HBASE-20847 The parent procedure of RegionTransitionProcedure may not have the table lock

This commit is contained in:
zhangduo 2018-07-11 17:34:35 +08:00
parent 8de69db143
commit 113652eb88
7 changed files with 147 additions and 77 deletions

View File

@ -253,22 +253,16 @@ public abstract class AbstractProcedureScheduler implements ProcedureScheduler {
* Wakes up given waiting procedures by pushing them back into scheduler queues.
* @return size of given {@code waitQueue}.
*/
protected int wakeWaitingProcedures(final ProcedureDeque waitQueue) {
int count = waitQueue.size();
// wakeProcedure adds to the front of queue, so we start from last in the
// waitQueue' queue, so that the procedure which was added first goes in the front for
// the scheduler queue.
addFront(waitQueue.descendingIterator());
waitQueue.clear();
return count;
protected int wakeWaitingProcedures(LockAndQueue lockAndQueue) {
return lockAndQueue.wakeWaitingProcedures(this);
}
protected void waitProcedure(final ProcedureDeque waitQueue, final Procedure proc) {
waitQueue.addLast(proc);
protected void waitProcedure(LockAndQueue lockAndQueue, final Procedure proc) {
lockAndQueue.addLast(proc);
}
protected void wakeProcedure(final Procedure procedure) {
if (LOG.isTraceEnabled()) LOG.trace("Wake " + procedure);
LOG.trace("Wake {}", procedure);
push(procedure, /* addFront= */ true, /* notify= */false);
}
@ -285,7 +279,9 @@ public abstract class AbstractProcedureScheduler implements ProcedureScheduler {
}
protected void wakePollIfNeeded(final int waitingCount) {
if (waitingCount <= 0) return;
if (waitingCount <= 0) {
return;
}
if (waitingCount == 1) {
schedWaitCond.signal();
} else {

View File

@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
package org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure2;
import java.util.function.Predicate;
import java.util.stream.Stream;
import org.apache.yetus.audience.InterfaceAudience;
/**
@ -45,7 +47,8 @@ import org.apache.yetus.audience.InterfaceAudience;
* We do not use ReentrantReadWriteLock directly because of its high memory overhead.
*/
@InterfaceAudience.Private
public class LockAndQueue extends ProcedureDeque implements LockStatus {
public class LockAndQueue implements LockStatus {
private final ProcedureDeque queue = new ProcedureDeque();
private Procedure<?> exclusiveLockOwnerProcedure = null;
private int sharedLock = 0;
@ -69,12 +72,14 @@ public class LockAndQueue extends ProcedureDeque implements LockStatus {
}
@Override
public boolean hasParentLock(final Procedure proc) {
return proc.hasParent() && (isLockOwner(proc.getParentProcId()) || isLockOwner(proc.getRootProcId()));
public boolean hasParentLock(Procedure<?> proc) {
// TODO: need to check all the ancestors
return proc.hasParent() &&
(isLockOwner(proc.getParentProcId()) || isLockOwner(proc.getRootProcId()));
}
@Override
public boolean hasLockAccess(final Procedure proc) {
public boolean hasLockAccess(Procedure<?> proc) {
return isLockOwner(proc.getProcId()) || hasParentLock(proc);
}
@ -101,37 +106,87 @@ public class LockAndQueue extends ProcedureDeque implements LockStatus {
// try/release Shared/Exclusive lock
// ======================================================================
public boolean trySharedLock() {
if (hasExclusiveLock()) return false;
/**
* @return whether we have succesfully acquired the shared lock.
*/
public boolean trySharedLock(Procedure<?> proc) {
if (hasExclusiveLock() && !hasLockAccess(proc)) {
return false;
}
// If no one holds the xlock, then we are free to hold the sharedLock
// If the parent proc or we have already held the xlock, then we return true here as
// xlock is more powerful then shared lock.
sharedLock++;
return true;
}
/**
* @return whether we should wake the procedures waiting on the lock here.
*/
public boolean releaseSharedLock() {
return --sharedLock == 0;
// hasExclusiveLock could be true, it usually means we acquire shared lock while we or our
// parent have held the xlock. And since there is still an exclusive lock, we do not need to
// wake any procedures.
return --sharedLock == 0 && !hasExclusiveLock();
}
public boolean tryExclusiveLock(final Procedure proc) {
if (isLocked()) return hasLockAccess(proc);
public boolean tryExclusiveLock(Procedure<?> proc) {
if (isLocked()) {
return hasLockAccess(proc);
}
exclusiveLockOwnerProcedure = proc;
return true;
}
/**
* @return True if we released a lock.
* @return whether we should wake the procedures waiting on the lock here.
*/
public boolean releaseExclusiveLock(final Procedure proc) {
if (isLockOwner(proc.getProcId())) {
exclusiveLockOwnerProcedure = null;
return true;
public boolean releaseExclusiveLock(Procedure<?> proc) {
if (!isLockOwner(proc.getProcId())) {
// We are not the lock owner, it is probably inherited from the parent procedures.
return false;
}
return false;
exclusiveLockOwnerProcedure = null;
// This maybe a bit strange so let me explain. We allow acquiring shared lock while the parent
// proc or we have already held the xlock, and also allow releasing the locks in any order, so
// it could happen that the xlock is released but there are still some procs holding the shared
// lock.
// In HBase, this could happen when a proc which holdLock is false and schedules sub procs which
// acquire the shared lock on the same lock. This is because we will schedule the sub proces
// before releasing the lock, so the sub procs could call acquire lock before we releasing the
// xlock.
return sharedLock == 0;
}
public boolean isWaitingQueueEmpty() {
return queue.isEmpty();
}
public Procedure<?> removeFirst() {
return queue.removeFirst();
}
public void addLast(Procedure<?> proc) {
queue.addLast(proc);
}
public int wakeWaitingProcedures(ProcedureScheduler scheduler) {
int count = queue.size();
// wakeProcedure adds to the front of queue, so we start from last in the waitQueue' queue, so
// that the procedure which was added first goes in the front for the scheduler queue.
scheduler.addFront(queue.descendingIterator());
queue.clear();
return count;
}
@SuppressWarnings("rawtypes")
public Stream<Procedure> filterWaitingQueue(Predicate<Procedure> predicate) {
return queue.stream().filter(predicate);
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return "exclusiveLockOwner=" + (hasExclusiveLock()? getExclusiveLockProcIdOwner(): "NONE") +
", sharedLockCount=" + getSharedLockCount() +
", waitingProcCount=" + size();
return "exclusiveLockOwner=" + (hasExclusiveLock() ? getExclusiveLockProcIdOwner() : "NONE") +
", sharedLockCount=" + getSharedLockCount() + ", waitingProcCount=" + queue.size();
}
}

View File

@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ public interface LockStatus {
boolean isLockOwner(long procId);
boolean hasParentLock(final Procedure proc);
boolean hasParentLock(Procedure<?> proc);
boolean hasLockAccess(final Procedure proc);
boolean hasLockAccess(Procedure<?> proc);
Procedure<?> getExclusiveLockOwnerProcedure();

View File

@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ public class MasterProcedureScheduler extends AbstractProcedureScheduler {
final String namespace = table.getNamespaceAsString();
final LockAndQueue namespaceLock = locking.getNamespaceLock(namespace);
final LockAndQueue tableLock = locking.getTableLock(table);
if (!namespaceLock.trySharedLock()) {
if (!namespaceLock.trySharedLock(procedure)) {
waitProcedure(namespaceLock, procedure);
logLockedResource(LockedResourceType.NAMESPACE, namespace);
return true;
@ -560,9 +560,7 @@ public class MasterProcedureScheduler extends AbstractProcedureScheduler {
final LockAndQueue namespaceLock = locking.getNamespaceLock(table.getNamespaceAsString());
final LockAndQueue tableLock = locking.getTableLock(table);
int waitingCount = 0;
if (!tableLock.hasParentLock(procedure)) {
tableLock.releaseExclusiveLock(procedure);
if (tableLock.releaseExclusiveLock(procedure)) {
waitingCount += wakeWaitingProcedures(tableLock);
}
if (namespaceLock.releaseSharedLock()) {
@ -591,12 +589,12 @@ public class MasterProcedureScheduler extends AbstractProcedureScheduler {
try {
final LockAndQueue namespaceLock = locking.getNamespaceLock(table.getNamespaceAsString());
final LockAndQueue tableLock = locking.getTableLock(table);
if (!namespaceLock.trySharedLock()) {
if (!namespaceLock.trySharedLock(procedure)) {
waitProcedure(namespaceLock, procedure);
return null;
}
if (!tableLock.trySharedLock()) {
if (!tableLock.trySharedLock(procedure)) {
namespaceLock.releaseSharedLock();
waitProcedure(tableLock, procedure);
return null;
@ -690,11 +688,9 @@ public class MasterProcedureScheduler extends AbstractProcedureScheduler {
Arrays.sort(regionInfo, RegionInfo.COMPARATOR);
schedLock();
try {
// If there is parent procedure, it would have already taken xlock, so no need to take
// shared lock here. Otherwise, take shared lock.
if (!procedure.hasParent()
&& waitTableQueueSharedLock(procedure, table) == null) {
return true;
assert table != null;
if (waitTableSharedLock(procedure, table)) {
return true;
}
// acquire region xlocks or wait
@ -702,7 +698,6 @@ public class MasterProcedureScheduler extends AbstractProcedureScheduler {
final LockAndQueue[] regionLocks = new LockAndQueue[regionInfo.length];
for (int i = 0; i < regionInfo.length; ++i) {
LOG.info("{} checking lock on {}", procedure, regionInfo[i].getEncodedName());
assert table != null;
assert regionInfo[i] != null;
assert regionInfo[i].getTable() != null;
assert regionInfo[i].getTable().equals(table): regionInfo[i] + " " + procedure;
@ -719,7 +714,7 @@ public class MasterProcedureScheduler extends AbstractProcedureScheduler {
}
}
if (!hasLock && !procedure.hasParent()) {
if (!hasLock) {
wakeTableSharedLock(procedure, table);
}
return !hasLock;
@ -748,14 +743,14 @@ public class MasterProcedureScheduler extends AbstractProcedureScheduler {
schedLock();
try {
int numProcs = 0;
final Procedure[] nextProcs = new Procedure[regionInfo.length];
final Procedure<?>[] nextProcs = new Procedure[regionInfo.length];
for (int i = 0; i < regionInfo.length; ++i) {
assert regionInfo[i].getTable().equals(table);
assert i == 0 || regionInfo[i] != regionInfo[i - 1] : "duplicate region: " + regionInfo[i];
LockAndQueue regionLock = locking.getRegionLock(regionInfo[i].getEncodedName());
if (regionLock.releaseExclusiveLock(procedure)) {
if (!regionLock.isEmpty()) {
if (!regionLock.isWaitingQueueEmpty()) {
// release one procedure at the time since regions has an xlock
nextProcs[numProcs++] = regionLock.removeFirst();
} else {
@ -769,11 +764,8 @@ public class MasterProcedureScheduler extends AbstractProcedureScheduler {
wakeProcedure(nextProcs[i]);
}
wakePollIfNeeded(numProcs);
if (!procedure.hasParent()) {
// release the table shared-lock.
// (if we have a parent, it is holding an xlock so we didn't take the shared-lock)
wakeTableSharedLock(procedure, table);
}
// release the table shared-lock.
wakeTableSharedLock(procedure, table);
} finally {
schedUnlock();
}
@ -789,15 +781,15 @@ public class MasterProcedureScheduler extends AbstractProcedureScheduler {
* @param namespace Namespace to lock
* @return true if the procedure has to wait for the namespace to be available
*/
public boolean waitNamespaceExclusiveLock(final Procedure<?> procedure, final String namespace) {
public boolean waitNamespaceExclusiveLock(Procedure<?> procedure, String namespace) {
schedLock();
try {
final LockAndQueue systemNamespaceTableLock =
locking.getTableLock(TableName.NAMESPACE_TABLE_NAME);
if (!systemNamespaceTableLock.trySharedLock()) {
locking.getTableLock(TableName.NAMESPACE_TABLE_NAME);
if (!systemNamespaceTableLock.trySharedLock(procedure)) {
waitProcedure(systemNamespaceTableLock, procedure);
logLockedResource(LockedResourceType.TABLE,
TableName.NAMESPACE_TABLE_NAME.getNameAsString());
TableName.NAMESPACE_TABLE_NAME.getNameAsString());
return true;
}
@ -826,13 +818,14 @@ public class MasterProcedureScheduler extends AbstractProcedureScheduler {
final LockAndQueue namespaceLock = locking.getNamespaceLock(namespace);
final LockAndQueue systemNamespaceTableLock =
locking.getTableLock(TableName.NAMESPACE_TABLE_NAME);
namespaceLock.releaseExclusiveLock(procedure);
int waitingCount = 0;
if (namespaceLock.releaseExclusiveLock(procedure)) {
waitingCount += wakeWaitingProcedures(namespaceLock);
}
if (systemNamespaceTableLock.releaseSharedLock()) {
addToRunQueue(tableRunQueue, getTableQueue(TableName.NAMESPACE_TABLE_NAME));
waitingCount += wakeWaitingProcedures(systemNamespaceTableLock);
}
waitingCount += wakeWaitingProcedures(namespaceLock);
wakePollIfNeeded(waitingCount);
} finally {
schedUnlock();
@ -878,6 +871,7 @@ public class MasterProcedureScheduler extends AbstractProcedureScheduler {
schedLock();
try {
final LockAndQueue lock = locking.getServerLock(serverName);
// Only SCP will acquire/release server lock so do not need to check the return value here.
lock.releaseExclusiveLock(procedure);
// We do not need to create a new queue so just pass null, as in tests we may pass procedures
// other than ServerProcedureInterface
@ -929,10 +923,11 @@ public class MasterProcedureScheduler extends AbstractProcedureScheduler {
schedLock();
try {
final LockAndQueue lock = locking.getPeerLock(peerId);
lock.releaseExclusiveLock(procedure);
addToRunQueue(peerRunQueue, getPeerQueue(peerId));
int waitingCount = wakeWaitingProcedures(lock);
wakePollIfNeeded(waitingCount);
if (lock.releaseExclusiveLock(procedure)) {
addToRunQueue(peerRunQueue, getPeerQueue(peerId));
int waitingCount = wakeWaitingProcedures(lock);
wakePollIfNeeded(waitingCount);
}
} finally {
schedUnlock();
}

View File

@ -125,13 +125,8 @@ class SchemaLocking {
List<Procedure<?>> waitingProcedures = new ArrayList<>();
for (Procedure<?> procedure : queue) {
if (!(procedure instanceof LockProcedure)) {
continue;
}
waitingProcedures.add(procedure);
}
queue.filterWaitingQueue(p -> p instanceof LockProcedure)
.forEachOrdered(waitingProcedures::add);
return new LockedResource(resourceType, resourceName, lockType, exclusiveLockOwnerProcedure,
sharedLockCount, waitingProcedures);

View File

@ -95,9 +95,9 @@ public class TestAdmin2 {
TEST_UTIL.getConfiguration().setInt("hbase.regionserver.msginterval", 100);
TEST_UTIL.getConfiguration().setInt("hbase.client.pause", 250);
TEST_UTIL.getConfiguration().setInt("hbase.client.retries.number", 6);
TEST_UTIL.getConfiguration().setInt("hbase.regionserver.metahandler.count", 30);
TEST_UTIL.getConfiguration().setBoolean(
"hbase.master.enabletable.roundrobin", true);
TEST_UTIL.getConfiguration().setInt(HConstants.REGION_SERVER_HIGH_PRIORITY_HANDLER_COUNT, 30);
TEST_UTIL.getConfiguration().setInt(HConstants.REGION_SERVER_HANDLER_COUNT, 30);
TEST_UTIL.getConfiguration().setBoolean("hbase.master.enabletable.roundrobin", true);
TEST_UTIL.startMiniCluster(3);
}

View File

@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ package org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.procedure;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertFalse;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertNull;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertSame;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
import java.io.IOException;
@ -31,7 +32,10 @@ import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.HBaseClassTestRule;
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.HRegionInfo;
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ServerName;
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TableName;
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.RegionInfo;
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.RegionInfoBuilder;
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.locking.LockProcedure;
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.procedure.TableProcedureInterface.TableOperationType;
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure2.LockType;
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure2.LockedResource;
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure2.LockedResourceType;
@ -839,29 +843,29 @@ public class TestMasterProcedureScheduler {
}
public static class TestRegionProcedure extends TestTableProcedure {
private final HRegionInfo[] regionInfo;
private final RegionInfo[] regionInfo;
public TestRegionProcedure() {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("recovery should not be triggered here");
}
public TestRegionProcedure(long procId, TableName tableName, TableOperationType opType,
HRegionInfo... regionInfo) {
RegionInfo... regionInfo) {
this(-1, procId, tableName, opType, regionInfo);
}
public TestRegionProcedure(long parentProcId, long procId, TableName tableName,
TableOperationType opType, HRegionInfo... regionInfo) {
TableOperationType opType, RegionInfo... regionInfo) {
this(-1, parentProcId, procId, tableName, opType, regionInfo);
}
public TestRegionProcedure(long rootProcId, long parentProcId, long procId, TableName tableName,
TableOperationType opType, HRegionInfo... regionInfo) {
TableOperationType opType, RegionInfo... regionInfo) {
super(rootProcId, parentProcId, procId, tableName, opType);
this.regionInfo = regionInfo;
}
public HRegionInfo[] getRegionInfo() {
public RegionInfo[] getRegionInfo() {
return regionInfo;
}
@ -1114,5 +1118,30 @@ public class TestMasterProcedureScheduler {
assertEquals(LockType.EXCLUSIVE, waitingProcedure3.getType());
assertEquals(procedure3, waitingProcedure3);
}
@Test
public void testAcquireSharedLockWhileParentHoldingExclusiveLock() {
TableName tableName = TableName.valueOf(name.getMethodName());
RegionInfo regionInfo = RegionInfoBuilder.newBuilder(tableName).build();
TestTableProcedure parentProc = new TestTableProcedure(1, tableName, TableOperationType.EDIT);
TestRegionProcedure proc =
new TestRegionProcedure(1, 2, tableName, TableOperationType.REGION_EDIT, regionInfo);
queue.addBack(parentProc);
assertSame(parentProc, queue.poll());
assertFalse(queue.waitTableExclusiveLock(parentProc, tableName));
// The queue for this table should be added back to run queue as the parent has the xlock, so we
// can poll it out.
queue.addBack(proc);
assertSame(proc, queue.poll());
// the parent has xlock on the table, and it is OK for us to acquire shared lock on the table,
// this is what this test wants to confirm
assertFalse(queue.waitRegion(proc, regionInfo));
queue.wakeRegion(proc, regionInfo);
queue.wakeTableExclusiveLock(parentProc, tableName);
}
}