||||
addAppEvent =
|
||||
new AppAddedSchedulerEvent(appId2, "default", "user2");
|
||||
cs.handle(addAppEvent);
|
||||
addAttemptEvent =
|
||||
new AppAttemptAddedSchedulerEvent(appAttemptId2, false);
|
||||
cs.handle(addAttemptEvent);
|
||||
|
||||
// add nodes to cluster, so cluster have 20GB and 20 vcores
|
||||
Resource newResource = Resource.newInstance(10 * GB, 10);
|
||||
RMNode node = MockNodes.newNodeInfo(0, newResource, 1, "127.0.0.1");
|
||||
cs.handle(new NodeAddedSchedulerEvent(node));
|
||||
|
||||
Resource newResource2 = Resource.newInstance(10 * GB, 10);
|
||||
RMNode node2 = MockNodes.newNodeInfo(0, newResource2, 1, "127.0.0.2");
|
||||
cs.handle(new NodeAddedSchedulerEvent(node2));
|
||||
|
||||
FiCaSchedulerApp fiCaApp1 =
|
||||
cs.getSchedulerApplications().get(app.getApplicationId())
|
||||
.getCurrentAppAttempt();
|
||||
|
||||
FiCaSchedulerApp fiCaApp2 =
|
||||
cs.getSchedulerApplications().get(app2.getApplicationId())
|
||||
.getCurrentAppAttempt();
|
||||
Priority u0Priority = TestUtils.createMockPriority(1);
|
||||
RecordFactory recordFactory =
|
||||
RecordFactoryProvider.getRecordFactory(null);
|
||||
|
||||
// allocate container for app1 with 10GB memory and 1 vcore
|
||||
fiCaApp1.updateResourceRequests(Collections.singletonList(
|
||||
TestUtils.createResourceRequest(ResourceRequest.ANY, 10*GB, 1, true,
|
||||
u0Priority, recordFactory)));
|
||||
cs.handle(new NodeUpdateSchedulerEvent(node));
|
||||
cs.handle(new NodeUpdateSchedulerEvent(node2));
|
||||
assertEquals(6*GB, fiCaApp1.getHeadroom().getMemory());
|
||||
assertEquals(15, fiCaApp1.getHeadroom().getVirtualCores());
|
||||
|
||||
// allocate container for app2 with 1GB memory and 1 vcore
|
||||
fiCaApp2.updateResourceRequests(Collections.singletonList(
|
||||
TestUtils.createResourceRequest(ResourceRequest.ANY, 1*GB, 1, true,
|
||||
u0Priority, recordFactory)));
|
||||
cs.handle(new NodeUpdateSchedulerEvent(node));
|
||||
cs.handle(new NodeUpdateSchedulerEvent(node2));
|
||||
assertEquals(9*GB, fiCaApp2.getHeadroom().getMemory());
|
||||
assertEquals(15, fiCaApp2.getHeadroom().getVirtualCores());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testDefaultNodeLabelExpressionQueueConfig() throws Exception {
|
||||
CapacityScheduler cs = new CapacityScheduler();
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue