Apache
/
lucene
mirror of https://github.com/apache/lucene.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

slightly improve the benchmark template: add Lucene version, query speed 

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk@150502 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Naber 2004-09-12 11:36:59 +00:00
parent 54bfbc30de
commit 515cf2153a
3 changed files with 21 additions and 9 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
docs/benchmarks.html
View File

@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ limitations under the License.
</p>
<p>
<b>Software environment</b><br />
<li><i>Lucene Version</i>: Self-explanatory</li>
<li><i>Java Version</i>: Version of Java SDK/JRE that is run
</li>
<li><i>Java VM</i>: Server/client VM, Sun VM/JRockIt</li>
@ -197,7 +198,7 @@ limitations under the License.
Self-explanatory</li>
<li><i>Source documents storage location</i>: Where are the
documents being indexed located?
Filesystem, DB, http,etc</li>
Filesystem, DB, http, etc.</li>
<li><i>File type of source documents</i>: Types of files being
indexed, e.g. HTML files, XML files, PDF files, etc.</li>
<li><i>Parser(s) used, if any</i>: Parsers used for parsing the
@ -208,7 +209,7 @@ limitations under the License.
Document contains</li>
<li><i>Type of fields</i>: Type of each field</li>
<li><i>Index persistence</i>: Where the index is stored, e.g.
FSDirectory, SqlDirectory, etc</li>
FSDirectory, SqlDirectory, etc.</li>
</p>
<p>
<b>Figures</b><br />
@ -217,11 +218,14 @@ limitations under the License.
<li><i>Time taken / 1000 docs indexed</i>: Time taken to index
1000 files</li>
<li><i>Memory consumption</i>: Self-explanatory</li>
<li><i>Query speed</i>: average time a query takes, type
of queries (e.g. simple one-term query, phrase query),
not measuring any overhead outside Lucene</li>
</p>
<p>
<b>Notes</b><br />
<li><i>Notes</i>: Any comments which don't belong in the above,
special tuning/strategies, etc</li>
special tuning/strategies, etc.</li>
</p>
</ul>
</p>
@ -503,7 +507,7 @@ limitations under the License.
XSL transformation on them, and then proceeded to index the stream. The indexer optimized
the index every 50,000 documents (on this run) though previously, we optimized every
300,000 documents. The performance didn't change much either way. We did no other
tuning (RAM Directories, separate process to pretransform the source material, etc)
tuning (RAM Directories, separate process to pretransform the source material, etc.)
to make it index faster. When all of these individual indexes were built, they were
merged together into the main index. That process usually took ~ a day.
</p>

6
docs/benchmarktemplate.xml
View File

@ -11,11 +11,12 @@ RAID-5)</li>
</p>
<p>
<b>Software environment</b><br/>
<li><i>Lucene Version</i>: Self-explanatory</li>
<li><i>Java Version</i>: Version of Java SDK/JRE that is run </li>
<li><i>Java VM</i>: Server/client VM, Sun VM/JRockIt</li>
<li><i>OS Version</i>: Self-explanatory</li>
<li><i>Location of index</i>: Is the index stored in filesystem or
database? Is it on the same server(local) or
database? Is it on the same server (local) or
over the network?</li>
</p>
<p>
@ -47,6 +48,9 @@ runs)</i>: Time taken to index to index all files</li>
<li><i>Time taken / 1000 docs indexed</i>: Time taken to index 1000
files</li>
<li><i>Memory consumption</i>: Self-explanatory</li>
<li><i>Query speed</i>: average time a query takes, type
of queries (e.g. simple one-term query, phrase query),
not measuring any overhead outside Lucene</li>
</p>
<p>
<b>Notes</b><br/>

12
xdocs/benchmarks.xml
View File

@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
</p>
<p>
<b>Software environment</b><br/>
<li><i>Lucene Version</i>: Self-explanatory</li>
<li><i>Java Version</i>: Version of Java SDK/JRE that is run
</li>
<li><i>Java VM</i>: Server/client VM, Sun VM/JRockIt</li>
@ -56,7 +57,7 @@
Self-explanatory</li>
<li><i>Source documents storage location</i>: Where are the
documents being indexed located?
Filesystem, DB, http,etc</li>
Filesystem, DB, http, etc.</li>
<li><i>File type of source documents</i>: Types of files being
indexed, e.g. HTML files, XML files, PDF files, etc.</li>
<li><i>Parser(s) used, if any</i>: Parsers used for parsing the
@ -67,7 +68,7 @@
Document contains</li>
<li><i>Type of fields</i>: Type of each field</li>
<li><i>Index persistence</i>: Where the index is stored, e.g.
FSDirectory, SqlDirectory, etc</li>
FSDirectory, SqlDirectory, etc.</li>
</p>
<p>
<b>Figures</b><br/>
@ -76,11 +77,14 @@
<li><i>Time taken / 1000 docs indexed</i>: Time taken to index
1000 files</li>
<li><i>Memory consumption</i>: Self-explanatory</li>
<li><i>Query speed</i>: average time a query takes, type
of queries (e.g. simple one-term query, phrase query),
not measuring any overhead outside Lucene</li>
</p>
<p>
<b>Notes</b><br/>
<li><i>Notes</i>: Any comments which don't belong in the above,
special tuning/strategies, etc</li>
special tuning/strategies, etc.</li>
</p>
</ul>
</p>
@ -329,7 +333,7 @@
XSL transformation on them, and then proceeded to index the stream. The indexer optimized
the index every 50,000 documents (on this run) though previously, we optimized every
300,000 documents. The performance didn't change much either way. We did no other
tuning (RAM Directories, separate process to pretransform the source material, etc)
tuning (RAM Directories, separate process to pretransform the source material, etc.)
to make it index faster. When all of these individual indexes were built, they were
merged together into the main index. That process usually took ~ a day.
</p>