hbase-5378 book.xml - adding new section for coprocessors in Arch/RegionServer

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/trunk@1242870 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
This commit is contained in:
Doug Meil 2012-02-10 17:48:16 +00:00
parent c6519ca4c7
commit ac8ccdf477
1 changed files with 9 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -861,7 +861,7 @@ System.out.println("md5 digest as string length: " + sbDigest.length); // ret
<title> <title>
Coprocessor Secondary Index Coprocessor Secondary Index
</title> </title>
<para>Coprocessors act like RDBMS triggers. These are currently on TRUNK. <para>Coprocessors act like RDBMS triggers. These were added in 0.92. For more information, see <xref linkend="coprocessors"/>
</para> </para>
</section> </section>
</section> </section>
@ -1722,6 +1722,12 @@ rs.close();
</section> </section>
</section> </section>
<section xml:id="coprocessors"><title>Coprocessors</title>
<para>Coprocessors were added in 0.92. There is a thorough <link xlink:href="https://blogs.apache.org/hbase/entry/coprocessor_introduction">Blog Overview of CoProcessors</link>
posted. Documentation will eventually move to this book, but the blog is the most current information available at this time.
</para>
</section>
<section xml:id="block.cache"> <section xml:id="block.cache">
<title>Block Cache</title> <title>Block Cache</title>
<section xml:id="block.cache.design"> <section xml:id="block.cache.design">
@ -2247,8 +2253,8 @@ myHtd.setValue(HTableDescriptor.SPLIT_POLICY, MyCustomSplitPolicy.class.getName(
<listitem>5 --&gt; Yes, because sum(4, 3, 2, 1) * 1.0 = 10. Also, 5 is less than the min-size. </listitem> <listitem>5 --&gt; Yes, because sum(4, 3, 2, 1) * 1.0 = 10. Also, 5 is less than the min-size. </listitem>
<listitem>4 --&gt; Yes, because sum(3, 2, 1) * 1.0 = 6. Also, 4 is less than the min-size. </listitem> <listitem>4 --&gt; Yes, because sum(3, 2, 1) * 1.0 = 6. Also, 4 is less than the min-size. </listitem>
<listitem>3 --&gt; Yes, because sum(2, 1) * 1.0 = 3. Also, 3 is less than the min-size. </listitem> <listitem>3 --&gt; Yes, because sum(2, 1) * 1.0 = 3. Also, 3 is less than the min-size. </listitem>
<listitem>2 --&gt; No. Also, 2 is less than the min-size, the max-number of files to compact has been reached. </listitem> <listitem>2 --&gt; No. Candidate because previous file was selected and 2 is less than the min-size, but the max-number of files to compact has been reached. </listitem>
<listitem>1 --&gt; No. Also, 1 is less than the min-size, the max-number of files to compact has been reached. </listitem> <listitem>1 --&gt; No. Candidate because previous file was selected and 1 is less than the min-size, but max-number of files to compact has been reached. </listitem>
</itemizedlist> </itemizedlist>
</para> </para>
</section> </section>