HBASE-21062 Correctly use the defaultProvider value on the Providers enum when constructing a WALProvider
This commit is contained in:
parent
092efb4274
commit
4d7ed0f94c
|
@ -119,22 +119,32 @@ public class WALFactory {
|
|||
factoryId = SINGLETON_ID;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@VisibleForTesting
|
||||
Providers getDefaultProvider() {
|
||||
return Providers.defaultProvider;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@VisibleForTesting
|
||||
public Class<? extends WALProvider> getProviderClass(String key, String defaultValue) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
Providers provider = Providers.valueOf(conf.get(key, defaultValue));
|
||||
if (provider != Providers.defaultProvider) {
|
||||
// User gives a wal provider explicitly, just use that one
|
||||
return provider.clazz;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// AsyncFSWAL has better performance in most cases, and also uses less resources, we will try
|
||||
// to use it if possible. But it deeply hacks into the internal of DFSClient so will be easily
|
||||
// broken when upgrading hadoop. If it is broken, then we fall back to use FSHLog.
|
||||
if (AsyncFSWALProvider.load()) {
|
||||
return AsyncFSWALProvider.class;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
||||
// AsyncFSWALProvider is not guaranteed to work on all Hadoop versions, when it's chosen as
|
||||
// the default and we can't us it, we want to fall back to FSHLog which we know works on
|
||||
// all versions.
|
||||
if (provider == getDefaultProvider() && provider.clazz == AsyncFSWALProvider.class
|
||||
&& !AsyncFSWALProvider.load()) {
|
||||
// AsyncFSWAL has better performance in most cases, and also uses less resources, we will
|
||||
// try to use it if possible. It deeply hacks into the internal of DFSClient so will be
|
||||
// easily broken when upgrading hadoop.
|
||||
LOG.warn("Failed to load AsyncFSWALProvider, falling back to FSHLogProvider");
|
||||
return FSHLogProvider.class;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// N.b. If the user specifically requested AsyncFSWALProvider but their environment doesn't
|
||||
// support using it (e.g. AsyncFSWALProvider.load() == false), we should let this fail and
|
||||
// not fall back to FSHLogProvider.
|
||||
return provider.clazz;
|
||||
} catch (IllegalArgumentException exception) {
|
||||
// Fall back to them specifying a class name
|
||||
// Note that the passed default class shouldn't actually be used, since the above only fails
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Bytes;
|
|||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CommonFSUtils;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.FSUtils;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Threads;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.wal.WALFactory.Providers;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.MiniDFSCluster;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.protocol.HdfsConstants;
|
||||
|
@ -719,4 +720,26 @@ public class TestWALFactory {
|
|||
assertEquals(WALFactory.Providers.asyncfs.clazz, walFactory.getMetaProvider().getClass());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testDefaultProvider() throws IOException {
|
||||
final Configuration conf = new Configuration();
|
||||
// AsyncFSWal is the default, we should be able to request any WAL.
|
||||
final WALFactory normalWalFactory = new WALFactory(conf, this.currentServername.toString());
|
||||
Class<? extends WALProvider> fshLogProvider = normalWalFactory.getProviderClass(
|
||||
WALFactory.WAL_PROVIDER, Providers.filesystem.name());
|
||||
assertEquals(Providers.filesystem.clazz, fshLogProvider);
|
||||
|
||||
// Imagine a world where MultiWAL is the default
|
||||
final WALFactory customizedWalFactory = new WALFactory(
|
||||
conf, this.currentServername.toString()) {
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
Providers getDefaultProvider() {
|
||||
return Providers.multiwal;
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
// If we don't specify a WALProvider, we should get the default implementation.
|
||||
Class<? extends WALProvider> multiwalProviderClass = customizedWalFactory.getProviderClass(
|
||||
WALFactory.WAL_PROVIDER, Providers.multiwal.name());
|
||||
assertEquals(Providers.multiwal.clazz, multiwalProviderClass);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue