HTTPCLIENT-1690: Avoid updating the cache entry with Content-Encoding headers too. (missing piece from last commit). Updated the test case
This commit is contained in:
parent
0bc7f67178
commit
5f2ad23ab3
|
@ -163,6 +163,10 @@ class CacheUpdateHandler {
|
|||
}
|
||||
for (final Iterator<Header> it = response.headerIterator(); it.hasNext(); ) {
|
||||
final Header responseHeader = it.next();
|
||||
// Since we do not expect a content in a 304 response, should update the cache entry with Content-Encoding
|
||||
if (HttpHeaders.CONTENT_ENCODING.equals(responseHeader.getName())) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
headerGroup.addHeader(responseHeader);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return headerGroup.getAllHeaders();
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -263,6 +263,7 @@ public class TestCacheUpdateHandler {
|
|||
|
||||
final Header[] updatedHeaders = updatedEntry.getAllHeaders();
|
||||
headersContain(updatedHeaders, "Content-Encoding", "identity");
|
||||
headersNotContain(updatedHeaders, "Content-Encoding", "gzip");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private void headersContain(final Header[] headers, final String name, final String value) {
|
||||
|
@ -276,4 +277,13 @@ public class TestCacheUpdateHandler {
|
|||
fail("Header [" + name + ": " + value + "] not found in headers.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private void headersNotContain(final Header[] headers, final String name, final String value) {
|
||||
for (final Header header : headers) {
|
||||
if (header.getName().equals(name)) {
|
||||
if (header.getValue().equals(value)) {
|
||||
fail("Header [" + name + ": " + value + "] found in headers where it should not be");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue