YARN-2534. FairScheduler: Potential integer overflow calculating totalMaxShare. (Zhihai Xu via kasha)
(cherry picked from commit c11ada5ea6
)
This commit is contained in:
parent
fb804ed46c
commit
6f8b2a8e2e
|
@ -297,6 +297,9 @@ Release 2.6.0 - UNRELEASED
|
|||
YARN-2158. Fixed TestRMWebServicesAppsModification#testSingleAppKill test
|
||||
failure. (Varun Vasudev via jianhe)
|
||||
|
||||
YARN-2534. FairScheduler: Potential integer overflow calculating totalMaxShare.
|
||||
(Zhihai Xu via kasha)
|
||||
|
||||
Release 2.5.1 - UNRELEASED
|
||||
|
||||
INCOMPATIBLE CHANGES
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -124,11 +124,10 @@ public class ComputeFairShares {
|
|||
int totalMaxShare = 0;
|
||||
for (Schedulable sched : schedulables) {
|
||||
int maxShare = getResourceValue(sched.getMaxShare(), type);
|
||||
if (maxShare == Integer.MAX_VALUE) {
|
||||
totalMaxShare = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
|
||||
totalMaxShare = (int) Math.min((long)maxShare + (long)totalMaxShare,
|
||||
Integer.MAX_VALUE);
|
||||
if (totalMaxShare == Integer.MAX_VALUE) {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
totalMaxShare += maxShare;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -308,6 +308,54 @@ public class TestFairScheduler extends FairSchedulerTestBase {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFairShareWithMaxResources() throws IOException {
|
||||
conf.set(FairSchedulerConfiguration.ALLOCATION_FILE, ALLOC_FILE);
|
||||
// set queueA and queueB maxResources,
|
||||
// the sum of queueA and queueB maxResources is more than
|
||||
// Integer.MAX_VALUE.
|
||||
PrintWriter out = new PrintWriter(new FileWriter(ALLOC_FILE));
|
||||
out.println("<?xml version=\"1.0\"?>");
|
||||
out.println("<allocations>");
|
||||
out.println("<queue name=\"queueA\">");
|
||||
out.println("<maxResources>1073741824 mb 1000 vcores</maxResources>");
|
||||
out.println("<weight>.25</weight>");
|
||||
out.println("</queue>");
|
||||
out.println("<queue name=\"queueB\">");
|
||||
out.println("<maxResources>1073741824 mb 1000 vcores</maxResources>");
|
||||
out.println("<weight>.75</weight>");
|
||||
out.println("</queue>");
|
||||
out.println("</allocations>");
|
||||
out.close();
|
||||
|
||||
scheduler.init(conf);
|
||||
scheduler.start();
|
||||
scheduler.reinitialize(conf, resourceManager.getRMContext());
|
||||
|
||||
// Add one big node (only care about aggregate capacity)
|
||||
RMNode node1 =
|
||||
MockNodes.newNodeInfo(1, Resources.createResource(8 * 1024, 8), 1,
|
||||
"127.0.0.1");
|
||||
NodeAddedSchedulerEvent nodeEvent1 = new NodeAddedSchedulerEvent(node1);
|
||||
scheduler.handle(nodeEvent1);
|
||||
|
||||
// Queue A wants 1 * 1024.
|
||||
createSchedulingRequest(1 * 1024, "queueA", "user1");
|
||||
// Queue B wants 6 * 1024
|
||||
createSchedulingRequest(6 * 1024, "queueB", "user1");
|
||||
|
||||
scheduler.update();
|
||||
|
||||
FSLeafQueue queue = scheduler.getQueueManager().getLeafQueue(
|
||||
"queueA", false);
|
||||
// queueA's weight is 0.25, so its fair share should be 2 * 1024.
|
||||
assertEquals(2 * 1024, queue.getFairShare().getMemory());
|
||||
// queueB's weight is 0.75, so its fair share should be 6 * 1024.
|
||||
queue = scheduler.getQueueManager().getLeafQueue(
|
||||
"queueB", false);
|
||||
assertEquals(6 * 1024, queue.getFairShare().getMemory());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFairShareWithZeroWeight() throws IOException {
|
||||
conf.set(FairSchedulerConfiguration.ALLOCATION_FILE, ALLOC_FILE);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue