HDFS-10817. Add Logging for Long-held NN Read Locks. Contributed by Erik Krogen.
(cherry picked from commit 6f4b0d33ca
)
This commit is contained in:
parent
72d90cbe32
commit
f87e2f5d05
|
@ -384,10 +384,14 @@ public class DFSConfigKeys extends CommonConfigurationKeys {
|
|||
public static final long
|
||||
DFS_NAMENODE_MAX_LOCK_HOLD_TO_RELEASE_LEASE_MS_DEFAULT = 25;
|
||||
|
||||
// Threshold for how long a write lock must be held for the event to be logged
|
||||
// Threshold for how long namenode locks must be held for the
|
||||
// event to be logged
|
||||
public static final String DFS_NAMENODE_WRITE_LOCK_REPORTING_THRESHOLD_MS_KEY =
|
||||
"dfs.namenode.write-lock-reporting-threshold-ms";
|
||||
public static final long DFS_NAMENODE_WRITE_LOCK_REPORTING_THRESHOLD_MS_DEFAULT = 1000L;
|
||||
public static final String DFS_NAMENODE_READ_LOCK_REPORTING_THRESHOLD_MS_KEY =
|
||||
"dfs.namenode.read-lock-reporting-threshold-ms";
|
||||
public static final long DFS_NAMENODE_READ_LOCK_REPORTING_THRESHOLD_MS_DEFAULT = 5000L;
|
||||
|
||||
public static final String DFS_UPGRADE_DOMAIN_FACTOR = "dfs.namenode.upgrade.domain.factor";
|
||||
public static final int DFS_UPGRADE_DOMAIN_FACTOR_DEFAULT = DFS_REPLICATION_DEFAULT;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ import static org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_RESOURCE_CHECK_I
|
|||
import static org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_RESOURCE_CHECK_INTERVAL_KEY;
|
||||
import static org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_WRITE_LOCK_REPORTING_THRESHOLD_MS_KEY;
|
||||
import static org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_WRITE_LOCK_REPORTING_THRESHOLD_MS_DEFAULT;
|
||||
import static org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_READ_LOCK_REPORTING_THRESHOLD_MS_KEY;
|
||||
import static org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_READ_LOCK_REPORTING_THRESHOLD_MS_DEFAULT;
|
||||
import static org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_RETRY_CACHE_EXPIRYTIME_MILLIS_DEFAULT;
|
||||
import static org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_RETRY_CACHE_EXPIRYTIME_MILLIS_KEY;
|
||||
import static org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_RETRY_CACHE_HEAP_PERCENT_DEFAULT;
|
||||
|
@ -812,6 +814,9 @@ public class FSNamesystem implements Namesystem, FSNamesystemMBean,
|
|||
this.writeLockReportingThreshold = conf.getLong(
|
||||
DFS_NAMENODE_WRITE_LOCK_REPORTING_THRESHOLD_MS_KEY,
|
||||
DFS_NAMENODE_WRITE_LOCK_REPORTING_THRESHOLD_MS_DEFAULT);
|
||||
this.readLockReportingThreshold = conf.getLong(
|
||||
DFS_NAMENODE_READ_LOCK_REPORTING_THRESHOLD_MS_KEY,
|
||||
DFS_NAMENODE_READ_LOCK_REPORTING_THRESHOLD_MS_DEFAULT);
|
||||
|
||||
// For testing purposes, allow the DT secret manager to be started regardless
|
||||
// of whether security is enabled.
|
||||
|
@ -1495,14 +1500,41 @@ public class FSNamesystem implements Namesystem, FSNamesystemMBean,
|
|||
private long writeLockReportingThreshold;
|
||||
/** Last time stamp for write lock. Keep the longest one for multi-entrance.*/
|
||||
private long writeLockHeldTimeStamp;
|
||||
/** Threshold (ms) for long holding read lock report. */
|
||||
private long readLockReportingThreshold;
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Last time stamp for read lock. Keep the longest one for
|
||||
* multi-entrance. This is ThreadLocal since there could be
|
||||
* many read locks held simultaneously.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private static ThreadLocal<Long> readLockHeldTimeStamp =
|
||||
new ThreadLocal<Long>() {
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public Long initialValue() {
|
||||
return Long.MAX_VALUE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void readLock() {
|
||||
this.fsLock.readLock().lock();
|
||||
if (this.fsLock.getReadHoldCount() == 1) {
|
||||
readLockHeldTimeStamp.set(monotonicNow());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void readUnlock() {
|
||||
final boolean needReport = this.fsLock.getReadHoldCount() == 1;
|
||||
final long readLockInterval = monotonicNow() - readLockHeldTimeStamp.get();
|
||||
this.fsLock.readLock().unlock();
|
||||
|
||||
if (needReport) {
|
||||
readLockHeldTimeStamp.remove();
|
||||
if (readLockInterval > this.readLockReportingThreshold) {
|
||||
LOG.info("FSNamesystem read lock held for " + readLockInterval +
|
||||
" ms via\n" + StringUtils.getStackTrace(Thread.currentThread()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void writeLock() {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2635,6 +2635,15 @@
|
|||
</description>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
|
||||
<property>
|
||||
<name>dfs.namenode.read-lock-reporting-threshold-ms</name>
|
||||
<value>5000</value>
|
||||
<description>When a read lock is held on the namenode for a long time,
|
||||
this will be logged as the lock is released. This sets how long the
|
||||
lock must be held for logging to occur.
|
||||
</description>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
|
||||
<property>
|
||||
<name>dfs.namenode.startup.delay.block.deletion.sec</name>
|
||||
<value>0</value>
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ import java.io.File;
|
|||
import java.io.IOException;
|
||||
import java.net.InetAddress;
|
||||
import java.net.URI;
|
||||
import java.util.ArrayList;
|
||||
import java.util.Collection;
|
||||
|
||||
import com.google.common.base.Supplier;
|
||||
|
@ -58,6 +59,7 @@ import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
|
|||
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException;
|
||||
import java.util.regex.Pattern;
|
||||
|
||||
public class TestFSNamesystem {
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -286,10 +288,11 @@ public class TestFSNamesystem {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Test when FSNamesystem lock is held for a long time, logger will report it.
|
||||
* Test when FSNamesystem write lock is held for a long time,
|
||||
* logger will report it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Test(timeout=45000)
|
||||
public void testFSLockLongHoldingReport() throws Exception {
|
||||
public void testFSWriteLockLongHoldingReport() throws Exception {
|
||||
final long writeLockReportingThreshold = 100L;
|
||||
Configuration conf = new Configuration();
|
||||
conf.setLong(DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_WRITE_LOCK_REPORTING_THRESHOLD_MS_KEY,
|
||||
|
@ -297,7 +300,7 @@ public class TestFSNamesystem {
|
|||
FSImage fsImage = Mockito.mock(FSImage.class);
|
||||
FSEditLog fsEditLog = Mockito.mock(FSEditLog.class);
|
||||
Mockito.when(fsImage.getEditLog()).thenReturn(fsEditLog);
|
||||
FSNamesystem fsn = new FSNamesystem(conf, fsImage);
|
||||
final FSNamesystem fsn = new FSNamesystem(conf, fsImage);
|
||||
|
||||
LogCapturer logs = LogCapturer.captureLogs(FSNamesystem.LOG);
|
||||
GenericTestUtils.setLogLevel(FSNamesystem.LOG, Level.INFO);
|
||||
|
@ -341,6 +344,143 @@ public class TestFSNamesystem {
|
|||
assertTrue(logs.getOutput().contains(GenericTestUtils.getMethodName()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Test when FSNamesystem read lock is held for a long time,
|
||||
* logger will report it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Test(timeout=45000)
|
||||
public void testFSReadLockLongHoldingReport() throws Exception {
|
||||
final long readLockReportingThreshold = 100L;
|
||||
final String readLockLogStmt = "FSNamesystem read lock held for ";
|
||||
Configuration conf = new Configuration();
|
||||
conf.setLong(
|
||||
DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_READ_LOCK_REPORTING_THRESHOLD_MS_KEY,
|
||||
readLockReportingThreshold);
|
||||
FSImage fsImage = Mockito.mock(FSImage.class);
|
||||
FSEditLog fsEditLog = Mockito.mock(FSEditLog.class);
|
||||
Mockito.when(fsImage.getEditLog()).thenReturn(fsEditLog);
|
||||
final FSNamesystem fsn = new FSNamesystem(conf, fsImage);
|
||||
|
||||
LogCapturer logs = LogCapturer.captureLogs(FSNamesystem.LOG);
|
||||
GenericTestUtils.setLogLevel(FSNamesystem.LOG, Level.INFO);
|
||||
|
||||
// Don't report if the read lock is held for a short time
|
||||
fsn.readLock();
|
||||
Thread.sleep(readLockReportingThreshold / 2);
|
||||
fsn.readUnlock();
|
||||
assertFalse(logs.getOutput().contains(GenericTestUtils.getMethodName()) &&
|
||||
logs.getOutput().contains(readLockLogStmt));
|
||||
|
||||
// Report if the read lock is held for a long time
|
||||
fsn.readLock();
|
||||
Thread.sleep(readLockReportingThreshold + 10);
|
||||
logs.clearOutput();
|
||||
fsn.readUnlock();
|
||||
assertTrue(logs.getOutput().contains(GenericTestUtils.getMethodName())
|
||||
&& logs.getOutput().contains(readLockLogStmt));
|
||||
|
||||
// Report if it's held for a long time when re-entering read lock
|
||||
fsn.readLock();
|
||||
Thread.sleep(readLockReportingThreshold / 2 + 1);
|
||||
fsn.readLock();
|
||||
Thread.sleep(readLockReportingThreshold / 2 + 1);
|
||||
logs.clearOutput();
|
||||
fsn.readUnlock();
|
||||
assertFalse(logs.getOutput().contains(GenericTestUtils.getMethodName()) ||
|
||||
logs.getOutput().contains(readLockLogStmt));
|
||||
logs.clearOutput();
|
||||
fsn.readUnlock();
|
||||
assertTrue(logs.getOutput().contains(GenericTestUtils.getMethodName()) &&
|
||||
logs.getOutput().contains(readLockLogStmt));
|
||||
|
||||
// Report if it's held for a long time while another thread also has the
|
||||
// read lock. Let one thread hold the lock long enough to activate an
|
||||
// alert, then have another thread grab the read lock to ensure that this
|
||||
// doesn't reset the timing.
|
||||
logs.clearOutput();
|
||||
final CountDownLatch barrier = new CountDownLatch(1);
|
||||
final CountDownLatch barrier2 = new CountDownLatch(1);
|
||||
Thread t1 = new Thread() {
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void run() {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
fsn.readLock();
|
||||
Thread.sleep(readLockReportingThreshold + 1);
|
||||
barrier.countDown(); // Allow for t2 to acquire the read lock
|
||||
barrier2.await(); // Wait until t2 has the read lock
|
||||
fsn.readUnlock();
|
||||
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
|
||||
fail("Interrupted during testing");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
Thread t2 = new Thread() {
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void run() {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
barrier.await(); // Wait until t1 finishes sleeping
|
||||
fsn.readLock();
|
||||
barrier2.countDown(); // Allow for t1 to unlock
|
||||
fsn.readUnlock();
|
||||
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
|
||||
fail("Interrupted during testing");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
t1.start();
|
||||
t2.start();
|
||||
t1.join();
|
||||
t2.join();
|
||||
Pattern t1Pattern = Pattern.compile(
|
||||
String.format("\\Q%s\\E.+%s", t1.getName(), readLockLogStmt));
|
||||
assertTrue(t1Pattern.matcher(logs.getOutput()).find());
|
||||
Pattern t2Pattern = Pattern.compile(
|
||||
String.format("\\Q%s\\E.+%s", t2.getName(), readLockLogStmt));
|
||||
assertFalse(t2Pattern.matcher(logs.getOutput()).find());
|
||||
|
||||
// Spin up a bunch of threads all grabbing the lock at once; assign some
|
||||
// to go over threshold and some under. Check that they all log correctly.
|
||||
logs.clearOutput();
|
||||
final int threadCount = 50;
|
||||
List<Thread> threads = new ArrayList<>(threadCount);
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < threadCount; i++) {
|
||||
threads.add(new Thread() {
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void run() {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
long sleepTime;
|
||||
if (this.getName().hashCode() % 2 == 0) {
|
||||
sleepTime = readLockReportingThreshold + 10;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
sleepTime = readLockReportingThreshold / 2;
|
||||
}
|
||||
fsn.readLock();
|
||||
Thread.sleep(sleepTime);
|
||||
fsn.readUnlock();
|
||||
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
|
||||
fail("Interrupted during testing");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (Thread t : threads) {
|
||||
t.start();
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (Thread t : threads) {
|
||||
t.join();
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (Thread t : threads) {
|
||||
Pattern p = Pattern.compile(
|
||||
String.format("\\Q%s\\E.+%s", t.getName(), readLockLogStmt));
|
||||
boolean foundLog = p.matcher(logs.getOutput()).find();
|
||||
if (t.getName().hashCode() % 2 == 0) {
|
||||
assertTrue(foundLog);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
assertFalse(foundLog);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testSafemodeReplicationConf() throws IOException {
|
||||
Configuration conf = new Configuration();
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue