HBASE-23686 Revert binary incompatible change in ByteRangeUtils and removed reflections in CommonFSUtils
Signed-off-by: Sean Busbey <busbey@apache.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4ce1f9b832
commit
bfa4b0c4c1
|
@ -51,4 +51,8 @@
|
|||
<suppress checks="EmptyBlock" files="org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestTimeout"/>
|
||||
<suppress checks="InnerAssignment" files="org.apache.hadoop.hbase.rest.PerformanceEvaluation"/>
|
||||
<suppress checks="EmptyBlock" files="org.apache.hadoop.hbase.rest.PerformanceEvaluation"/>
|
||||
<!-- Will not have a private constructor, because it is InterfaceAudience.Public -->
|
||||
<suppress checks="HideUtilityClassConstructor" files="org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.ByteRangeUtils"/>
|
||||
<!-- Will not be final, because it is InterfaceAudience.Public -->
|
||||
<suppress checks="FinalClass" files="org.apache.hadoop.hbase.net.Address"/>
|
||||
</suppressions>
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ import org.apache.hbase.thirdparty.com.google.common.net.HostAndPort;
|
|||
* We cannot have Guava classes in our API hence this Type.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@InterfaceAudience.Public
|
||||
public final class Address implements Comparable<Address> {
|
||||
public class Address implements Comparable<Address> {
|
||||
private HostAndPort hostAndPort;
|
||||
|
||||
private Address(HostAndPort hostAndPort) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -30,10 +30,7 @@ import org.apache.hbase.thirdparty.com.google.common.collect.Lists;
|
|||
* Utility methods for working with {@link ByteRange}.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@InterfaceAudience.Public
|
||||
public final class ByteRangeUtils {
|
||||
private ByteRangeUtils() {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public class ByteRangeUtils {
|
||||
public static int numEqualPrefixBytes(ByteRange left, ByteRange right, int rightInnerOffset) {
|
||||
int maxCompares = Math.min(left.getLength(), right.getLength() - rightInnerOffset);
|
||||
final byte[] lbytes = left.getBytes();
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -148,69 +148,22 @@ public abstract class CommonFSUtils {
|
|||
* Return the number of bytes that large input files should be optimally
|
||||
* be split into to minimize i/o time.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* use reflection to search for getDefaultBlockSize(Path f)
|
||||
* if the method doesn't exist, fall back to using getDefaultBlockSize()
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param fs filesystem object
|
||||
* @return the default block size for the path's filesystem
|
||||
* @throws IOException e
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public static long getDefaultBlockSize(final FileSystem fs, final Path path) throws IOException {
|
||||
Method m = null;
|
||||
Class<? extends FileSystem> cls = fs.getClass();
|
||||
try {
|
||||
m = cls.getMethod("getDefaultBlockSize", Path.class);
|
||||
} catch (NoSuchMethodException e) {
|
||||
LOG.info("FileSystem doesn't support getDefaultBlockSize");
|
||||
} catch (SecurityException e) {
|
||||
LOG.info("Doesn't have access to getDefaultBlockSize on FileSystems", e);
|
||||
m = null; // could happen on setAccessible()
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (m == null) {
|
||||
public static long getDefaultBlockSize(final FileSystem fs, final Path path) {
|
||||
return fs.getDefaultBlockSize(path);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
Object ret = m.invoke(fs, path);
|
||||
return ((Long)ret).longValue();
|
||||
} catch (Exception e) {
|
||||
throw new IOException(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Get the default replication.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* use reflection to search for getDefaultReplication(Path f)
|
||||
* if the method doesn't exist, fall back to using getDefaultReplication()
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param fs filesystem object
|
||||
* @param f path of file
|
||||
* @return default replication for the path's filesystem
|
||||
* @throws IOException e
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public static short getDefaultReplication(final FileSystem fs, final Path path)
|
||||
throws IOException {
|
||||
Method m = null;
|
||||
Class<? extends FileSystem> cls = fs.getClass();
|
||||
try {
|
||||
m = cls.getMethod("getDefaultReplication", Path.class);
|
||||
} catch (NoSuchMethodException e) {
|
||||
LOG.info("FileSystem doesn't support getDefaultReplication");
|
||||
} catch (SecurityException e) {
|
||||
LOG.info("Doesn't have access to getDefaultReplication on FileSystems", e);
|
||||
m = null; // could happen on setAccessible()
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (m == null) {
|
||||
public static short getDefaultReplication(final FileSystem fs, final Path path) {
|
||||
return fs.getDefaultReplication(path);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
Object ret = m.invoke(fs, path);
|
||||
return ((Number)ret).shortValue();
|
||||
} catch (Exception e) {
|
||||
throw new IOException(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
@ -568,40 +521,11 @@ public abstract class CommonFSUtils {
|
|||
*/
|
||||
private static void invokeSetStoragePolicy(final FileSystem fs, final Path path,
|
||||
final String storagePolicy) throws IOException {
|
||||
Method m = null;
|
||||
Exception toThrow = null;
|
||||
|
||||
try {
|
||||
m = fs.getClass().getDeclaredMethod("setStoragePolicy", Path.class, String.class);
|
||||
m.setAccessible(true);
|
||||
} catch (NoSuchMethodException e) {
|
||||
toThrow = e;
|
||||
final String msg = "FileSystem doesn't support setStoragePolicy; HDFS-6584, HDFS-9345 " +
|
||||
"not available. This is normal and expected on earlier Hadoop versions.";
|
||||
if (!warningMap.containsKey(fs)) {
|
||||
warningMap.put(fs, true);
|
||||
LOG.warn(msg, e);
|
||||
} else if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
|
||||
LOG.debug(msg, e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
m = null;
|
||||
} catch (SecurityException e) {
|
||||
toThrow = e;
|
||||
final String msg = "No access to setStoragePolicy on FileSystem from the SecurityManager; " +
|
||||
"HDFS-6584, HDFS-9345 not available. This is unusual and probably warrants an email " +
|
||||
"to the user@hbase mailing list. Please be sure to include a link to your configs, and " +
|
||||
"logs that include this message and period of time before it. Logs around service " +
|
||||
"start up will probably be useful as well.";
|
||||
if (!warningMap.containsKey(fs)) {
|
||||
warningMap.put(fs, true);
|
||||
LOG.warn(msg, e);
|
||||
} else if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
|
||||
LOG.debug(msg, e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
m = null; // could happen on setAccessible() or getDeclaredMethod()
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (m != null) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
m.invoke(fs, path, storagePolicy);
|
||||
fs.setStoragePolicy(path, storagePolicy);
|
||||
|
||||
if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
|
||||
LOG.debug("Set storagePolicy={} for path={}", storagePolicy, path);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -616,12 +540,11 @@ public abstract class CommonFSUtils {
|
|||
} else if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
|
||||
LOG.debug("Unable to set storagePolicy=" + storagePolicy + " for path=" + path, e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// check for lack of HDFS-7228
|
||||
if (e instanceof InvocationTargetException) {
|
||||
final Throwable exception = e.getCause();
|
||||
if (exception instanceof RemoteException &&
|
||||
if (e instanceof RemoteException &&
|
||||
HadoopIllegalArgumentException.class.getName().equals(
|
||||
((RemoteException)exception).getClassName())) {
|
||||
((RemoteException)e).getClassName())) {
|
||||
if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
|
||||
LOG.debug("Given storage policy, '" +storagePolicy +"', was rejected and probably " +
|
||||
"isn't a valid policy for the version of Hadoop you're running. I.e. if you're " +
|
||||
|
@ -630,7 +553,7 @@ public abstract class CommonFSUtils {
|
|||
}
|
||||
// Hadoop 2.8+, 3.0-a1+ added FileSystem.setStoragePolicy with a default implementation
|
||||
// that throws UnsupportedOperationException
|
||||
} else if (exception instanceof UnsupportedOperationException) {
|
||||
} else if (e instanceof UnsupportedOperationException) {
|
||||
if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
|
||||
LOG.debug("The underlying FileSystem implementation doesn't support " +
|
||||
"setStoragePolicy. This is probably intentional on their part, since HDFS-9345 " +
|
||||
|
@ -639,12 +562,11 @@ public abstract class CommonFSUtils {
|
|||
"specification docs from HADOOP-11981, and/or related documentation from the " +
|
||||
"provider of the underlying FileSystem (its name should appear in the " +
|
||||
"stacktrace that accompanies this message). Note in particular that Hadoop's " +
|
||||
"local filesystem implementation doesn't support storage policies.", exception);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
"local filesystem implementation doesn't support storage policies.", e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (toThrow != null) {
|
||||
throw new IOException(toThrow);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue