LUCENE-2936: PhraseQuery score explanations were not correctly identifying matches vs non-matches

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk@1074357 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
This commit is contained in:
Chris M. Hostetter 2011-02-25 00:15:42 +00:00
parent b43011aef5
commit 6d1353bc59
5 changed files with 78 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -355,6 +355,9 @@ Bug fixes
with more document deletions is requested before a reader with fewer
deletions, provided they share some segments. (yonik)
* LUCENE-2936: PhraseQuery score explanations were not correctly
identifying matches vs non-matches. (hossman)
======================= Lucene 3.x (not yet released) =======================
Changes in backwards compatibility policy

View File

@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ public class PhraseQuery extends Query {
public Explanation explain(AtomicReaderContext context, int doc)
throws IOException {
Explanation result = new Explanation();
ComplexExplanation result = new ComplexExplanation();
result.setDescription("weight("+getQuery()+" in "+doc+"), product of:");
StringBuilder docFreqs = new StringBuilder();
@ -303,10 +303,7 @@ public class PhraseQuery extends Query {
// combine them
result.setValue(queryExpl.getValue() * fieldExpl.getValue());
if (queryExpl.getValue() == 1.0f)
return fieldExpl;
result.setMatch(tfExplanation.isMatch());
return result;
}
}

View File

@ -39,8 +39,8 @@ public class CheckHits {
/**
* Tests that all documents up to maxDoc which are *not* in the
* expected result set, have an explanation which indicates no match
* (ie: Explanation value of 0.0f)
* expected result set, have an explanation which indicates that
* the document does not match
*/
public static void checkNoMatchExplanations(Query q, String defaultFieldName,
IndexSearcher searcher, int[] results)
@ -59,9 +59,9 @@ public class CheckHits {
Explanation exp = searcher.explain(q, doc);
Assert.assertNotNull("Explanation of [["+d+"]] for #"+doc+" is null",
exp);
Assert.assertEquals("Explanation of [["+d+"]] for #"+doc+
" doesn't indicate non-match: " + exp.toString(),
0.0f, exp.getValue(), 0.0f);
Assert.assertFalse("Explanation of [["+d+"]] for #"+doc+
" doesn't indicate non-match: " + exp.toString(),
exp.isMatch());
}
}
@ -484,6 +484,9 @@ public class CheckHits {
Assert.assertNotNull("Explanation of [["+d+"]] for #"+doc+" is null", exp);
verifyExplanation(d,doc,scorer.score(),deep,exp);
Assert.assertTrue("Explanation of [["+d+"]] for #"+ doc +
" does not indicate match: " + exp.toString(),
exp.isMatch());
}
@Override
public void setNextReader(AtomicReaderContext context) {

View File

@ -52,7 +52,10 @@ public class TestExplanations extends LuceneTestCase {
protected Directory directory;
public static final String KEY = "KEY";
// boost on this field is the same as the iterator for the doc
public static final String FIELD = "field";
// same contents, but no field boost
public static final String ALTFIELD = "alt";
public static final QueryParser qp =
new QueryParser(TEST_VERSION_CURRENT, FIELD, new MockAnalyzer());
@ -72,7 +75,10 @@ public class TestExplanations extends LuceneTestCase {
for (int i = 0; i < docFields.length; i++) {
Document doc = new Document();
doc.add(newField(KEY, ""+i, Field.Store.NO, Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED));
doc.add(newField(FIELD, docFields[i], Field.Store.NO, Field.Index.ANALYZED));
Field f = newField(FIELD, docFields[i], Field.Store.NO, Field.Index.ANALYZED);
f.setBoost(i);
doc.add(f);
doc.add(newField(ALTFIELD, docFields[i], Field.Store.NO, Field.Index.ANALYZED));
writer.addDocument(doc);
}
reader = writer.getReader();

View File

@ -289,4 +289,62 @@ public class TestSimpleExplanations extends TestExplanations {
qtest(q, new int[] { 0,3 });
}
/* BQ of TQ: using alt so some fields have zero boost and some don't */
public void testMultiFieldBQ1() throws Exception {
qtest("+w1 +alt:w2", new int[] { 0,1,2,3 });
}
public void testMultiFieldBQ2() throws Exception {
qtest("+yy +alt:w3", new int[] { 2,3 });
}
public void testMultiFieldBQ3() throws Exception {
qtest("yy +alt:w3", new int[] { 0,1,2,3 });
}
public void testMultiFieldBQ4() throws Exception {
qtest("w1 (-xx alt:w2)", new int[] { 0,1,2,3 });
}
public void testMultiFieldBQ5() throws Exception {
qtest("w1 (+alt:qq alt:w2)", new int[] { 0,1,2,3 });
}
public void testMultiFieldBQ6() throws Exception {
qtest("w1 -(-alt:qq alt:w5)", new int[] { 1,2,3 });
}
public void testMultiFieldBQ7() throws Exception {
qtest("+w1 +(alt:qq (alt:xx -alt:w2) (+alt:w3 +alt:w4))", new int[] { 0 });
}
public void testMultiFieldBQ8() throws Exception {
qtest("+alt:w1 (qq (alt:xx -w2) (+alt:w3 +w4))", new int[] { 0,1,2,3 });
}
public void testMultiFieldBQ9() throws Exception {
qtest("+w1 (alt:qq (-xx w2) -(+alt:w3 +w4))", new int[] { 0,1,2,3 });
}
public void testMultiFieldBQ10() throws Exception {
qtest("+w1 +(alt:qq (-xx alt:w2) -(+alt:w3 +w4))", new int[] { 1 });
}
/* BQ of PQ: using alt so some fields have zero boost and some don't */
public void testMultiFieldBQofPQ1() throws Exception {
qtest("\"w1 w2\" alt:\"w1 w2\"", new int[] { 0 });
}
public void testMultiFieldBQofPQ2() throws Exception {
qtest("\"w1 w3\" alt:\"w1 w3\"", new int[] { 1,3 });
}
public void testMultiFieldBQofPQ3() throws Exception {
qtest("\"w1 w2\"~1 alt:\"w1 w2\"~1", new int[] { 0,1,2 });
}
public void testMultiFieldBQofPQ4() throws Exception {
qtest("\"w2 w3\"~1 alt:\"w2 w3\"~1", new int[] { 0,1,2,3 });
}
public void testMultiFieldBQofPQ5() throws Exception {
qtest("\"w3 w2\"~1 alt:\"w3 w2\"~1", new int[] { 1,3 });
}
public void testMultiFieldBQofPQ6() throws Exception {
qtest("\"w3 w2\"~2 alt:\"w3 w2\"~2", new int[] { 0,1,3 });
}
public void testMultiFieldBQofPQ7() throws Exception {
qtest("\"w3 w2\"~3 alt:\"w3 w2\"~3", new int[] { 0,1,2,3 });
}
}