HADOOP-13946. Document how HDFS updates timestamps in the FS spec; compare with object stores. Contributed by Steve Loughran
(cherry picked from commit fd26783aaf
)
This commit is contained in:
parent
4218671f3c
commit
9ea6b24c49
|
@ -392,3 +392,88 @@ Object stores with these characteristics, can not be used as a direct replacemen
|
||||||
for HDFS. In terms of this specification, their implementations of the
|
for HDFS. In terms of this specification, their implementations of the
|
||||||
specified operations do not match those required. They are considered supported
|
specified operations do not match those required. They are considered supported
|
||||||
by the Hadoop development community, but not to the same extent as HDFS.
|
by the Hadoop development community, but not to the same extent as HDFS.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### Timestamps
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
`FileStatus` entries have a modification time and an access time.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. The exact behavior as to when these timestamps are set and whether or not they are valid
|
||||||
|
varies between filesystems, and potentially between individual installations of a filesystem.
|
||||||
|
1. The granularity of the timestamps is again, specific to both a filesystem
|
||||||
|
and potentially individual installations.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The HDFS filesystem does not update the modification time while it is being written to.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Specifically
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* `FileSystem.create()` creation: a zero-byte file is listed; the modification time is
|
||||||
|
set to the current time as seen on the NameNode.
|
||||||
|
* Writes to a file via the output stream returned in the `create()` call: the modification
|
||||||
|
time *does not change*.
|
||||||
|
* When `OutputStream.close()` is called, all remaining data is written, the file closed and
|
||||||
|
the NameNode updated with the final size of the file. The modification time is set to
|
||||||
|
the time the file was closed.
|
||||||
|
* Opening a file for appends via an `append()` operation does not change the modification
|
||||||
|
time of the file until the `close()` call is made on the output stream.
|
||||||
|
* `FileSystem.setTimes()` can be used to explicitly set the time on a file.
|
||||||
|
* When a file is renamed, its modification time is not changed, but the source
|
||||||
|
and destination directories have their modification times updated.
|
||||||
|
* The rarely used operations: `FileSystem.concat()`, `createSnapshot()`,
|
||||||
|
`createSymlink()` and `truncate()` all update the modification time.
|
||||||
|
* The access time granularity is set in milliseconds `dfs.namenode.access.time.precision`;
|
||||||
|
the default granularity is 1 hour. If the precision is set to zero, access times
|
||||||
|
are not recorded.
|
||||||
|
* If a modification or access time is not set, the value of that `FileStatus`
|
||||||
|
field is 0.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Other filesystems may have different behaviors. In particular,
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Access times may or may not be supported; even if the underlying FS may support access times,
|
||||||
|
the option it is often disabled for performance reasons.
|
||||||
|
* The granularity of the timestamps is an implementation-specific detail.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Object stores have an even vaguer view of time, which can be summarized as
|
||||||
|
"it varies".
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* The timestamp granularity is likely to be 1 second, that being the granularity
|
||||||
|
of timestamps returned in HTTP HEAD and GET requests.
|
||||||
|
* Access times are likely to be unset. That is, `FileStatus.getAccessTime() == 0`.
|
||||||
|
* The modification timestamp for a newly created file MAY be that of the
|
||||||
|
`create()` call, or the actual time which the PUT request was initiated.
|
||||||
|
This may be in the `FileSystem.create()` call, the final
|
||||||
|
`OutputStream.close()` operation, some period in between.
|
||||||
|
* The modification time may not be updated in the `close()` call.
|
||||||
|
* The timestamp is likely to be in UTC or the TZ of the object store. If the
|
||||||
|
client is in a different timezone, the timestamp of objects may be ahead or
|
||||||
|
behind that of the client.
|
||||||
|
* Object stores with cached metadata databases (for example: AWS S3 with
|
||||||
|
an in-memory or a DynamoDB metadata store) may have timestamps generated
|
||||||
|
from the local system clock, rather than that of the service.
|
||||||
|
This is an optimization to avoid round-trip calls to the object stores.
|
||||||
|
+ A file's modification time is often the same as its creation time.
|
||||||
|
+ The `FileSystem.setTimes()` operation to set file timestamps *may* be ignored.
|
||||||
|
* `FileSystem.chmod()` may update modification times (example: Azure `wasb://`).
|
||||||
|
* If `FileSystem.append()` is supported, the changes and modification time
|
||||||
|
are likely to only become visible after the output stream is closed.
|
||||||
|
* Out-of-band operations to data in object stores (that is: direct requests
|
||||||
|
to object stores which bypass the Hadoop FileSystem APIs), may result
|
||||||
|
in different timestamps being stored and/or returned.
|
||||||
|
* As the notion of a directory structure is often simulated, the timestamps
|
||||||
|
of directories *may* be artificially generated —perhaps using the current
|
||||||
|
system time.
|
||||||
|
* As `rename()` operations are often implemented as a COPY + DELETE, the
|
||||||
|
timestamps of renamed objects may become that of the time the rename of an
|
||||||
|
object was started, rather than the timestamp of the source object.
|
||||||
|
* The exact timestamp behavior may vary between different object store installations,
|
||||||
|
even with the same timestore client.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Finally, note that the Apache Hadoop project cannot make any guarantees about
|
||||||
|
whether the timestamp behavior of a remote object store will remain consistent
|
||||||
|
over time: they are third-party services, usually accessed via third-party libraries.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The best strategy here is "experiment with the exact endpoint you intend to work with".
|
||||||
|
Furthermore, if you intend to use any caching/consistency layer, test with that
|
||||||
|
feature enabled. Retest after updates to Hadoop releases, and endpoint object
|
||||||
|
store updates.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue