HTTPCLIENT-1032: Refactor to clean up duplicated code in cache
entry validation (regular, and variant reuse negotation) by extracting code to shared method. git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpcomponents/httpclient/trunk@1045357 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
This commit is contained in:
parent
a26fb6a846
commit
24a5f0c060
|
@ -573,6 +573,25 @@ public class CachingHttpClient implements HttpClient {
|
|||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private boolean revalidationResponseIsTooOld(HttpResponse backendResponse,
|
||||
HttpCacheEntry cacheEntry) {
|
||||
final Header entryDateHeader = cacheEntry.getFirstHeader("Date");
|
||||
final Header responseDateHeader = backendResponse.getFirstHeader("Date");
|
||||
if (entryDateHeader != null && responseDateHeader != null) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
Date entryDate = DateUtils.parseDate(entryDateHeader.getValue());
|
||||
Date respDate = DateUtils.parseDate(responseDateHeader.getValue());
|
||||
if (respDate.before(entryDate)) return true;
|
||||
} catch (DateParseException e) {
|
||||
// either backend response or cached entry did not have a valid
|
||||
// Date header, so we can't tell if they are out of order
|
||||
// according to the origin clock; thus we can skip the
|
||||
// unconditional retry recommended in 13.2.6 of RFC 2616.
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
HttpResponse negotiateResponseFromVariants(HttpHost target,
|
||||
HttpRequest request, HttpContext context,
|
||||
Map<String, HttpCacheEntry> variantEntries) throws IOException, ProtocolException {
|
||||
|
@ -594,7 +613,6 @@ public class CachingHttpClient implements HttpClient {
|
|||
return callBackend(target, request, context);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
String resultEtag = resultEtagHeader.getValue();
|
||||
HttpCacheEntry matchedEntry = variantEntries.get(resultEtag);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -603,29 +621,11 @@ public class CachingHttpClient implements HttpClient {
|
|||
return callBackend(target, request, context);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// make sure this cache entry is indeed new enough to update with,
|
||||
// if not force to refresh
|
||||
final Header entryDateHeader = matchedEntry.getFirstHeader("Date");
|
||||
final Header responseDateHeader = backendResponse.getFirstHeader("Date");
|
||||
if (entryDateHeader != null && responseDateHeader != null) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
Date entryDate = DateUtils.parseDate(entryDateHeader.getValue());
|
||||
Date respDate = DateUtils.parseDate(responseDateHeader.getValue());
|
||||
if (respDate.before(entryDate)) {
|
||||
// TODO: what to do here? what if the initial request was a conditional
|
||||
// request. It would get the same result whether it went through our
|
||||
// cache or not...
|
||||
if (revalidationResponseIsTooOld(backendResponse, matchedEntry)) {
|
||||
HttpRequest unconditional = conditionalRequestBuilder
|
||||
.buildUnconditionalRequest(request, matchedEntry);
|
||||
return callBackend(target, unconditional, context);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} catch (DateParseException e) {
|
||||
// either backend response or cached entry did not have a valid
|
||||
// Date header, so we can't tell if they are out of order
|
||||
// according to the origin clock; thus we can skip the
|
||||
// unconditional retry recommended in 13.2.6 of RFC 2616.
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cacheUpdates.getAndIncrement();
|
||||
setResponseStatus(context, CacheResponseStatus.VALIDATED);
|
||||
|
@ -657,32 +657,20 @@ public class CachingHttpClient implements HttpClient {
|
|||
HttpRequest request,
|
||||
HttpContext context,
|
||||
HttpCacheEntry cacheEntry) throws IOException, ProtocolException {
|
||||
|
||||
HttpRequest conditionalRequest = conditionalRequestBuilder.buildConditionalRequest(request, cacheEntry);
|
||||
|
||||
Date requestDate = getCurrentDate();
|
||||
HttpResponse backendResponse = backend.execute(target, conditionalRequest, context);
|
||||
Date responseDate = getCurrentDate();
|
||||
|
||||
final Header entryDateHeader = cacheEntry.getFirstHeader("Date");
|
||||
final Header responseDateHeader = backendResponse.getFirstHeader("Date");
|
||||
if (entryDateHeader != null && responseDateHeader != null) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
Date entryDate = DateUtils.parseDate(entryDateHeader.getValue());
|
||||
Date respDate = DateUtils.parseDate(responseDateHeader.getValue());
|
||||
if (respDate.before(entryDate)) {
|
||||
if (revalidationResponseIsTooOld(backendResponse, cacheEntry)) {
|
||||
HttpRequest unconditional = conditionalRequestBuilder
|
||||
.buildUnconditionalRequest(request, cacheEntry);
|
||||
requestDate = getCurrentDate();
|
||||
backendResponse = backend.execute(target, unconditional, context);
|
||||
responseDate = getCurrentDate();
|
||||
}
|
||||
} catch (DateParseException e) {
|
||||
// either backend response or cached entry did not have a valid
|
||||
// Date header, so we can't tell if they are out of order
|
||||
// according to the origin clock; thus we can skip the
|
||||
// unconditional retry recommended in 13.2.6 of RFC 2616.
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
backendResponse.addHeader("Via", generateViaHeader(backendResponse));
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue