HBASE-21327 Fix minor logging issue where we don't report servername if no associated SCP

Signed-off-by: Duo Zhang <zhangduo@apache.org>
This commit is contained in:
Michael Stack 2018-10-16 21:21:02 -07:00
parent c67f7f14e2
commit f32d3e1e2c
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 9816C7FC8ACC93D2
3 changed files with 14 additions and 16 deletions

View File

@ -126,8 +126,8 @@ public class RegionServerTracker extends ZKListener {
// deadServersFromPE is made from a list of outstanding ServerCrashProcedures.
// splittingServersFromWALDir are being actively split -- the directory in the FS ends in
// '-SPLITTING'. Each splitting server should have a corresponding SCP. Log if not.
splittingServersFromWALDir.stream().map(s -> !deadServersFromPE.contains(s)).
forEach(s -> LOG.error("{} has no matching ServerCrashProcedure", s));
splittingServersFromWALDir.stream().filter(s -> !deadServersFromPE.contains(s)).
forEach(s -> LOG.error("{} has no matching ServerCrashProcedure", s));
watcher.registerListener(this);
synchronized (this) {
List<String> servers =

View File

@ -431,21 +431,16 @@ public class StochasticLoadBalancer extends BaseLoadBalancer {
updateStochasticCosts(tableName, curOverallCost, curFunctionCosts);
if (initCost > currentCost) {
plans = createRegionPlans(cluster);
if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
LOG.debug("Finished computing new load balance plan. Computation took "
+ (endTime - startTime) + "ms to try " + step
+ " different iterations. Found a solution that moves "
+ plans.size() + " regions; Going from a computed cost of "
+ initCost + " to a new cost of " + currentCost);
}
LOG.info("Finished computing new load balance plan. Computation took {}" +
" to try {} different iterations. Found a solution that moves " +
"{} regions; Going from a computed cost of {}" +
" to a new cost of {}", java.time.Duration.ofMillis(endTime - startTime),
step, plans.size(), initCost, currentCost);
return plans;
}
if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
LOG.debug("Could not find a better load balance plan. Tried "
+ step + " different configurations in " + (endTime - startTime)
+ "ms, and did not find anything with a computed cost less than " + initCost);
}
LOG.info("Could not find a better load balance plan. Tried {} different configurations in " +
"{}, and did not find anything with a computed cost less than {}", step,
java.time.Duration.ofMillis(endTime - startTime), initCost);
return null;
}

View File

@ -687,7 +687,6 @@ public class MasterProcedureScheduler extends AbstractProcedureScheduler {
boolean hasLock = true;
final LockAndQueue[] regionLocks = new LockAndQueue[regionInfo.length];
for (int i = 0; i < regionInfo.length; ++i) {
LOG.info("{} checking lock on {}", procedure, regionInfo[i].getEncodedName());
assert regionInfo[i] != null;
assert regionInfo[i].getTable() != null;
assert regionInfo[i].getTable().equals(table): regionInfo[i] + " " + procedure;
@ -695,12 +694,16 @@ public class MasterProcedureScheduler extends AbstractProcedureScheduler {
regionLocks[i] = locking.getRegionLock(regionInfo[i].getEncodedName());
if (!regionLocks[i].tryExclusiveLock(procedure)) {
LOG.info("Waiting on xlock for {} held by pid={}", procedure,
regionLocks[i].getExclusiveLockProcIdOwner());
waitProcedure(regionLocks[i], procedure);
hasLock = false;
while (i-- > 0) {
regionLocks[i].releaseExclusiveLock(procedure);
}
break;
} else {
LOG.info("Took xlock for {}", procedure);
}
}