Apache
/
hbase
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

HBASE-14227 Reduce the number of time row comparison is done in a Scan 

(Ram)
This commit is contained in:
ramkrishna 2016-01-08 10:42:11 +05:30
parent 90ca944e1b
commit e32e4df780
2 changed files with 35 additions and 17 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/ScanQueryMatcher.java
View File

@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ public class ScanQueryMatcher {
if (filter != null && filter.filterAllRemaining()) { if (filter != null && filter.filterAllRemaining()) {
return MatchCode.DONE_SCAN; return MatchCode.DONE_SCAN;
} }
if (row != null) {
int ret = this.rowComparator.compareRows(row, this.rowOffset, this.rowLength, int ret = this.rowComparator.compareRows(row, this.rowOffset, this.rowLength,
cell.getRowArray(), cell.getRowOffset(), cell.getRowLength()); cell.getRowArray(), cell.getRowOffset(), cell.getRowLength());
if (!this.isReversed) { if (!this.isReversed) {
@ -301,6 +302,9 @@ public class ScanQueryMatcher {
return MatchCode.DONE; return MatchCode.DONE;
} }
} }
} else {
return MatchCode.DONE;
}
// optimize case. // optimize case.
if (this.stickyNextRow) if (this.stickyNextRow)

20
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/StoreScanner.java
View File

@ -491,8 +491,7 @@ public class StoreScanner extends NonReversedNonLazyKeyValueScanner
// If no limits exists in the scope LimitScope.Between_Cells then we are sure we are changing // If no limits exists in the scope LimitScope.Between_Cells then we are sure we are changing
// rows. Else it is possible we are still traversing the same row so we must perform the row // rows. Else it is possible we are still traversing the same row so we must perform the row
// comparison. // comparison.
if (!scannerContext.hasAnyLimit(LimitScope.BETWEEN_CELLS) || matcher.row == null || if (!scannerContext.hasAnyLimit(LimitScope.BETWEEN_CELLS) || matcher.row == null) {
!Bytes.equals(row, offset, length, matcher.row, matcher.rowOffset, matcher.rowLength)) {
this.countPerRow = 0; this.countPerRow = 0;
matcher.setRow(row, offset, length); matcher.setRow(row, offset, length);
} }
@ -540,6 +539,10 @@ public class StoreScanner extends NonReversedNonLazyKeyValueScanner
if (!matcher.moreRowsMayExistAfter(cell)) { if (!matcher.moreRowsMayExistAfter(cell)) {
return scannerContext.setScannerState(NextState.NO_MORE_VALUES).hasMoreValues(); return scannerContext.setScannerState(NextState.NO_MORE_VALUES).hasMoreValues();
} }
// Setting the matcher.row = null, will mean that after the subsequent seekToNextRow()
// the heap.peek() will any way be in the next row. So the SQM.match(cell) need do
// another compareRow to say the current row is DONE
matcher.row = null;
seekToNextRow(cell); seekToNextRow(cell);
break LOOP; break LOOP;
} }
@ -567,6 +570,10 @@ public class StoreScanner extends NonReversedNonLazyKeyValueScanner
if (!matcher.moreRowsMayExistAfter(cell)) { if (!matcher.moreRowsMayExistAfter(cell)) {
return scannerContext.setScannerState(NextState.NO_MORE_VALUES).hasMoreValues(); return scannerContext.setScannerState(NextState.NO_MORE_VALUES).hasMoreValues();
} }
// Setting the matcher.row = null, will mean that after the subsequent seekToNextRow()
// the heap.peek() will any way be in the next row. So the SQM.match(cell) need do
// another compareRow to say the current row is DONE
matcher.row = null;
seekToNextRow(cell); seekToNextRow(cell);
} else if (qcode == ScanQueryMatcher.MatchCode.INCLUDE_AND_SEEK_NEXT_COL) { } else if (qcode == ScanQueryMatcher.MatchCode.INCLUDE_AND_SEEK_NEXT_COL) {
seekAsDirection(matcher.getKeyForNextColumn(cell)); seekAsDirection(matcher.getKeyForNextColumn(cell));
@ -583,6 +590,10 @@ public class StoreScanner extends NonReversedNonLazyKeyValueScanner
continue; continue;
case DONE: case DONE:
// We are sure that this row is done and we are in the next row.
// So subsequent StoresScanner.next() call need not do another compare
// and set the matcher.row
matcher.row = null;
return scannerContext.setScannerState(NextState.MORE_VALUES).hasMoreValues(); return scannerContext.setScannerState(NextState.MORE_VALUES).hasMoreValues();
case DONE_SCAN: case DONE_SCAN:
@ -595,7 +606,10 @@ public class StoreScanner extends NonReversedNonLazyKeyValueScanner
if (!matcher.moreRowsMayExistAfter(cell)) { if (!matcher.moreRowsMayExistAfter(cell)) {
return scannerContext.setScannerState(NextState.NO_MORE_VALUES).hasMoreValues(); return scannerContext.setScannerState(NextState.NO_MORE_VALUES).hasMoreValues();
} }
// Setting the matcher.row = null, will mean that after the subsequent seekToNextRow()
// the heap.peek() will any way be in the next row. So the SQM.match(cell) need do
// another compareRow to say the current row is DONE
matcher.row = null;
seekToNextRow(cell); seekToNextRow(cell);
break; break;