Revert "HBASE-15392 Single Cell Get reads two HFileBlocks M hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/ScanQueryMatcher.java moreRowsMayExistAfterCell Exploit the fact a Scan is a Get Scan. Also save compares if no non-default stopRow."
Revert mistaken commit
This reverts commit 7073f69993
.
This commit is contained in:
parent
c49d0caf53
commit
a13d6e000d
|
@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ public class CellComparator implements Comparator<Cell>, Serializable {
|
|||
/**
|
||||
* Used to compare two cells based on the column hint provided. This is specifically
|
||||
* used when we need to optimize the seeks based on the next indexed key. This is an
|
||||
* advanced usage API specifically needed for some optimizations.
|
||||
* advance usage API specifically needed for some optimizations.
|
||||
* @param nextIndexedCell the next indexed cell
|
||||
* @param currentCell the cell to be compared
|
||||
* @param foff the family offset of the currentCell
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ public class CombinedBlockCache implements ResizableBlockCache, HeapSize {
|
|||
@Override
|
||||
public void cacheBlock(BlockCacheKey cacheKey, Cacheable buf, boolean inMemory,
|
||||
final boolean cacheDataInL1) {
|
||||
boolean metaBlock = buf.getBlockType().getCategory() != BlockCategory.DATA;
|
||||
if (metaBlock || cacheDataInL1) {
|
||||
boolean isMetaBlock = buf.getBlockType().getCategory() != BlockCategory.DATA;
|
||||
if (isMetaBlock || cacheDataInL1) {
|
||||
lruCache.cacheBlock(cacheKey, buf, inMemory, cacheDataInL1);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
l2Cache.cacheBlock(cacheKey, buf, inMemory, false);
|
||||
|
@ -81,9 +81,12 @@ public class CombinedBlockCache implements ResizableBlockCache, HeapSize {
|
|||
boolean repeat, boolean updateCacheMetrics) {
|
||||
// TODO: is there a hole here, or just awkwardness since in the lruCache getBlock
|
||||
// we end up calling l2Cache.getBlock.
|
||||
return lruCache.containsBlock(cacheKey)?
|
||||
lruCache.getBlock(cacheKey, caching, repeat, updateCacheMetrics):
|
||||
l2Cache.getBlock(cacheKey, caching, repeat, updateCacheMetrics);
|
||||
if (lruCache.containsBlock(cacheKey)) {
|
||||
return lruCache.getBlock(cacheKey, caching, repeat, updateCacheMetrics);
|
||||
}
|
||||
Cacheable result = l2Cache.getBlock(cacheKey, caching, repeat, updateCacheMetrics);
|
||||
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ public class HFileWriterImpl implements HFile.Writer {
|
|||
// No opportunity for optimization. Just return right key.
|
||||
return right;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @param leftArray
|
||||
* @param leftOffset
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -29,9 +29,6 @@ import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.Scan;
|
|||
* Scanner that returns the next KeyValue.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@InterfaceAudience.Private
|
||||
// TODO: Change name from KeyValueScanner to CellScanner only we already have a simple CellScanner
|
||||
// so this should be something else altogether, a decoration on our base CellScanner. TODO.
|
||||
// This class shows in CPs so do it all in one swell swoop. HBase-2.0.0.
|
||||
public interface KeyValueScanner extends Shipper {
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* The byte array represents for NO_NEXT_INDEXED_KEY;
|
||||
|
@ -164,9 +161,8 @@ public interface KeyValueScanner extends Shipper {
|
|||
public boolean seekToLastRow() throws IOException;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @return the next key in the index, usually the first key of next block OR a key that falls
|
||||
* between last key of current block and first key of next block..
|
||||
* see HFileWriterImpl#getMidpoint, or null if not known.
|
||||
* @return the next key in the index (the key to seek to the next block)
|
||||
* if known, or null otherwise
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public Cell getNextIndexedKey();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ public class ScanQueryMatcher {
|
|||
/* row is not private for tests */
|
||||
/** Row the query is on */
|
||||
Cell curCell;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Oldest put in any of the involved store files
|
||||
* Used to decide whether it is ok to delete
|
||||
|
@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ public class ScanQueryMatcher {
|
|||
* first column.
|
||||
* */
|
||||
private boolean hasNullColumn = true;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
private RegionCoprocessorHost regionCoprocessorHost= null;
|
||||
|
||||
// By default, when hbase.hstore.time.to.purge.deletes is 0ms, a delete
|
||||
|
@ -140,22 +140,22 @@ public class ScanQueryMatcher {
|
|||
// currently influencing. This is because Puts, that this delete can
|
||||
// influence. may appear out of order.
|
||||
private final long timeToPurgeDeletes;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
private final boolean isUserScan;
|
||||
|
||||
private final boolean isReversed;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* True if we are doing a 'Get' Scan. Every Get is actually a one-row Scan.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private final boolean get;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Construct a QueryMatcher for a scan
|
||||
* @param scan
|
||||
* @param scanInfo The store's immutable scan info
|
||||
* @param columns
|
||||
* @param scanType Type of the scan
|
||||
* @param earliestPutTs Earliest put seen in any of the store files.
|
||||
* @param oldestUnexpiredTS the oldest timestamp we are interested in, based on TTL
|
||||
* @param oldestUnexpiredTS the oldest timestamp we are interested in,
|
||||
* based on TTL
|
||||
* @param regionCoprocessorHost
|
||||
* @throws IOException
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public ScanQueryMatcher(Scan scan, ScanInfo scanInfo, NavigableSet<byte[]> columns,
|
||||
ScanType scanType, long readPointToUse, long earliestPutTs, long oldestUnexpiredTS,
|
||||
|
@ -166,7 +166,6 @@ public class ScanQueryMatcher {
|
|||
} else {
|
||||
this.tr = timeRange;
|
||||
}
|
||||
this.get = scan.isGetScan();
|
||||
this.rowComparator = scanInfo.getComparator();
|
||||
this.regionCoprocessorHost = regionCoprocessorHost;
|
||||
this.deletes = instantiateDeleteTracker();
|
||||
|
@ -235,8 +234,8 @@ public class ScanQueryMatcher {
|
|||
* @param now the current server time
|
||||
* @param dropDeletesFromRow The inclusive left bound of the range; can be EMPTY_START_ROW.
|
||||
* @param dropDeletesToRow The exclusive right bound of the range; can be EMPTY_END_ROW.
|
||||
* @param regionCoprocessorHost
|
||||
* @throws IOException
|
||||
* @param regionCoprocessorHost
|
||||
* @throws IOException
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public ScanQueryMatcher(Scan scan, ScanInfo scanInfo, NavigableSet<byte[]> columns,
|
||||
long readPointToUse, long earliestPutTs, long oldestUnexpiredTS, long now,
|
||||
|
@ -281,7 +280,7 @@ public class ScanQueryMatcher {
|
|||
* caused by a data corruption.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public MatchCode match(Cell cell) throws IOException {
|
||||
if (filter != null && filter.filterAllRemaining()) {
|
||||
if (filter != null && filter.filterAllRemaining()) {
|
||||
return MatchCode.DONE_SCAN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (curCell != null) {
|
||||
|
@ -325,7 +324,7 @@ public class ScanQueryMatcher {
|
|||
// check if the cell is expired by cell TTL
|
||||
if (HStore.isCellTTLExpired(cell, this.oldestUnexpiredTS, this.now)) {
|
||||
return MatchCode.SKIP;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The delete logic is pretty complicated now.
|
||||
|
@ -360,10 +359,10 @@ public class ScanQueryMatcher {
|
|||
}
|
||||
// Can't early out now, because DelFam come before any other keys
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if ((!isUserScan)
|
||||
&& timeToPurgeDeletes > 0
|
||||
&& (EnvironmentEdgeManager.currentTime() - timestamp)
|
||||
&& (EnvironmentEdgeManager.currentTime() - timestamp)
|
||||
<= timeToPurgeDeletes) {
|
||||
return MatchCode.INCLUDE;
|
||||
} else if (retainDeletesInOutput || mvccVersion > maxReadPointToTrackVersions) {
|
||||
|
@ -504,27 +503,22 @@ public class ScanQueryMatcher {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @return Returns false if we know there are no more rows to be scanned (We've reached the
|
||||
* <code>stopRow</code> or we are scanning on row only because this Scan is for a Get, etc.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public boolean moreRowsMayExistAfter(Cell kv) {
|
||||
// If a 'get' Scan -- we are doing a Get (every Get is a single-row Scan in implementation) --
|
||||
// then we are looking at one row only, the one specified in the Get coordinate..so we know
|
||||
// for sure that there are no more rows on this Scan
|
||||
if (this.get) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
if (this.isReversed) {
|
||||
if (rowComparator.compareRows(kv, stopRow, 0, stopRow.length) <= 0) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// If no stopRow, return that there may be more rows. The tests that follow depend on a
|
||||
// non-empty, non-default stopRow so this little test below short-circuits out doing the
|
||||
// following compares.
|
||||
if (this.stopRow == null || this.stopRow == HConstants.EMPTY_BYTE_ARRAY) {
|
||||
if (!Bytes.equals(stopRow , HConstants.EMPTY_END_ROW) &&
|
||||
rowComparator.compareRows(kv, stopRow, 0, stopRow.length) >= 0) {
|
||||
// KV >= STOPROW
|
||||
// then NO there is nothing left.
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return this.isReversed?
|
||||
rowComparator.compareRows(kv, stopRow, 0, stopRow.length) > 0:
|
||||
Bytes.equals(stopRow, HConstants.EMPTY_END_ROW) ||
|
||||
rowComparator.compareRows(kv, stopRow, 0, stopRow.length) < 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ public class StoreScanner extends NonReversedNonLazyKeyValueScanner
|
|||
protected List<KeyValueScanner> currentScanners = new ArrayList<KeyValueScanner>();
|
||||
// flush update lock
|
||||
private ReentrantLock flushLock = new ReentrantLock();
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
protected final long readPt;
|
||||
|
||||
// used by the injection framework to test race between StoreScanner construction and compaction
|
||||
|
@ -600,12 +600,6 @@ public class StoreScanner extends NonReversedNonLazyKeyValueScanner
|
|||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
case DONE:
|
||||
// Optimization for Gets! If DONE, no more to get on this row, early exit!
|
||||
if (this.scan.isGetScan()) {
|
||||
// Then no more to this row... exit.
|
||||
close(false);// Do all cleanup except heap.close()
|
||||
return scannerContext.setScannerState(NextState.NO_MORE_VALUES).hasMoreValues();
|
||||
}
|
||||
matcher.curCell = null;
|
||||
return scannerContext.setScannerState(NextState.MORE_VALUES).hasMoreValues();
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -655,67 +649,18 @@ public class StoreScanner extends NonReversedNonLazyKeyValueScanner
|
|||
return scannerContext.setScannerState(NextState.NO_MORE_VALUES).hasMoreValues();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* See if we should actually SEEK or rather just SKIP to the next Cell (see HBASE-13109).
|
||||
* This method works together with ColumnTrackers and Filters. ColumnTrackers may issue SEEK
|
||||
* hints, such as seek to next column, next row, or seek to an arbitrary seek key.
|
||||
* This method intercepts these qcodes and decides whether a seek is the most efficient _actual_
|
||||
* way to get us to the requested cell (SEEKs are more expensive than SKIP, SKIP, SKIP inside the
|
||||
* current, loaded block).
|
||||
* It does this by looking at the next indexed key of the current HFile. This key
|
||||
* is then compared with the _SEEK_ key, where a SEEK key is an artificial 'last possible key
|
||||
* on the row' (only in here, we avoid actually creating a SEEK key; in the compare we work with
|
||||
* the current Cell but compare as though it were a seek key; see down in
|
||||
* matcher.compareKeyForNextRow, etc). If the compare gets us onto the
|
||||
* next block we *_SEEK, otherwise we just INCLUDE or SKIP, and let the ColumnTrackers or Filters
|
||||
* go through the next Cell, and so on)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* <p>The ColumnTrackers and Filters must behave correctly in all cases, i.e. if they are past the
|
||||
* Cells they care about they must issues a SKIP or SEEK.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* <p>Other notes:
|
||||
* <ul>
|
||||
* <li>Rows can straddle block boundaries</li>
|
||||
* <li>Versions of columns can straddle block boundaries (i.e. column C1 at T1 might be in a
|
||||
* different block than column C1 at T2)</li>
|
||||
* <li>We want to SKIP and INCLUDE if the chance is high that we'll find the desired Cell after a
|
||||
* few SKIPs...</li>
|
||||
* <li>We want to INCLUDE_AND_SEEK and SEEK when the chance is high that we'll be able to seek
|
||||
* past many Cells, especially if we know we need to go to the next block.</li>
|
||||
* </ul>
|
||||
* <p>A good proxy (best effort) to determine whether INCLUDE/SKIP is better than SEEK is whether
|
||||
* we'll likely end up seeking to the next block (or past the next block) to get our next column.
|
||||
* Example:
|
||||
* <pre>
|
||||
* | BLOCK 1 | BLOCK 2 |
|
||||
* | r1/c1, r1/c2, r1/c3 | r1/c4, r1/c5, r2/c1 |
|
||||
* ^ ^
|
||||
* | |
|
||||
* Next Index Key SEEK_NEXT_ROW (before r2/c1)
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* | BLOCK 1 | BLOCK 2 |
|
||||
* | r1/c1/t5, r1/c1/t4, r1/c1/t3 | r1/c1/t2, r1/c1/T1, r1/c2/T3 |
|
||||
* ^ ^
|
||||
* | |
|
||||
* Next Index Key SEEK_NEXT_COL
|
||||
* </pre>
|
||||
* Now imagine we want columns c1 and c3 (see first diagram above), the 'Next Index Key' of r1/c4
|
||||
* is > r1/c3 so we should seek to get to the c1 on the next row, r2. In second case, say we only
|
||||
* want one version of c1, after we have it, a SEEK_COL will be issued to get to c2. Looking at
|
||||
* the 'Next Index Key', it would land us in the next block, so we should SEEK. In other scenarios
|
||||
* where the SEEK will not land us in the next block, it is very likely better to issues a series
|
||||
* of SKIPs.
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* See if we should actually SEEK or rather just SKIP to the next Cell.
|
||||
* (see HBASE-13109)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@VisibleForTesting
|
||||
protected ScanQueryMatcher.MatchCode optimize(ScanQueryMatcher.MatchCode qcode, Cell cell) {
|
||||
private ScanQueryMatcher.MatchCode optimize(ScanQueryMatcher.MatchCode qcode, Cell cell) {
|
||||
switch(qcode) {
|
||||
case INCLUDE_AND_SEEK_NEXT_COL:
|
||||
case SEEK_NEXT_COL:
|
||||
{
|
||||
Cell nextIndexedKey = getNextIndexedKey();
|
||||
if (nextIndexedKey != null && nextIndexedKey != KeyValueScanner.NO_NEXT_INDEXED_KEY
|
||||
&& matcher.compareKeyForNextColumn(nextIndexedKey, cell) > 0) {
|
||||
&& matcher.compareKeyForNextColumn(nextIndexedKey, cell) >= 0) {
|
||||
return qcode == MatchCode.SEEK_NEXT_COL ? MatchCode.SKIP : MatchCode.INCLUDE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
@ -723,16 +668,10 @@ public class StoreScanner extends NonReversedNonLazyKeyValueScanner
|
|||
case INCLUDE_AND_SEEK_NEXT_ROW:
|
||||
case SEEK_NEXT_ROW:
|
||||
{
|
||||
// If it is a Get Scan, then we know that we are done with this row; there are no more
|
||||
// rows beyond the current one: don't try to optimize. We are DONE. Return the *_NEXT_ROW
|
||||
// qcode as is. When the caller gets these flags on a Get Scan, it knows it can shut down the
|
||||
// Scan.
|
||||
if (!this.scan.isGetScan()) {
|
||||
Cell nextIndexedKey = getNextIndexedKey();
|
||||
if (nextIndexedKey != null && nextIndexedKey != KeyValueScanner.NO_NEXT_INDEXED_KEY
|
||||
&& matcher.compareKeyForNextRow(nextIndexedKey, cell) > 0) {
|
||||
return qcode == MatchCode.SEEK_NEXT_ROW ? MatchCode.SKIP : MatchCode.INCLUDE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
Cell nextIndexedKey = getNextIndexedKey();
|
||||
if (nextIndexedKey != null && nextIndexedKey != KeyValueScanner.NO_NEXT_INDEXED_KEY
|
||||
&& matcher.compareKeyForNextRow(nextIndexedKey, cell) >= 0) {
|
||||
return qcode == MatchCode.SEEK_NEXT_ROW ? MatchCode.SKIP : MatchCode.INCLUDE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -870,10 +809,10 @@ public class StoreScanner extends NonReversedNonLazyKeyValueScanner
|
|||
// check the var without any lock. Suppose even if we see the old
|
||||
// value here still it is ok to continue because we will not be resetting
|
||||
// the heap but will continue with the referenced memstore's snapshot. For compactions
|
||||
// any way we don't need the updateReaders at all to happen as we still continue with
|
||||
// any way we don't need the updateReaders at all to happen as we still continue with
|
||||
// the older files
|
||||
if (flushed) {
|
||||
// If there is a flush and the current scan is notified on the flush ensure that the
|
||||
// If there is a flush and the current scan is notified on the flush ensure that the
|
||||
// scan's heap gets reset and we do a seek on the newly flushed file.
|
||||
if(!this.closing) {
|
||||
this.lastTop = this.peek();
|
||||
|
@ -903,7 +842,7 @@ public class StoreScanner extends NonReversedNonLazyKeyValueScanner
|
|||
if (scanners.isEmpty()) return;
|
||||
int storeFileScannerCount = scanners.size();
|
||||
CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(storeFileScannerCount);
|
||||
List<ParallelSeekHandler> handlers =
|
||||
List<ParallelSeekHandler> handlers =
|
||||
new ArrayList<ParallelSeekHandler>(storeFileScannerCount);
|
||||
for (KeyValueScanner scanner : scanners) {
|
||||
if (scanner instanceof StoreFileScanner) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -30,7 +30,8 @@ import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.CellComparator;
|
|||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.NonReversedNonLazyKeyValueScanner;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Utility scanner that wraps a sortable collection and serves as a KeyValueScanner.
|
||||
* Utility scanner that wraps a sortable collection and serves
|
||||
* as a KeyValueScanner.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@InterfaceAudience.Private
|
||||
public class CollectionBackedScanner extends NonReversedNonLazyKeyValueScanner {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ package org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver;
|
|||
import java.util.ArrayList;
|
||||
import java.util.List;
|
||||
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.Cell;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.CellComparator;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.KeyValue;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CollectionBackedScanner;
|
||||
|
@ -34,8 +33,9 @@ import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CollectionBackedScanner;
|
|||
* to be a store file scanner.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public class KeyValueScanFixture extends CollectionBackedScanner {
|
||||
public KeyValueScanFixture(CellComparator comparator, Cell... cells) {
|
||||
super(comparator, cells);
|
||||
public KeyValueScanFixture(CellComparator comparator,
|
||||
KeyValue... incData) {
|
||||
super(comparator, incData);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public static List<KeyValueScanner> scanFixture(KeyValue[] ... kvArrays) {
|
||||
|
@ -45,4 +45,4 @@ public class KeyValueScanFixture extends CollectionBackedScanner {
|
|||
}
|
||||
return scanners;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ public class TestKeyValueScanFixture extends TestCase {
|
|||
KeyValueTestUtil.create("RowB", "family", "qf1",
|
||||
10, KeyValue.Type.Put, "value-10")
|
||||
};
|
||||
KeyValueScanner scan = new KeyValueScanFixture(CellComparator.COMPARATOR, kvs);
|
||||
KeyValueScanner scan = new KeyValueScanFixture(
|
||||
CellComparator.COMPARATOR, kvs);
|
||||
|
||||
KeyValue kv = KeyValueUtil.createFirstOnRow(Bytes.toBytes("RowA"));
|
||||
// should seek to this:
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
|
|||
package org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver;
|
||||
|
||||
import static org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.KeyValueScanFixture.scanFixture;
|
||||
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
|
||||
|
||||
import java.io.IOException;
|
||||
import java.util.ArrayList;
|
||||
|
@ -28,21 +27,16 @@ import java.util.Arrays;
|
|||
import java.util.List;
|
||||
import java.util.NavigableSet;
|
||||
import java.util.TreeSet;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
|
||||
|
||||
import org.apache.commons.logging.Log;
|
||||
import org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.CategoryBasedTimeout;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.Cell;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.CellComparator;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.CellUtil;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.HBaseConfiguration;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.HConstants;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.KeepDeletedCells;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.KeyValue;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.KeyValueTestUtil;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.Get;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.Scan;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.testclassification.MediumTests;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.testclassification.RegionServerTests;
|
||||
|
@ -59,113 +53,16 @@ import org.junit.rules.TestRule;
|
|||
// Can't be small as it plays with EnvironmentEdgeManager
|
||||
@Category({RegionServerTests.class, MediumTests.class})
|
||||
public class TestStoreScanner {
|
||||
private static final Log LOG = LogFactory.getLog(TestStoreScanner.class);
|
||||
@Rule public TestName name = new TestName();
|
||||
@Rule public final TestRule timeout = CategoryBasedTimeout.builder().withTimeout(this.getClass()).
|
||||
withLookingForStuckThread(true).build();
|
||||
private static final String CF_STR = "cf";
|
||||
private static final byte [] CF = Bytes.toBytes(CF_STR);
|
||||
final byte [] CF = Bytes.toBytes(CF_STR);
|
||||
static Configuration CONF = HBaseConfiguration.create();
|
||||
private ScanInfo scanInfo = new ScanInfo(CONF, CF, 0, Integer.MAX_VALUE,
|
||||
Long.MAX_VALUE, KeepDeletedCells.FALSE, 0, CellComparator.COMPARATOR);
|
||||
private ScanType scanType = ScanType.USER_SCAN;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* From here on down, we have a bunch of defines and specific CELL_GRID of Cells. The
|
||||
* CELL_GRID then has a Scanner that can fake out 'block' transitions. All this elaborate
|
||||
* setup is for tests that ensure we don't overread, and that the
|
||||
* {@link StoreScanner#optimize(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.ScanQueryMatcher.MatchCode,
|
||||
* Cell)} is not overly enthusiastic.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private static final byte [] ZERO = new byte [] {'0'};
|
||||
private static final byte [] ZERO_POINT_ZERO = new byte [] {'0', '.', '0'};
|
||||
private static final byte [] ONE = new byte [] {'1'};
|
||||
private static final byte [] TWO = new byte [] {'2'};
|
||||
private static final byte [] TWO_POINT_TWO = new byte [] {'2', '.', '2'};
|
||||
private static final byte [] THREE = new byte [] {'3'};
|
||||
private static final byte [] FOUR = new byte [] {'4'};
|
||||
private static final byte [] FIVE = new byte [] {'5'};
|
||||
private static final byte [] VALUE = new byte [] {'v'};
|
||||
private static final int CELL_GRID_BLOCK2_BOUNDARY = 4;
|
||||
private static final int CELL_GRID_BLOCK3_BOUNDARY = 11;
|
||||
private static final int CELL_GRID_BLOCK4_BOUNDARY = 15;
|
||||
private static final int CELL_GRID_BLOCK5_BOUNDARY = 19;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Five rows by four columns distinguished by column qualifier (column qualifier is one of the
|
||||
* four rows... ONE, TWO, etc.). Exceptions are a weird row after TWO; it is TWO_POINT_TWO.
|
||||
* And then row FOUR has five columns finishing w/ row FIVE having a single column.
|
||||
* We will use this to test scan does the right thing as it
|
||||
* we do Gets, StoreScanner#optimize, and what we do on (faked) block boundaries.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private static final Cell [] CELL_GRID = new Cell [] {
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(ONE, CF, ONE, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(ONE, CF, TWO, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(ONE, CF, THREE, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(ONE, CF, FOUR, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
// Offset 4 CELL_GRID_BLOCK2_BOUNDARY
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(TWO, CF, ONE, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(TWO, CF, TWO, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(TWO, CF, THREE, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(TWO, CF, FOUR, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(TWO_POINT_TWO, CF, ZERO, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(TWO_POINT_TWO, CF, ZERO_POINT_ZERO, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(TWO_POINT_TWO, CF, FIVE, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
// Offset 11! CELL_GRID_BLOCK3_BOUNDARY
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(THREE, CF, ONE, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(THREE, CF, TWO, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(THREE, CF, THREE, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(THREE, CF, FOUR, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
// Offset 15 CELL_GRID_BLOCK4_BOUNDARY
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(FOUR, CF, ONE, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(FOUR, CF, TWO, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(FOUR, CF, THREE, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(FOUR, CF, FOUR, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
// Offset 19 CELL_GRID_BLOCK5_BOUNDARY
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(FOUR, CF, FIVE, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
CellUtil.createCell(FIVE, CF, ZERO, 1L, KeyValue.Type.Put.getCode(), VALUE),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A StoreScanner for our CELL_GRID above. Fakes the block transitions. Does counts of
|
||||
* calls to optimize and counts of when optimize actually did an optimize.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private static class CellGridStoreScanner extends StoreScanner {
|
||||
// Count of how often optimize is called and of how often it does an optimize.
|
||||
final AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger(0);
|
||||
final AtomicInteger optimization = new AtomicInteger(0);
|
||||
|
||||
CellGridStoreScanner(final Scan scan, ScanInfo scanInfo, ScanType scanType)
|
||||
throws IOException {
|
||||
super(scan, scanInfo, scanType, scan.getFamilyMap().get(CF),
|
||||
Arrays.<KeyValueScanner>asList(
|
||||
new KeyValueScanner[] {new KeyValueScanFixture(CellComparator.COMPARATOR, CELL_GRID)}));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
protected ScanQueryMatcher.MatchCode optimize(ScanQueryMatcher.MatchCode qcode, Cell cell) {
|
||||
count.incrementAndGet();
|
||||
ScanQueryMatcher.MatchCode after = super.optimize(qcode, cell);
|
||||
LOG.info("Cell=" + cell + ", nextIndex=" + CellUtil.toString(getNextIndexedKey(), false) +
|
||||
", before=" + qcode + ", after=" + after);
|
||||
if (qcode != after) {
|
||||
optimization.incrementAndGet();
|
||||
}
|
||||
return after;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public Cell getNextIndexedKey() {
|
||||
// Fake block boundaries by having index of next block change as we go through scan.
|
||||
return count.get() > CELL_GRID_BLOCK4_BOUNDARY?
|
||||
CellUtil.createFirstOnRow(CELL_GRID[CELL_GRID_BLOCK5_BOUNDARY]):
|
||||
count.get() > CELL_GRID_BLOCK3_BOUNDARY?
|
||||
CellUtil.createFirstOnRow(CELL_GRID[CELL_GRID_BLOCK4_BOUNDARY]):
|
||||
count.get() > CELL_GRID_BLOCK2_BOUNDARY?
|
||||
CellUtil.createFirstOnRow(CELL_GRID[CELL_GRID_BLOCK3_BOUNDARY]):
|
||||
CellUtil.createFirstOnRow(CELL_GRID[CELL_GRID_BLOCK2_BOUNDARY]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Test utility for building a NavigableSet for scanners.
|
||||
* @param strCols
|
||||
|
@ -180,145 +77,6 @@ public class TestStoreScanner {
|
|||
return cols;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFullRowGetDoesNotOverreadWhenRowInsideOneBlock() throws IOException {
|
||||
// Do a Get against row two. Row two is inside a block that starts with row TWO but ends with
|
||||
// row TWO_POINT_TWO. We should read one block only.
|
||||
Get get = new Get(TWO);
|
||||
Scan scan = new Scan(get);
|
||||
CellGridStoreScanner scanner = new CellGridStoreScanner(scan, this.scanInfo, this.scanType);
|
||||
try {
|
||||
List<Cell> results = new ArrayList<Cell>();
|
||||
while (scanner.next(results)) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Should be four results of column 1 (though there are 5 rows in the CELL_GRID -- the
|
||||
// TWO_POINT_TWO row does not have a a column ONE.
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals(4, results.size());
|
||||
// We should have gone the optimize route 5 times totally... an INCLUDE for the four cells
|
||||
// in the row plus the DONE on the end.
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals(5, scanner.count.get());
|
||||
// For a full row Get, there should be no opportunity for scanner optimization.
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals(0, scanner.optimization.get());
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
scanner.close();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFullRowSpansBlocks() throws IOException {
|
||||
// Do a Get against row FOUR. It spans two blocks.
|
||||
Get get = new Get(FOUR);
|
||||
Scan scan = new Scan(get);
|
||||
CellGridStoreScanner scanner = new CellGridStoreScanner(scan, this.scanInfo, this.scanType);
|
||||
try {
|
||||
List<Cell> results = new ArrayList<Cell>();
|
||||
while (scanner.next(results)) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Should be four results of column 1 (though there are 5 rows in the CELL_GRID -- the
|
||||
// TWO_POINT_TWO row does not have a a column ONE.
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals(5, results.size());
|
||||
// We should have gone the optimize route 6 times totally... an INCLUDE for the five cells
|
||||
// in the row plus the DONE on the end.
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals(6, scanner.count.get());
|
||||
// For a full row Get, there should be no opportunity for scanner optimization.
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals(0, scanner.optimization.get());
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
scanner.close();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Test optimize in StoreScanner. Test that we skip to the next 'block' when we it makes sense
|
||||
* reading the block 'index'.
|
||||
* @throws IOException
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testOptimize() throws IOException {
|
||||
Scan scan = new Scan();
|
||||
// A scan that just gets the first qualifier on each row of the CELL_GRID
|
||||
scan.addColumn(CF, ONE);
|
||||
CellGridStoreScanner scanner = new CellGridStoreScanner(scan, this.scanInfo, this.scanType);
|
||||
try {
|
||||
List<Cell> results = new ArrayList<Cell>();
|
||||
while (scanner.next(results)) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Should be four results of column 1 (though there are 5 rows in the CELL_GRID -- the
|
||||
// TWO_POINT_TWO row does not have a a column ONE.
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals(4, results.size());
|
||||
for (Cell cell: results) {
|
||||
assertTrue(Bytes.equals(ONE, 0, ONE.length,
|
||||
cell.getQualifierArray(), cell.getQualifierOffset(), cell.getQualifierLength()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue("Optimize should do some optimizations", scanner.optimization.get() > 0);
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
scanner.close();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Ensure the optimize Scan method in StoreScanner does not get in the way of a Get doing minimum
|
||||
* work... seeking to start of block and then SKIPPING until we find the wanted Cell.
|
||||
* This 'simple' scenario mimics case of all Cells fitting inside a single HFileBlock.
|
||||
* See HBASE-15392. This test is a little cryptic. Takes a bit of staring to figure what it up to.
|
||||
* @throws IOException
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testOptimizeAndGet() throws IOException {
|
||||
// First test a Get of two columns in the row R2. Every Get is a Scan. Get columns named
|
||||
// R2 and R3.
|
||||
Get get = new Get(TWO);
|
||||
get.addColumn(CF, TWO);
|
||||
get.addColumn(CF, THREE);
|
||||
Scan scan = new Scan(get);
|
||||
CellGridStoreScanner scanner = new CellGridStoreScanner(scan, this.scanInfo, this.scanType);
|
||||
try {
|
||||
List<Cell> results = new ArrayList<Cell>();
|
||||
// For a Get there should be no more next's after the first call.
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals(false, scanner.next(results));
|
||||
// Should be one result only.
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals(2, results.size());
|
||||
// And we should have gone through optimize twice only.
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals("First qcode is SEEK_NEXT_COL and second INCLUDE_AND_SEEK_NEXT_ROW",
|
||||
3, scanner.count.get());
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
scanner.close();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Ensure that optimize does not cause the Get to do more seeking than required. Optimize
|
||||
* (see HBASE-15392) was causing us to seek all Cells in a block when a Get Scan if the next block
|
||||
* index/start key was a different row to the current one. A bug. We'd call next too often
|
||||
* because we had to exhaust all Cells in the current row making us load the next block just to
|
||||
* discard what we read there. This test is a little cryptic. Takes a bit of staring to figure
|
||||
* what it up to.
|
||||
* @throws IOException
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testOptimizeAndGetWithFakedNextBlockIndexStart() throws IOException {
|
||||
// First test a Get of second column in the row R2. Every Get is a Scan. Second column has a
|
||||
// qualifier of R2.
|
||||
Get get = new Get(THREE);
|
||||
get.addColumn(CF, TWO);
|
||||
Scan scan = new Scan(get);
|
||||
CellGridStoreScanner scanner = new CellGridStoreScanner(scan, this.scanInfo, this.scanType);
|
||||
try {
|
||||
List<Cell> results = new ArrayList<Cell>();
|
||||
// For a Get there should be no more next's after the first call.
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals(false, scanner.next(results));
|
||||
// Should be one result only.
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals(1, results.size());
|
||||
// And we should have gone through optimize twice only.
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals("First qcode is SEEK_NEXT_COL and second INCLUDE_AND_SEEK_NEXT_ROW",
|
||||
2, scanner.count.get());
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
scanner.close();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testScanTimeRange() throws IOException {
|
||||
String r1 = "R1";
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue