HBASE-22882 TestFlushSnapshotFromClient#testConcurrentSnapshottingAttempts is flakey (was written flakey)

This commit is contained in:
stack 2019-08-19 12:57:12 -07:00
parent 0b3db5099c
commit 8e488ce9ef
2 changed files with 13 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ import java.util.concurrent.SynchronousQueue;
import java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import org.apache.hbase.thirdparty.com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting;
import org.apache.yetus.audience.InterfaceAudience;
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
@ -67,9 +68,9 @@ public class ProcedureCoordinator {
* The rpc object registers the ProcedureCoordinator and starts any threads in this
* constructor.
*
* @param rpcs
* @param pool Used for executing procedures.
*/
@VisibleForTesting // Only used in tests. SimpleMasterProcedureManager is a test class.
public ProcedureCoordinator(ProcedureCoordinatorRpcs rpcs, ThreadPoolExecutor pool) {
this(rpcs, pool, TIMEOUT_MILLIS_DEFAULT, WAKE_MILLIS_DEFAULT);
}
@ -80,9 +81,7 @@ public class ProcedureCoordinator {
* The rpc object registers the ProcedureCoordinator and starts any threads in
* this constructor.
*
* @param rpcs
* @param pool Used for executing procedures.
* @param timeoutMillis
*/
public ProcedureCoordinator(ProcedureCoordinatorRpcs rpcs, ThreadPoolExecutor pool,
long timeoutMillis, long wakeTimeMillis) {

View File

@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ import org.junit.AfterClass;
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.BeforeClass;
import org.junit.ClassRule;
import org.junit.Ignore;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.experimental.categories.Category;
import org.slf4j.Logger;
@ -142,7 +143,6 @@ public class TestFlushSnapshotFromClient {
/**
* Test simple flush snapshotting a table that is online
* @throws Exception
*/
@Test
public void testFlushTableSnapshot() throws Exception {
@ -175,7 +175,6 @@ public class TestFlushSnapshotFromClient {
/**
* Test snapshotting a table that is online without flushing
* @throws Exception
*/
@Test
public void testSkipFlushTableSnapshot() throws Exception {
@ -215,7 +214,6 @@ public class TestFlushSnapshotFromClient {
/**
* Test simple flush snapshotting a table that is online
* @throws Exception
*/
@Test
public void testFlushTableSnapshotWithProcedure() throws Exception {
@ -446,13 +444,20 @@ public class TestFlushSnapshotFromClient {
/**
* Demonstrate that we reject snapshot requests if there is a snapshot already running on the
* same table currently running and that concurrent snapshots on different tables can both
* succeed concurretly.
* succeed concurrently.
*/
@Ignore // Turning this test off. It is written flakey (See original submission in HBASE-7536
// for admission). While the test ensures we run one snapshot at a time as the above comment
// describes, the second part of the comment where we are supposed to allow snapshots against
// different tables run concurrently is where there is issue. There is only one
// handler thread on the regionserver-side which means that on a second submission, the
// second request gets rejected with RejectedExecutionException. The test used to sort-of
// pass with 20 attempts but as often-as-not, fails.
@Test
public void testConcurrentSnapshottingAttempts() throws IOException, InterruptedException {
final TableName TABLE2_NAME = TableName.valueOf(TABLE_NAME + "2");
int ssNum = 20;
int ssNum = 2;
// make sure we don't fail on listing snapshots
SnapshotTestingUtils.assertNoSnapshots(admin);
// create second testing table