YARN-7172. ResourceCalculator.fitsIn() should not take a cluster resource parameter. (Sen Zhao via wangda)
Change-Id: Icc3670c9381ce7591ca69ec12da5aa52d3612d34
(cherry picked from commit e81596d06d
)
This commit is contained in:
parent
f30f78a736
commit
6f41843906
|
@ -123,8 +123,7 @@ public class DefaultResourceCalculator extends ResourceCalculator {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public boolean fitsIn(Resource cluster,
|
||||
Resource smaller, Resource bigger) {
|
||||
public boolean fitsIn(Resource smaller, Resource bigger) {
|
||||
return smaller.getMemorySize() <= bigger.getMemorySize();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ public class DominantResourceCalculator extends ResourceCalculator {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public boolean fitsIn(Resource cluster, Resource smaller, Resource bigger) {
|
||||
public boolean fitsIn(Resource smaller, Resource bigger) {
|
||||
int maxLength = ResourceUtils.getNumberOfKnownResourceTypes();
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < maxLength; i++) {
|
||||
ResourceInformation sResourceInformation = smaller
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -225,8 +225,7 @@ public abstract class ResourceCalculator {
|
|||
/**
|
||||
* Check if a smaller resource can be contained by bigger resource.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public abstract boolean fitsIn(Resource cluster,
|
||||
Resource smaller, Resource bigger);
|
||||
public abstract boolean fitsIn(Resource smaller, Resource bigger);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Check if resource has any major resource types (which are all NodeManagers
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -437,9 +437,9 @@ public class Resources {
|
|||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public static boolean fitsIn(ResourceCalculator rc, Resource cluster,
|
||||
public static boolean fitsIn(ResourceCalculator rc,
|
||||
Resource smaller, Resource bigger) {
|
||||
return rc.fitsIn(cluster, smaller, bigger);
|
||||
return rc.fitsIn(smaller, bigger);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public static Resource componentwiseMin(Resource lhs, Resource rhs) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -24,14 +24,13 @@ import java.util.Collection;
|
|||
import org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.api.records.Resource;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.conf.YarnConfiguration;
|
||||
import org.junit.Assert;
|
||||
import org.junit.Before;
|
||||
import org.junit.Test;
|
||||
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
|
||||
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized;
|
||||
|
||||
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
|
||||
import static org.junit.Assert.assertFalse;
|
||||
import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
|
||||
|
||||
@RunWith(Parameterized.class)
|
||||
public class TestResourceCalculator {
|
||||
|
@ -64,29 +63,28 @@ public class TestResourceCalculator {
|
|||
|
||||
@Test(timeout = 10000)
|
||||
public void testFitsIn() {
|
||||
Resource cluster = Resource.newInstance(1024, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
if (resourceCalculator instanceof DefaultResourceCalculator) {
|
||||
assertTrue(resourceCalculator.fitsIn(cluster,
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(resourceCalculator.fitsIn(
|
||||
Resource.newInstance(1, 2), Resource.newInstance(2, 1)));
|
||||
assertTrue(resourceCalculator.fitsIn(cluster,
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(resourceCalculator.fitsIn(
|
||||
Resource.newInstance(1, 2), Resource.newInstance(2, 2)));
|
||||
assertTrue(resourceCalculator.fitsIn(cluster,
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(resourceCalculator.fitsIn(
|
||||
Resource.newInstance(1, 2), Resource.newInstance(1, 2)));
|
||||
assertTrue(resourceCalculator.fitsIn(cluster,
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(resourceCalculator.fitsIn(
|
||||
Resource.newInstance(1, 2), Resource.newInstance(1, 1)));
|
||||
assertFalse(resourceCalculator.fitsIn(cluster,
|
||||
Assert.assertFalse(resourceCalculator.fitsIn(
|
||||
Resource.newInstance(2, 1), Resource.newInstance(1, 2)));
|
||||
} else if (resourceCalculator instanceof DominantResourceCalculator) {
|
||||
assertFalse(resourceCalculator.fitsIn(cluster,
|
||||
Assert.assertFalse(resourceCalculator.fitsIn(
|
||||
Resource.newInstance(1, 2), Resource.newInstance(2, 1)));
|
||||
assertTrue(resourceCalculator.fitsIn(cluster,
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(resourceCalculator.fitsIn(
|
||||
Resource.newInstance(1, 2), Resource.newInstance(2, 2)));
|
||||
assertTrue(resourceCalculator.fitsIn(cluster,
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(resourceCalculator.fitsIn(
|
||||
Resource.newInstance(1, 2), Resource.newInstance(1, 2)));
|
||||
assertFalse(resourceCalculator.fitsIn(cluster,
|
||||
Assert.assertFalse(resourceCalculator.fitsIn(
|
||||
Resource.newInstance(1, 2), Resource.newInstance(1, 1)));
|
||||
assertFalse(resourceCalculator.fitsIn(cluster,
|
||||
Assert.assertFalse(resourceCalculator.fitsIn(
|
||||
Resource.newInstance(2, 1), Resource.newInstance(1, 2)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -295,8 +295,7 @@ public class RMServerUtils {
|
|||
// Target resource of the increase request is more than NM can offer
|
||||
ResourceScheduler scheduler = rmContext.getScheduler();
|
||||
RMNode rmNode = request.getSchedulerNode().getRMNode();
|
||||
if (!Resources.fitsIn(scheduler.getResourceCalculator(),
|
||||
scheduler.getClusterResource(), targetResource,
|
||||
if (!Resources.fitsIn(scheduler.getResourceCalculator(), targetResource,
|
||||
rmNode.getTotalCapability())) {
|
||||
String msg = "Target resource=" + targetResource + " of containerId="
|
||||
+ containerId + " is more than node's total resource="
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -156,8 +156,8 @@ public class CapacitySchedulerPreemptionUtils {
|
|||
if (null != toObtainByPartition
|
||||
&& Resources.greaterThan(rc, clusterResource, toObtainByPartition,
|
||||
Resources.none())
|
||||
&& Resources.fitsIn(rc, clusterResource,
|
||||
rmContainer.getAllocatedResource(), totalPreemptionAllowed)
|
||||
&& Resources.fitsIn(rc, rmContainer.getAllocatedResource(),
|
||||
totalPreemptionAllowed)
|
||||
&& !Resources.isAnyMajorResourceZero(rc, toObtainByPartition)) {
|
||||
Resources.subtractFrom(toObtainByPartition,
|
||||
rmContainer.getAllocatedResource());
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -229,8 +229,7 @@ public class QueuePriorityContainerCandidateSelector
|
|||
|
||||
// If we already can allocate the reserved container after preemption,
|
||||
// skip following steps
|
||||
if (Resources.fitsIn(rc, clusterResource, lacking,
|
||||
Resources.none())) {
|
||||
if (Resources.fitsIn(rc, lacking, Resources.none())) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -270,7 +269,7 @@ public class QueuePriorityContainerCandidateSelector
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Lacking <= 0 means we can allocate the reserved container
|
||||
if (Resources.fitsIn(rc, clusterResource, lacking, Resources.none())) {
|
||||
if (Resources.fitsIn(rc, lacking, Resources.none())) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -87,8 +87,8 @@ public class ReservedContainerCandidatesSelector
|
|||
|
||||
// Get list of nodes for preemption, ordered by preemption cost
|
||||
List<NodeForPreemption> nodesForPreemption = getNodesForPreemption(
|
||||
clusterResource, queueToPreemptableResourceByPartition,
|
||||
selectedCandidates, totalPreemptedResourceAllowed);
|
||||
queueToPreemptableResourceByPartition, selectedCandidates,
|
||||
totalPreemptedResourceAllowed);
|
||||
|
||||
for (NodeForPreemption nfp : nodesForPreemption) {
|
||||
RMContainer reservedContainer = nfp.schedulerNode.getReservedContainer();
|
||||
|
@ -97,9 +97,8 @@ public class ReservedContainerCandidatesSelector
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
NodeForPreemption preemptionResult = getPreemptionCandidatesOnNode(
|
||||
nfp.schedulerNode, clusterResource,
|
||||
queueToPreemptableResourceByPartition, selectedCandidates,
|
||||
totalPreemptedResourceAllowed, false);
|
||||
nfp.schedulerNode, queueToPreemptableResourceByPartition,
|
||||
selectedCandidates, totalPreemptedResourceAllowed, false);
|
||||
if (null != preemptionResult) {
|
||||
for (RMContainer c : preemptionResult.selectedContainers) {
|
||||
ApplicationAttemptId appId = c.getApplicationAttemptId();
|
||||
|
@ -135,8 +134,7 @@ public class ReservedContainerCandidatesSelector
|
|||
return preemptable;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private boolean tryToPreemptFromQueue(Resource cluster, String queueName,
|
||||
String partitionName,
|
||||
private boolean tryToPreemptFromQueue(String queueName, String partitionName,
|
||||
Map<String, Map<String, Resource>> queueToPreemptableResourceByPartition,
|
||||
Resource required, Resource totalPreemptionAllowed, boolean readOnly) {
|
||||
Resource preemptable = getPreemptableResource(queueName, partitionName,
|
||||
|
@ -145,11 +143,11 @@ public class ReservedContainerCandidatesSelector
|
|||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!Resources.fitsIn(rc, cluster, required, preemptable)) {
|
||||
if (!Resources.fitsIn(rc, required, preemptable)) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!Resources.fitsIn(rc, cluster, required, totalPreemptionAllowed)) {
|
||||
if (!Resources.fitsIn(rc, required, totalPreemptionAllowed)) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -165,7 +163,6 @@ public class ReservedContainerCandidatesSelector
|
|||
/**
|
||||
* Try to check if we can preempt resources for reserved container in given node
|
||||
* @param node
|
||||
* @param cluster
|
||||
* @param queueToPreemptableResourceByPartition it's a map of
|
||||
* <queueName, <partition, preemptable-resource>>
|
||||
* @param readOnly do we want to modify preemptable resource after we selected
|
||||
|
@ -174,7 +171,7 @@ public class ReservedContainerCandidatesSelector
|
|||
* to satisfy reserved resource
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private NodeForPreemption getPreemptionCandidatesOnNode(
|
||||
FiCaSchedulerNode node, Resource cluster,
|
||||
FiCaSchedulerNode node,
|
||||
Map<String, Map<String, Resource>> queueToPreemptableResourceByPartition,
|
||||
Map<ApplicationAttemptId, Set<RMContainer>> selectedCandidates,
|
||||
Resource totalPreemptionAllowed, boolean readOnly) {
|
||||
|
@ -204,8 +201,7 @@ public class ReservedContainerCandidatesSelector
|
|||
String partition = node.getPartition();
|
||||
|
||||
// Avoid preempt any container if required <= available + killable
|
||||
if (Resources.fitsIn(rc, cluster, reservedContainer.getReservedResource(),
|
||||
cur)) {
|
||||
if (Resources.fitsIn(rc, reservedContainer.getReservedResource(), cur)) {
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -232,9 +228,9 @@ public class ReservedContainerCandidatesSelector
|
|||
|
||||
// Can we preempt container c?
|
||||
// Check if we have quota to preempt this container
|
||||
boolean canPreempt = tryToPreemptFromQueue(cluster, containerQueueName,
|
||||
partition, queueToPreemptableResourceByPartition,
|
||||
c.getAllocatedResource(), totalPreemptionAllowed, readOnly);
|
||||
boolean canPreempt = tryToPreemptFromQueue(containerQueueName, partition,
|
||||
queueToPreemptableResourceByPartition, c.getAllocatedResource(),
|
||||
totalPreemptionAllowed, readOnly);
|
||||
|
||||
// If we can, add to selected container, and change resource accordingly.
|
||||
if (canPreempt) {
|
||||
|
@ -246,7 +242,7 @@ public class ReservedContainerCandidatesSelector
|
|||
Resources.addTo(totalSelected, c.getAllocatedResource());
|
||||
}
|
||||
Resources.addTo(cur, c.getAllocatedResource());
|
||||
if (Resources.fitsIn(rc, cluster,
|
||||
if (Resources.fitsIn(rc,
|
||||
reservedContainer.getReservedResource(), cur)) {
|
||||
canAllocateReservedContainer = true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
@ -282,7 +278,7 @@ public class ReservedContainerCandidatesSelector
|
|||
return nfp;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private List<NodeForPreemption> getNodesForPreemption(Resource cluster,
|
||||
private List<NodeForPreemption> getNodesForPreemption(
|
||||
Map<String, Map<String, Resource>> queueToPreemptableResourceByPartition,
|
||||
Map<ApplicationAttemptId, Set<RMContainer>> selectedCandidates,
|
||||
Resource totalPreemptionAllowed) {
|
||||
|
@ -292,7 +288,7 @@ public class ReservedContainerCandidatesSelector
|
|||
for (FiCaSchedulerNode node : preemptionContext.getScheduler()
|
||||
.getAllNodes()) {
|
||||
if (node.getReservedContainer() != null) {
|
||||
NodeForPreemption nfp = getPreemptionCandidatesOnNode(node, cluster,
|
||||
NodeForPreemption nfp = getPreemptionCandidatesOnNode(node,
|
||||
queueToPreemptableResourceByPartition, selectedCandidates,
|
||||
totalPreemptionAllowed, true);
|
||||
if (null != nfp) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -909,7 +909,7 @@ public abstract class AbstractCSQueue implements CSQueue {
|
|||
maxResourceLimit = labelManager.getResourceByLabel(
|
||||
schedulerContainer.getNodePartition(), cluster);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!Resources.fitsIn(resourceCalculator, cluster,
|
||||
if (!Resources.fitsIn(resourceCalculator,
|
||||
Resources.add(queueUsage.getUsed(partition), netAllocated),
|
||||
maxResourceLimit)) {
|
||||
if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -548,10 +548,7 @@ public class RegularContainerAllocator extends AbstractContainerAllocator {
|
|||
toKillContainers.add(killableContainer);
|
||||
Resources.addTo(availableAndKillable,
|
||||
killableContainer.getAllocatedResource());
|
||||
if (Resources.fitsIn(rc,
|
||||
clusterResource,
|
||||
capability,
|
||||
availableAndKillable)) {
|
||||
if (Resources.fitsIn(rc, capability, availableAndKillable)) {
|
||||
// Stop if we find enough spaces
|
||||
availableContainers = 1;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
@ -579,8 +576,7 @@ public class RegularContainerAllocator extends AbstractContainerAllocator {
|
|||
// under the limit.
|
||||
resourceNeedToUnReserve = capability;
|
||||
}
|
||||
unreservedContainer =
|
||||
application.findNodeToUnreserve(clusterResource, node,
|
||||
unreservedContainer = application.findNodeToUnreserve(node,
|
||||
schedulerKey, resourceNeedToUnReserve);
|
||||
// When (minimum-unreserved-resource > 0 OR we cannot allocate
|
||||
// new/reserved
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -314,7 +314,6 @@ public class FiCaSchedulerApp extends SchedulerApplicationAttempt {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private boolean commonCheckContainerAllocation(
|
||||
Resource cluster,
|
||||
ContainerAllocationProposal<FiCaSchedulerApp, FiCaSchedulerNode> allocation,
|
||||
SchedulerContainer<FiCaSchedulerApp, FiCaSchedulerNode> schedulerContainer) {
|
||||
// Make sure node is not reserved by anyone else
|
||||
|
@ -355,8 +354,7 @@ public class FiCaSchedulerApp extends SchedulerApplicationAttempt {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!Resources.fitsIn(rc, cluster,
|
||||
allocation.getAllocatedOrReservedResource(),
|
||||
if (!Resources.fitsIn(rc, allocation.getAllocatedOrReservedResource(),
|
||||
availableResource)) {
|
||||
if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
|
||||
LOG.debug("Node doesn't have enough available resource, asked="
|
||||
|
@ -419,8 +417,7 @@ public class FiCaSchedulerApp extends SchedulerApplicationAttempt {
|
|||
|
||||
// Common part of check container allocation regardless if it is a
|
||||
// increase container or regular container
|
||||
commonCheckContainerAllocation(cluster, allocation,
|
||||
schedulerContainer);
|
||||
commonCheckContainerAllocation(allocation, schedulerContainer);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Container reserved first time will be NEW, after the container
|
||||
// accepted & confirmed, it will become RESERVED state
|
||||
|
@ -721,9 +718,8 @@ public class FiCaSchedulerApp extends SchedulerApplicationAttempt {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@VisibleForTesting
|
||||
public NodeId getNodeIdToUnreserve(
|
||||
SchedulerRequestKey schedulerKey, Resource resourceNeedUnreserve,
|
||||
ResourceCalculator rc, Resource clusterResource) {
|
||||
public NodeId getNodeIdToUnreserve(SchedulerRequestKey schedulerKey,
|
||||
Resource resourceNeedUnreserve, ResourceCalculator resourceCalculator) {
|
||||
// first go around make this algorithm simple and just grab first
|
||||
// reservation that has enough resources
|
||||
Map<NodeId, RMContainer> reservedContainers = this.reservedContainers.get(
|
||||
|
@ -738,7 +734,7 @@ public class FiCaSchedulerApp extends SchedulerApplicationAttempt {
|
|||
|
||||
// make sure we unreserve one with at least the same amount of
|
||||
// resources, otherwise could affect capacity limits
|
||||
if (Resources.fitsIn(rc, clusterResource, resourceNeedUnreserve,
|
||||
if (Resources.fitsIn(resourceCalculator, resourceNeedUnreserve,
|
||||
reservedResource)) {
|
||||
if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
|
||||
LOG.debug(
|
||||
|
@ -806,14 +802,13 @@ public class FiCaSchedulerApp extends SchedulerApplicationAttempt {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@VisibleForTesting
|
||||
public RMContainer findNodeToUnreserve(Resource clusterResource,
|
||||
FiCaSchedulerNode node, SchedulerRequestKey schedulerKey,
|
||||
Resource minimumUnreservedResource) {
|
||||
public RMContainer findNodeToUnreserve(FiCaSchedulerNode node,
|
||||
SchedulerRequestKey schedulerKey, Resource minimumUnreservedResource) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
readLock.lock();
|
||||
// need to unreserve some other container first
|
||||
NodeId idToUnreserve = getNodeIdToUnreserve(schedulerKey,
|
||||
minimumUnreservedResource, rc, clusterResource);
|
||||
minimumUnreservedResource, rc);
|
||||
if (idToUnreserve == null) {
|
||||
if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
|
||||
LOG.debug("checked to see if could unreserve for app but nothing "
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -897,7 +897,6 @@ public class TestReservations {
|
|||
FiCaSchedulerNode node_1 = TestUtils.getMockNode(host_1, DEFAULT_RACK, 0,
|
||||
8 * GB);
|
||||
|
||||
Resource clusterResource = Resources.createResource(2 * 8 * GB);
|
||||
|
||||
// Setup resource-requests
|
||||
Priority p = TestUtils.createMockPriority(5);
|
||||
|
@ -933,28 +932,27 @@ public class TestReservations {
|
|||
node_0.getNodeID(), "user", rmContext);
|
||||
|
||||
// no reserved containers
|
||||
NodeId unreserveId =
|
||||
app_0.getNodeIdToUnreserve(priorityMap, capability,
|
||||
cs.getResourceCalculator(), clusterResource);
|
||||
NodeId unreserveId = app_0.getNodeIdToUnreserve(priorityMap, capability,
|
||||
cs.getResourceCalculator());
|
||||
assertEquals(null, unreserveId);
|
||||
|
||||
// no reserved containers - reserve then unreserve
|
||||
app_0.reserve(node_0, priorityMap, rmContainer_1, container_1);
|
||||
app_0.unreserve(priorityMap, node_0, rmContainer_1);
|
||||
unreserveId = app_0.getNodeIdToUnreserve(priorityMap, capability,
|
||||
cs.getResourceCalculator(), clusterResource);
|
||||
cs.getResourceCalculator());
|
||||
assertEquals(null, unreserveId);
|
||||
|
||||
// no container large enough is reserved
|
||||
app_0.reserve(node_0, priorityMap, rmContainer_1, container_1);
|
||||
unreserveId = app_0.getNodeIdToUnreserve(priorityMap, capability,
|
||||
cs.getResourceCalculator(), clusterResource);
|
||||
cs.getResourceCalculator());
|
||||
assertEquals(null, unreserveId);
|
||||
|
||||
// reserve one that is now large enough
|
||||
app_0.reserve(node_1, priorityMap, rmContainer, container);
|
||||
unreserveId = app_0.getNodeIdToUnreserve(priorityMap, capability,
|
||||
cs.getResourceCalculator(), clusterResource);
|
||||
cs.getResourceCalculator());
|
||||
assertEquals(node_1.getNodeID(), unreserveId);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1001,16 +999,14 @@ public class TestReservations {
|
|||
node_1.getNodeID(), "user", rmContext);
|
||||
|
||||
// nothing reserved
|
||||
RMContainer toUnreserveContainer =
|
||||
app_0.findNodeToUnreserve(csContext.getClusterResource(), node_1,
|
||||
RMContainer toUnreserveContainer = app_0.findNodeToUnreserve(node_1,
|
||||
priorityMap, capability);
|
||||
assertTrue(toUnreserveContainer == null);
|
||||
|
||||
// reserved but scheduler doesn't know about that node.
|
||||
app_0.reserve(node_1, priorityMap, rmContainer, container);
|
||||
node_1.reserveResource(app_0, priorityMap, rmContainer);
|
||||
toUnreserveContainer =
|
||||
app_0.findNodeToUnreserve(csContext.getClusterResource(), node_1,
|
||||
toUnreserveContainer = app_0.findNodeToUnreserve(node_1,
|
||||
priorityMap, capability);
|
||||
assertTrue(toUnreserveContainer == null);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue