HBASE-18216 [AMv2] Workaround for HBASE-18152, corrupt procedure WAL
This commit is contained in:
parent
cb88b64629
commit
0b43353bf7
|
@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ public class ProcedureWALFormatReader {
|
|||
private static final Log LOG = LogFactory.getLog(ProcedureWALFormatReader.class);
|
||||
|
||||
// ==============================================================================================
|
||||
// We read the WALs in reverse order. from the newest to the oldest.
|
||||
// We read the WALs in reverse order from the newest to the oldest.
|
||||
// We have different entry types:
|
||||
// - INIT: Procedure submitted by the user (also known as 'root procedure')
|
||||
// - INSERT: Children added to the procedure <parentId>:[<childId>, ...]
|
||||
|
@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ public class ProcedureWALFormatReader {
|
|||
//
|
||||
// In the WAL we can find multiple times the same procedure as UPDATE or INSERT.
|
||||
// We read the WAL from top to bottom, so every time we find an entry of the
|
||||
// same procedure, that will be the "latest" update.
|
||||
// same procedure, that will be the "latest" update (Caveat: with multiple threads writing
|
||||
// the store, this assumption does not hold).
|
||||
//
|
||||
// We keep two in-memory maps:
|
||||
// - localProcedureMap: is the map containing the entries in the WAL we are processing
|
||||
|
@ -65,7 +66,7 @@ public class ProcedureWALFormatReader {
|
|||
//
|
||||
// The WAL is append-only so the last procedure in the WAL is the one that
|
||||
// was in execution at the time we crashed/closed the server.
|
||||
// given that, the procedure replay order can be inferred by the WAL order.
|
||||
// Given that, the procedure replay order can be inferred by the WAL order.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Example:
|
||||
// WAL-2: [A, B, A, C, D]
|
||||
|
@ -78,7 +79,7 @@ public class ProcedureWALFormatReader {
|
|||
// WAL-2 localProcedureMap.replayOrder is [D, C, A, B]
|
||||
// WAL-1 localProcedureMap.replayOrder is [F, G]
|
||||
//
|
||||
// each time we reach the WAL-EOF, the "replayOrder" list is merged/appended in 'procedureMap'
|
||||
// Each time we reach the WAL-EOF, the "replayOrder" list is merged/appended in 'procedureMap'
|
||||
// so using the example above we end up with: [D, C, A, B] + [F, G] as replay order.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Fast Start: INIT/INSERT record and StackIDs
|
||||
|
@ -183,12 +184,12 @@ public class ProcedureWALFormatReader {
|
|||
procedureMap.mergeTail(localProcedureMap);
|
||||
|
||||
//if (hasFastStartSupport) {
|
||||
// TODO: Some procedure may be already runnables (see readInitEntry())
|
||||
// (we can also check the "update map" in the log trackers)
|
||||
// --------------------------------------------------
|
||||
//EntryIterator iter = procedureMap.fetchReady();
|
||||
//if (iter != null) loader.load(iter);
|
||||
// --------------------------------------------------
|
||||
// TODO: Some procedure may be already runnables (see readInitEntry())
|
||||
// (we can also check the "update map" in the log trackers)
|
||||
// --------------------------------------------------
|
||||
//EntryIterator iter = procedureMap.fetchReady();
|
||||
//if (iter != null) loader.load(iter);
|
||||
// --------------------------------------------------
|
||||
//}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -224,7 +225,7 @@ public class ProcedureWALFormatReader {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private void readInitEntry(final ProcedureWALEntry entry)
|
||||
throws IOException {
|
||||
throws IOException {
|
||||
assert entry.getProcedureCount() == 1 : "Expected only one procedure";
|
||||
loadProcedure(entry, entry.getProcedure(0));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -319,12 +320,25 @@ public class ProcedureWALFormatReader {
|
|||
protected ProcedureProtos.Procedure proto;
|
||||
protected boolean ready = false;
|
||||
|
||||
public Entry(Entry hashNext) { this.hashNext = hashNext; }
|
||||
public Entry(Entry hashNext) {
|
||||
this.hashNext = hashNext;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public long getProcId() { return proto.getProcId(); }
|
||||
public long getParentId() { return proto.getParentId(); }
|
||||
public boolean hasParent() { return proto.hasParentId(); }
|
||||
public boolean isReady() { return ready; }
|
||||
public long getProcId() {
|
||||
return proto.getProcId();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public long getParentId() {
|
||||
return proto.getParentId();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public boolean hasParent() {
|
||||
return proto.hasParentId();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public boolean isReady() {
|
||||
return ready;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public boolean isFinished() {
|
||||
if (!hasParent()) {
|
||||
|
@ -443,11 +457,17 @@ public class ProcedureWALFormatReader {
|
|||
public void add(ProcedureProtos.Procedure procProto) {
|
||||
trackProcIds(procProto.getProcId());
|
||||
Entry entry = addToMap(procProto.getProcId(), procProto.hasParentId());
|
||||
boolean isNew = entry.proto == null;
|
||||
entry.proto = procProto;
|
||||
boolean newEntry = entry.proto == null;
|
||||
// We have seen procedure WALs where the entries are out of order; see HBASE-18152.
|
||||
// To compensate, only replace the Entry procedure if for sure this new procedure
|
||||
// is indeed an entry that came later. TODO: Fix the writing of procedure info so
|
||||
// it does not violate basic expectation, that WALs contain procedure changes going
|
||||
// from start to finish in sequence.
|
||||
if (newEntry || isIncreasing(entry.proto, procProto)) {
|
||||
entry.proto = procProto;
|
||||
}
|
||||
addToReplayList(entry);
|
||||
|
||||
if (isNew) {
|
||||
if(newEntry) {
|
||||
if (procProto.hasParentId()) {
|
||||
childUnlinkedHead = addToLinkList(entry, childUnlinkedHead);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
@ -456,6 +476,21 @@ public class ProcedureWALFormatReader {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @return True if this new procedure is 'richer' than the current one else
|
||||
* false and we log this incidence where it appears that the WAL has older entries
|
||||
* appended after newer ones. See HBASE-18152.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private static boolean isIncreasing(ProcedureProtos.Procedure current,
|
||||
ProcedureProtos.Procedure candidate) {
|
||||
boolean increasing = current.getStackIdCount() < candidate.getStackIdCount() &&
|
||||
current.getLastUpdate() <= candidate.getLastUpdate();
|
||||
if (!increasing) {
|
||||
LOG.warn("NOT INCREASING! current=" + current + ", candidate=" + candidate);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return increasing;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public boolean remove(long procId) {
|
||||
trackProcIds(procId);
|
||||
Entry entry = removeFromMap(procId);
|
||||
|
@ -634,7 +669,7 @@ public class ProcedureWALFormatReader {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* (see the comprehensive explaination in the beginning of the file)
|
||||
* (see the comprehensive explanation in the beginning of the file)
|
||||
* A Procedure is ready when parent and children are ready.
|
||||
* "ready" means that we all the information that we need in-memory.
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
@ -651,9 +686,9 @@ public class ProcedureWALFormatReader {
|
|||
* - easy case, the parent is missing from the global map
|
||||
* - more complex case we look at the Stack IDs.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The Stack-IDs are added to the procedure order as incremental index
|
||||
* The Stack-IDs are added to the procedure order as an incremental index
|
||||
* tracking how many times that procedure was executed, which is equivalent
|
||||
* at the number of times we wrote the procedure to the WAL.
|
||||
* to the number of times we wrote the procedure to the WAL.
|
||||
* In the example above:
|
||||
* wal-2: B has stackId = [1, 2]
|
||||
* wal-1: B has stackId = [1]
|
||||
|
@ -663,7 +698,7 @@ public class ProcedureWALFormatReader {
|
|||
* we notice that there is a gap in the stackIds of B, so something was
|
||||
* executed before.
|
||||
* To identify when a Procedure is ready we do the sum of the stackIds of
|
||||
* the procedure and the parent. if the stackIdSum is equals to the
|
||||
* the procedure and the parent. if the stackIdSum is equal to the
|
||||
* sum of {1..maxStackId} then everything we need is available.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Example-2
|
||||
|
@ -695,6 +730,10 @@ public class ProcedureWALFormatReader {
|
|||
int stackId = 1 + rootEntry.proto.getStackId(i);
|
||||
maxStackId = Math.max(maxStackId, stackId);
|
||||
stackIdSum += stackId;
|
||||
if (LOG.isTraceEnabled()) {
|
||||
LOG.trace("stackId=" + stackId + " stackIdSum=" + stackIdSum +
|
||||
" maxStackid=" + maxStackId + " " + rootEntry);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (Entry p = rootEntry.childHead; p != null; p = p.linkNext) {
|
||||
|
@ -702,8 +741,14 @@ public class ProcedureWALFormatReader {
|
|||
int stackId = 1 + p.proto.getStackId(i);
|
||||
maxStackId = Math.max(maxStackId, stackId);
|
||||
stackIdSum += stackId;
|
||||
if (LOG.isTraceEnabled()) {
|
||||
LOG.trace("stackId=" + stackId + " stackIdSum=" + stackIdSum +
|
||||
" maxStackid=" + maxStackId + " " + p);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// The cmpStackIdSum is this formula for finding the sum of a series of numbers:
|
||||
// http://www.wikihow.com/Sum-the-Integers-from-1-to-N#/Image:Sum-the-Integers-from-1-to-N-Step-2-Version-3.jpg
|
||||
final int cmpStackIdSum = (maxStackId * (maxStackId + 1) / 2);
|
||||
if (cmpStackIdSum == stackIdSum) {
|
||||
rootEntry.ready = true;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue