HADOOP-13240. TestAclCommands.testSetfaclValidations fail. Contributed by John Zhuge.
(cherry picked from commit43cf6b101d
) (cherry picked from commit382bcf21e7
)
This commit is contained in:
parent
9442e1d48e
commit
af3c860bb1
|
@ -213,6 +213,10 @@ class AclCommands extends FsCommand {
|
|||
"Missing either <acl_spec> or <path>");
|
||||
}
|
||||
aclEntries = AclEntry.parseAclSpec(args.removeFirst(), !cf.getOpt("x"));
|
||||
if (aclEntries.isEmpty()) {
|
||||
throw new HadoopIllegalArgumentException(
|
||||
"Missing <acl_spec> entry");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (args.isEmpty()) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -43,48 +43,54 @@ import org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RpcNoSuchMethodException;
|
|||
import org.apache.hadoop.util.Progressable;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner;
|
||||
import org.junit.Before;
|
||||
import org.junit.Rule;
|
||||
import org.junit.Test;
|
||||
import org.junit.rules.TemporaryFolder;
|
||||
|
||||
public class TestAclCommands {
|
||||
@Rule
|
||||
public TemporaryFolder testFolder = new TemporaryFolder();
|
||||
|
||||
private String path;
|
||||
|
||||
private Configuration conf = null;
|
||||
|
||||
@Before
|
||||
public void setup() throws IOException {
|
||||
conf = new Configuration();
|
||||
path = testFolder.newFile("file").getPath();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testGetfaclValidations() throws Exception {
|
||||
assertFalse("getfacl should fail without path",
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] { "-getfacl" }));
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] {"-getfacl"}));
|
||||
assertFalse("getfacl should fail with extra argument",
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] { "-getfacl", "/test", "extraArg" }));
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] {"-getfacl", path, "extraArg"}));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testSetfaclValidations() throws Exception {
|
||||
assertFalse("setfacl should fail without options",
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] { "-setfacl", "/" }));
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] {"-setfacl", path}));
|
||||
assertFalse("setfacl should fail without options -b, -k, -m, -x or --set",
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] { "-setfacl", "-R", "/" }));
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] {"-setfacl", "-R", path}));
|
||||
assertFalse("setfacl should fail without path",
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] { "-setfacl" }));
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] {"-setfacl"}));
|
||||
assertFalse("setfacl should fail without aclSpec",
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] { "-setfacl", "-m", "/path" }));
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] {"-setfacl", "-m", path}));
|
||||
assertFalse("setfacl should fail with conflicting options",
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] { "-setfacl", "-m", "/path" }));
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] {"-setfacl", "-m", path}));
|
||||
assertFalse("setfacl should fail with extra arguments",
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] { "-setfacl", "/path", "extra" }));
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] {"-setfacl", path, "extra"}));
|
||||
assertFalse("setfacl should fail with extra arguments",
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] { "-setfacl", "--set",
|
||||
"default:user::rwx", "/path", "extra" }));
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] {"-setfacl", "--set",
|
||||
"default:user::rwx", path, "extra"}));
|
||||
assertFalse("setfacl should fail with permissions for -x",
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] { "-setfacl", "-x", "user:user1:rwx",
|
||||
"/path" }));
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] {"-setfacl", "-x", "user:user1:rwx",
|
||||
path}));
|
||||
assertFalse("setfacl should fail ACL spec missing",
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] { "-setfacl", "-m",
|
||||
"", "/path" }));
|
||||
0 == runCommand(new String[] {"-setfacl", "-m", "", path}));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue