Update NTLM documentation.
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpcomponents/httpclient/trunk@1421863 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
This commit is contained in:
parent
a273929a9b
commit
d04288a5e5
|
@ -47,11 +47,25 @@ NTLM support in HttpClient
|
|||
{{{http://www.microsoft.com/interop/principles/default.mspx}Interoperability
|
||||
Principles initiative}}.
|
||||
|
||||
HttpClient as of version 4.1 supports NTLMv1 and NTLMv2 authentication protocols out
|
||||
of the box using a custom authentication engine. However, there are still known compatibility
|
||||
issues with newer Microsoft products as the default NTLM engine implementation is still
|
||||
relatively new. One can also use {{{http://jcifs.samba.org/}JCIFS}} as an alternative, more
|
||||
established and mature NTLM engine developed by Samba project.
|
||||
HttpClient as of version 4.1 initially supported NTLMv1, NTLMv2, and NTLM2SessionResponse
|
||||
authentication protocols, based on the reverse engineering approach. As of version
|
||||
4.2.3, HttpClient now supports a more correct implementation, based in large part on
|
||||
Microsoft's own specifications. This is expected to correct a number of problems, especially
|
||||
since Microsoft (as of Windows Server 2008 R2) began using a new implementation of its
|
||||
protocols. This new Microsoft implementation has led to authentication failures in some
|
||||
cases from some of the older reverse-engineered client implementations of NTLM.
|
||||
|
||||
The new HttpClient NTLM implementation is known to have been tried successfully against
|
||||
at least the following systems:
|
||||
|
||||
* Windows Server 2000 and Server 2003 systems, configured to use LM and NTLMv1 authentication
|
||||
* Windows Server 2003 systems, configured to use NTLMv2 authentication
|
||||
* Windows Server 2008 R2 systems, configured to use NTLM2SessionResponse authentication
|
||||
|
||||
If the current HttpClient NTLM implementation should prove problematic in your environment,
|
||||
we'd definitely like to hear about it. You are also welcome to try an alternative NTLM
|
||||
implementation, should it seem necessary. One can also use {{{http://jcifs.samba.org/}JCIFS}},
|
||||
which includes an NTLM engine developed by members of the Samba project.
|
||||
|
||||
* {Using Samba JCIFS as an alternative NTLM engine}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue