Building on HBase-15958.
Provided a ReplicationQueuesClientHBaseImpl that relies on the HBase Replication Table to track WAL queues.
Refactored out a large section of ReplicationQueuesHBaseImpl into a ReplicationTableClient class that handles Replication Table operations.
Signed-off-by: Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org>
Building on HBase-15883.
Now implementing the claim queues procedure within an HBase table.
Also added UnitTests to test claimQueue.
Peer tracking will still be performed by ZooKeeper though.
Also modified the queueId tracking procedure so we no longer have to perform scans over the Replication Table.
This does make our queue naming schema slightly different from ReplicationQueuesZKImpl though.
Signed-off-by: Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org>
- Testing by executing a command will cover the exact path users will trigger, so its better then directly calling library functions in tests. Changing the tests to use @shell.command(:<command>, args) to execute them like it's a command coming from shell.
Norm change:
Commands should print the output user would like to see, but in the end, should also return the relevant value. This way:
- Tests can use returned value to check that functionality works
- Tests can capture stdout to assert particular kind of output user should see.
- We do not print the return value in interactive mode and keep the output clean. See Shell.command() function.
Bugs found due to this change:
- Uncovered bug in major_compact.rb with this approach. It was calling admin.majorCompact() which doesn't exist but our tests didn't catch it since they directly tested admin.major_compact()
- Enabled TestReplicationShell. If it's bad, flaky infra will take care of it.
Change-Id: I5d8af16bf477a79a2f526a5bf11c245b02b7d276
Implemented ReplicationQueuesHBaseImpl that tracks WAL offsets and replication queues in an HBase table.
Only wrote the basic tracking methods, have not implemented claimQueue() or HFileRef methods yet.
Wrote a basic unit test for ReplicationQueueHBaseImpl that tests the implemented functions on a single Region Server
Signed-off-by: Elliott Clark <elliott@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org>
It added this in AsyncProcess#waitForMaximumCurrentTasks:
synchronized (this.tasksInProgress) {
+ if (tasksInProgress.get() != oldInProgress) break;
this.tasksInProgress.wait(100);
which added a break out of our waiting loop if any change in
count of tasks; it seems that what was wanted was instead to
avoid the wait if there was movement in the count of completed
task.
Reformats waitForMaximumCurrentTasks so it is testable. Adds
test that we indeed wait on the specified parameter.
tedyu
Enis Soztutar
Joseph Hwang
anoopsjohn
Jurriaan Mous
Ashish Singhi
Matteo Bertozzi
Sergey Soldatov
Andrew Purtell
Apekshit Sharma
Ramkrishna
Yu Li
Sean Mackrory
Gary Helmling
Mikhail Antonov
Jerry He
stack
eshcar
Phil Yang
Elliott Clark
Sean Busbey