HBASE-24327 : Flaky connection in TestMasterShutdown#testMasterShutdo… (#1690)
Signed-off-by: Bharath Vissapragada <bharathv@apache.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
231d7f8256
commit
d9b60d3339
|
@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotEquals;
|
|||
import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull;
|
||||
import java.io.IOException;
|
||||
import java.util.List;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.CompletionException;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ClusterMetrics;
|
||||
|
@ -31,7 +33,6 @@ import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.HBaseTestingUtility;
|
|||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.LocalHBaseCluster;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.MiniHBaseCluster;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.StartMiniClusterOption;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.Waiter;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.testclassification.LargeTests;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.testclassification.MasterTests;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.JVMClusterUtil.MasterThread;
|
||||
|
@ -151,7 +152,9 @@ public class TestMasterShutdown {
|
|||
hbaseCluster = new LocalHBaseCluster(htu.getConfiguration(), options.getNumMasters(),
|
||||
options.getNumRegionServers(), options.getMasterClass(), options.getRsClass());
|
||||
final MasterThread masterThread = hbaseCluster.getMasters().get(0);
|
||||
|
||||
masterThread.start();
|
||||
final CompletableFuture<Void> shutdownFuture = CompletableFuture.runAsync(() -> {
|
||||
// Switching to master registry exacerbated a race in the master bootstrap that can result
|
||||
// in a lost shutdown command (HBASE-8422, HBASE-23836). The race is essentially because
|
||||
// the server manager in HMaster is not initialized by the time shutdown() RPC (below) is
|
||||
|
@ -160,10 +163,35 @@ public class TestMasterShutdown {
|
|||
// manager is usually init'ed in time for the RPC to be made. For now, adding an explicit
|
||||
// wait() in the test, waiting for the server manager to become available.
|
||||
final long timeout = TimeUnit.MINUTES.toMillis(10);
|
||||
assertNotEquals("Timeout waiting for server manager to become available.",
|
||||
-1, Waiter.waitFor(htu.getConfiguration(), timeout,
|
||||
() -> masterThread.getMaster().getServerManager() != null));
|
||||
assertNotEquals("timeout waiting for server manager to become available.", -1,
|
||||
htu.waitFor(timeout, () -> masterThread.getMaster().getServerManager() != null));
|
||||
|
||||
// Master has come up far enough that we can terminate it without creating a zombie.
|
||||
LOG.debug("Attempting to establish connection.");
|
||||
try {
|
||||
// HBASE-24327 : (Resolve Flaky connection issues)
|
||||
// shutdown() RPC can have flaky ZK connection issues.
|
||||
// e.g
|
||||
// ERROR [RpcServer.priority.RWQ.Fifo.read.handler=1,queue=1,port=53033]
|
||||
// master.HMaster(2878): ZooKeeper exception trying to set cluster as down in ZK
|
||||
// org.apache.zookeeper.KeeperException$SystemErrorException:
|
||||
// KeeperErrorCode = SystemError
|
||||
//
|
||||
// However, even when above flakes happen, shutdown call does get completed even if
|
||||
// RPC call has failure. Hence, subsequent retries will never succeed as HMaster is
|
||||
// already shutdown. Hence, it can fail. To resolve it, after making one shutdown()
|
||||
// call, we are ignoring IOException.
|
||||
htu.getConnection().getAdmin().shutdown();
|
||||
LOG.info("Shutdown RPC sent.");
|
||||
} catch (IOException | CompletionException e) {
|
||||
LOG.warn("Failed to establish connection.", e);
|
||||
} catch (Throwable e) {
|
||||
LOG.warn("Something unexpected happened.", e);
|
||||
throw new RuntimeException(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
shutdownFuture.join();
|
||||
masterThread.join();
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
if (hbaseCluster != null) {
|
||||
|
@ -186,19 +214,9 @@ public class TestMasterShutdown {
|
|||
conf.setInt(ServerManager.WAIT_ON_REGIONSERVERS_MINTOSTART, 1);
|
||||
// don't need a long write pipeline for this test.
|
||||
conf.setInt("dfs.replication", 1);
|
||||
return conf;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Create a new {@link Configuration} based on {@code baseConf} that has ZooKeeper connection
|
||||
* settings tuned very aggressively. The resulting client is used within a retry loop, so there's
|
||||
* no value in having the client itself do the retries. We want to iterate on the base
|
||||
* configuration because we're waiting for the mini-cluster to start and set it's ZK client port.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @return a new, configured {@link Configuration} instance.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private static Configuration createResponsiveZkConfig(final Configuration baseConf) {
|
||||
final Configuration conf = HBaseConfiguration.create(baseConf);
|
||||
// reduce client retries
|
||||
conf.setInt("hbase.client.retries.number", 3);
|
||||
// Recoverable ZK configs are tuned more aggressively
|
||||
conf.setInt(ReadOnlyZKClient.RECOVERY_RETRY, 3);
|
||||
conf.setInt(ReadOnlyZKClient.RECOVERY_RETRY_INTERVAL_MILLIS, 100);
|
||||
return conf;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue