Earlier when queues had locks, clearQueue() also cleaned up old locks when AbstractProcedureScheduler.clear() was called to reset scheduler for testing failure and recovery.
Now with locks decoupled from queues, they need to be separately cleaned up.
We can't have clearLocks() as abstract method in AbstractProcedureScheduler because at that level, a procedure scheduler is just a queue. It's only in MasterProcedureScheduler that locks come into picture. So directly overriding clear() method in MPS.
Earlier when queues had locks, clearQueue() also cleaned up old locks when AbstractProcedureScheduler.clear() was called.
Now with locks decoupled from queues, they need to be separately cleaned up.
We can't have clearLocks() as abstract method in AbstractProcedureScheduler because at that level, a procedure scheduler is just a queue. It's only in MasterProcedureScheduler that locks come into picture. So directly overriding clear() method in MPS.
Change-Id: If1a0acb418a79f98ce6155541edb0c1e621638e3
Changes contain:
- Making rsGroupInfoManager non-static in RSGroupAdminEndpoint
- Encapsulate RSGroupAdminService into an internal class in RSGroupAdminEndpoint (on need of inheritence).
- Change two internal classes in RSGroupAdminServer to non-static (so outer classes' variables can be shared).
- Rename RSGroupSerDe to RSGroupProtobufUtil('ProtobufUtil' is what we use in other places). Moved 2 functions to RSGroupManagerImpl because they are only used there.
- Javadoc comments
- Improving variable names
- Maybe other misc refactoring
Change-Id: I09f0f5aa413150390c91795b8a8fd5e6cdd6c416
Reason for refactor:
In cases where one might need to use multiple observers, say region, master and regionserver; and the fact that only one class can be extended, it gives rise to following pattern:
public class BaseMasterAndRegionObserver
extends BaseRegionObserver
implements MasterObserver
class AccessController
extends BaseMasterAndRegionObserver
implements RegionServerObserver
were BaseMasterAndRegionObserver is full copy of BaseMasterObserver.
There is an example of simple case too where the current design fails.
Say only one observer is needed by the coprocessor, but the design doesn't permit extending even that single observer (see RSGroupAdminEndpoint), that leads to copy of full Bas
e...Observer class into coprocessor class leading to 1000s of lines of code and this ugly mix of 5 main functions with 100 useless functions.
Javadocs changes:
- Adds class comments on 'default' methods and expectations.
- Adds explanaiton of Exception handling in Observers' class comment. Removes redundant @throws before each function.
- Improves javadocs for a bunch of functions
- deletes empty @params in a bunch of places
Change-Id: I265738d47e8554e7b4678e88bb916a0cc7d00ab3
Currently whenever a compaction/bulkload happen and the
blocks are evicted from theirs buckets the buckets become
fragmented and are not available to be used by other
BucketSizes
Bug Fix : Added Memory block type also to the list of
evictions that need to happen when there is a needForExtra
Improvement : Inorder to fix the non availabilty of Buckets and force
the movement of buckets to transformed sizes, whenever we encounter a
situation where an allocation cant be made for a BucketSize, we will
forcefully free the entire buckets that have least occupancy ratio. This
is the same strategy used by MemCached when they encounter a similar
issue going by the name 'Slab Calcification'. Only improvement is that
we use a heuristic to evict from the buckets that are least occupied
and also avoid the BucketSizes where there is a single Bucket
Change-Id: I9e3b4deb8d893953003ddf5f1e66312ed97ea9cb
Signed-off-by: Ramkrishna <ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@intel.com>
This patch restores the regime instituted in original rsgroups patch
(HBASE-6721) where reading of rsgroup state runs unimpeded against
COW immutable Maps whereas mutation to state require exclusive locks
(updating the Maps of state when done). HBASE-17624 was
over-enthusiastic with its locking down of access making it likely
we'd deadlock.
Adds documentation on concurrency expectations.
Jingcheng Du
Andrew Purtell
tedyu
Michael Stack
Jan Hentschel
Apekshit Sharma
Ashu Pachauri
dvdreddy
zhangduo
Abhishek Singh Chouhan
anoopsamjohn
huzheng
Sean Busbey
Yu Li
Phil Yang
rgidwani
ChiaPing Tsai
Huaxiang Sun
Tim Brown
Yi Liang